@@ -3188,14 +3188,14 @@ static int btrfs_zero_range(struct inode *inode,
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
space_reserved = true;
- ret = btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data(inode, &data_reserved,
- alloc_start, bytes_to_reserve);
- if (ret)
- goto out;
ret = btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range(inode, lockstart, lockend,
&cached_state);
if (ret)
goto out;
+ ret = btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data(inode, &data_reserved,
+ alloc_start, bytes_to_reserve);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out;
ret = btrfs_prealloc_file_range(inode, mode, alloc_start,
alloc_end - alloc_start,
i_blocksize(inode),
The incoming qgroup reserved space timing will move the data reserve to ordered extent completely. However in btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range() will call btrfs_invalidate_page(), which will clear QGROUP_RESERVED bit for the range. In current stage it's OK, but if we're making ordered extents to handle the reserved space, then btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range() can clear the QGROUP_RESERVED bit before we submit ordered extent, leading to qgroup reserved space leakage. So here change the timing to make reserve data space after btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range(). The new timing is fine for either current code or the new code. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> --- fs/btrfs/file.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)