@@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ static int vmx_set_guest_msr(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, struct vmx_uret_msr *msr, u64
u64 old_msr_data = msr->data;
msr->data = data;
- if (msr - vmx->guest_uret_msrs < vmx->save_nmsrs) {
+ if (msr - vmx->guest_uret_msrs < vmx->nr_active_uret_msrs) {
preempt_disable();
ret = kvm_set_user_return_msr(msr->index, msr->data, msr->mask);
preempt_enable();
@@ -1144,7 +1144,7 @@ void vmx_prepare_switch_to_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
*/
if (!vmx->guest_msrs_ready) {
vmx->guest_msrs_ready = true;
- for (i = 0; i < vmx->save_nmsrs; ++i)
+ for (i = 0; i < vmx->nr_active_uret_msrs; ++i)
kvm_set_user_return_msr(vmx->guest_uret_msrs[i].index,
vmx->guest_uret_msrs[i].data,
vmx->guest_uret_msrs[i].mask);
@@ -1728,9 +1728,9 @@ static void move_msr_up(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, int from, int to)
*/
static void setup_msrs(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
{
- int save_nmsrs, index;
+ int nr_active_uret_msrs, index;
- save_nmsrs = 0;
+ nr_active_uret_msrs = 0;
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
/*
* The SYSCALL MSRs are only needed on long mode guests, and only
@@ -1739,26 +1739,26 @@ static void setup_msrs(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
if (is_long_mode(&vmx->vcpu) && (vmx->vcpu.arch.efer & EFER_SCE)) {
index = __find_msr_index(vmx, MSR_STAR);
if (index >= 0)
- move_msr_up(vmx, index, save_nmsrs++);
+ move_msr_up(vmx, index, nr_active_uret_msrs++);
index = __find_msr_index(vmx, MSR_LSTAR);
if (index >= 0)
- move_msr_up(vmx, index, save_nmsrs++);
+ move_msr_up(vmx, index, nr_active_uret_msrs++);
index = __find_msr_index(vmx, MSR_SYSCALL_MASK);
if (index >= 0)
- move_msr_up(vmx, index, save_nmsrs++);
+ move_msr_up(vmx, index, nr_active_uret_msrs++);
}
#endif
index = __find_msr_index(vmx, MSR_EFER);
if (index >= 0 && update_transition_efer(vmx, index))
- move_msr_up(vmx, index, save_nmsrs++);
+ move_msr_up(vmx, index, nr_active_uret_msrs++);
index = __find_msr_index(vmx, MSR_TSC_AUX);
if (index >= 0 && guest_cpuid_has(&vmx->vcpu, X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP))
- move_msr_up(vmx, index, save_nmsrs++);
+ move_msr_up(vmx, index, nr_active_uret_msrs++);
index = __find_msr_index(vmx, MSR_IA32_TSX_CTRL);
if (index >= 0)
- move_msr_up(vmx, index, save_nmsrs++);
+ move_msr_up(vmx, index, nr_active_uret_msrs++);
- vmx->save_nmsrs = save_nmsrs;
+ vmx->nr_active_uret_msrs = nr_active_uret_msrs;
vmx->guest_msrs_ready = false;
if (cpu_has_vmx_msr_bitmap())
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ struct vcpu_vmx {
struct vmx_uret_msr guest_uret_msrs[MAX_NR_USER_RETURN_MSRS];
int nr_uret_msrs;
- int save_nmsrs;
+ int nr_active_uret_msrs;
bool guest_msrs_ready;
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
u64 msr_host_kernel_gs_base;
Add "uret" into the name of "save_nmsrs" to explicitly associate it with the guest_uret_msrs array, and replace "save" with "active" (for lack of a better word) to better describe what is being tracked. While "save" is more or less accurate when viewed as a literal description of the field, e.g. it holds the number of MSRs that were saved into the array the last time setup_msrs() was invoked, it can easily be misinterpreted by the reader, e.g. as meaning the number of MSRs that were saved from hardware at some point in the past, or as the number of MSRs that need to be saved at some point in the future, both of which are wrong. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> --- arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 22 +++++++++++----------- arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)