spi: fsl: add missing __iomem annotation

Commit Message

Luc Van Oostenryck June 22, 2020, 4:26 p.m. UTC

The field mspi->reg_base is annotated as an __iomem pointer. Good.

However, this field is often assigned to a temporary variable:
before being used. For example:
	struct fsl_spi_reg *reg_base = mspi->reg_base;

But this variable is missing the __iomem annotation.
So, add the missing __iomem and make sparse & the bot happier.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <[e-mail]>
Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <[e-mail]>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-fsl-spi.c | 18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)


base-commit: 48778464bb7d346b47157d21ffde2af6b2d39110

Comments

Mark Brown July 1, 2020, 10:24 p.m. UTC | #1

On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:26:11 +0200, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote:
> The field mspi->reg_base is annotated as an __iomem pointer. Good.
> 
> However, this field is often assigned to a temporary variable:
> before being used. For example:
> 	struct fsl_spi_reg *reg_base = mspi->reg_base;
> 
> But this variable is missing the __iomem annotation.
> So, add the missing __iomem and make sparse & the bot happier.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: fsl: add missing __iomem annotation
      commit: dd67de8c3b421376b4b6dac14263763aa75535fc

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-spi.c
index 67f022b8c81d..299e9870cf58 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-spi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-spi.c
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@  static void fsl_spi_change_mode(struct spi_device *spi)
 {
 	struct mpc8xxx_spi *mspi = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
 	struct spi_mpc8xxx_cs *cs = spi->controller_state;
-	struct fsl_spi_reg *reg_base = mspi->reg_base;
+	struct fsl_spi_reg __iomem *reg_base = mspi->reg_base;
 	__be32 __iomem *mode = &reg_base->mode;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@  static int fsl_spi_cpu_bufs(struct mpc8xxx_spi *mspi,
 				struct spi_transfer *t, unsigned int len)
 {
 	u32 word;
-	struct fsl_spi_reg *reg_base = mspi->reg_base;
+	struct fsl_spi_reg __iomem *reg_base = mspi->reg_base;
 
 	mspi->count = len;
 
@@ -309,7 +309,7 @@  static int fsl_spi_bufs(struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_transfer *t,
 			    bool is_dma_mapped)
 {
 	struct mpc8xxx_spi *mpc8xxx_spi = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
-	struct fsl_spi_reg *reg_base;
+	struct fsl_spi_reg __iomem *reg_base;
 	unsigned int len = t->len;
 	u8 bits_per_word;
 	int ret;
@@ -440,7 +440,7 @@  static int fsl_spi_do_one_msg(struct spi_master *master,
 static int fsl_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
 {
 	struct mpc8xxx_spi *mpc8xxx_spi;
-	struct fsl_spi_reg *reg_base;
+	struct fsl_spi_reg __iomem *reg_base;
 	int retval;
 	u32 hw_mode;
 	struct spi_mpc8xxx_cs *cs = spi_get_ctldata(spi);
@@ -495,7 +495,7 @@  static void fsl_spi_cleanup(struct spi_device *spi)
 
 static void fsl_spi_cpu_irq(struct mpc8xxx_spi *mspi, u32 events)
 {
-	struct fsl_spi_reg *reg_base = mspi->reg_base;
+	struct fsl_spi_reg __iomem *reg_base = mspi->reg_base;
 
 	/* We need handle RX first */
 	if (events & SPIE_NE) {
@@ -530,7 +530,7 @@  static irqreturn_t fsl_spi_irq(s32 irq, void *context_data)
 	struct mpc8xxx_spi *mspi = context_data;
 	irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE;
 	u32 events;
-	struct fsl_spi_reg *reg_base = mspi->reg_base;
+	struct fsl_spi_reg __iomem *reg_base = mspi->reg_base;
 
 	/* Get interrupt events(tx/rx) */
 	events = mpc8xxx_spi_read_reg(&reg_base->event);
@@ -550,7 +550,7 @@  static irqreturn_t fsl_spi_irq(s32 irq, void *context_data)
 static void fsl_spi_grlib_cs_control(struct spi_device *spi, bool on)
 {
 	struct mpc8xxx_spi *mpc8xxx_spi = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
-	struct fsl_spi_reg *reg_base = mpc8xxx_spi->reg_base;
+	struct fsl_spi_reg __iomem *reg_base = mpc8xxx_spi->reg_base;
 	u32 slvsel;
 	u16 cs = spi->chip_select;
 
@@ -568,7 +568,7 @@  static void fsl_spi_grlib_probe(struct device *dev)
 	struct fsl_spi_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(dev);
 	struct spi_master *master = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 	struct mpc8xxx_spi *mpc8xxx_spi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
-	struct fsl_spi_reg *reg_base = mpc8xxx_spi->reg_base;
+	struct fsl_spi_reg __iomem *reg_base = mpc8xxx_spi->reg_base;
 	int mbits;
 	u32 capabilities;
 
@@ -594,7 +594,7 @@  static struct spi_master *fsl_spi_probe(struct device *dev,
 	struct fsl_spi_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(dev);
 	struct spi_master *master;
 	struct mpc8xxx_spi *mpc8xxx_spi;
-	struct fsl_spi_reg *reg_base;
+	struct fsl_spi_reg __iomem *reg_base;
 	u32 regval;
 	int ret = 0;