@@ -1052,7 +1052,7 @@ int __atomisp_reqbufs(struct file *file, void *fh,
atomisp_alloc_css_stat_bufs(asd, stream_id);
/*
- * for user pointer type, buffers are not really allcated here,
+ * for user pointer type, buffers are not really allocated here,
* buffers are setup in QBUF operation through v4l2_buffer structure
*/
if (req->memory == V4L2_MEMORY_USERPTR)
@@ -1225,6 +1225,10 @@ static int atomisp_qbuf(struct file *file, void *fh, struct v4l2_buffer *buf)
buf->flags |= V4L2_BUF_FLAG_MAPPED;
buf->flags |= V4L2_BUF_FLAG_QUEUED;
buf->flags &= ~V4L2_BUF_FLAG_DONE;
+
+ /*
+ * For mmap, frames were allocated at request buffers
+ */
}
done:
The frame allocation logic happens differently for userptr or normal mmap. On a quick look, this sounded to be unbalanced, but the logic should actually work for both cases. Add an extra comment to reflect it. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> --- drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_ioctl.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)