From patchwork Tue Jun 23 09:37:55 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ard Biesheuvel X-Patchwork-Id: 11620193 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69396138C for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 09:38:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mother.openwall.net (mother.openwall.net [195.42.179.200]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C775F20723 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 09:38:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="uT2lPca4" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C775F20723 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernel-hardening-return-19062-patchwork-kernel-hardening=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 22440 invoked by uid 550); 23 Jun 2020 09:38:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kernel-hardening-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Delivered-To: mailing list kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 22402 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2020 09:38:12 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1592905081; bh=mMyTdfqlEJCtK0nIyv1ZsiGElWiwcBv8MsUB3i8mgS0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=uT2lPca4Z/UX7Rc1st0ryL60dTMNezaWm8I8Ub5YsHp/n0CgrN+Kx2kRBKUU1C1UH Es9IaNFyNJ3UPizZZej1cpDgbTZFez9bBpJYWs/2lCPJXDK1bee+9yJakPgeRLc73v PcOlRk44qNpNi9rs3jEzu+YMDllg+pMNV9cw0UGA= From: Ard Biesheuvel To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, will@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, Ard Biesheuvel , "Jason A . Donenfeld" Subject: [RFC PATCH v2] arm64/acpi: disallow AML memory opregions to access kernel memory Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 11:37:55 +0200 Message-Id: <20200623093755.1534006-1-ardb@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 AML uses SystemMemory opregions to allow AML handlers to access MMIO registers of, e.g., GPIO controllers, or access reserved regions of memory that are owned by the firmware. Currently, we also allow AML access to memory that is owned by the kernel and mapped via the linear region, which does not seem to be supported by a valid use case, and exposes the kernel's internal state to AML methods that may be buggy and exploitable. On arm64, ACPI support requires booting in EFI mode, and so we can cross reference the requested region against the EFI memory map, rather than just do a minimal check on the first page. So let's only permit regions to be remapped by the ACPI core if - they don't appear in the EFI memory map at all (which is the case for most MMIO), or - they are covered by a single region in the EFI memory map, which is not of a type that describes memory that is given to the kernel at boot. Reported-by: Jason A. Donenfeld Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel --- v2: do a more elaborate check on the region, against the EFI memory map arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h | 15 +--- arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h index a45366c3909b..bd68e1b7f29f 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h @@ -47,20 +47,7 @@ pgprot_t __acpi_get_mem_attribute(phys_addr_t addr); /* ACPI table mapping after acpi_permanent_mmap is set */ -static inline void __iomem *acpi_os_ioremap(acpi_physical_address phys, - acpi_size size) -{ - /* For normal memory we already have a cacheable mapping. */ - if (memblock_is_map_memory(phys)) - return (void __iomem *)__phys_to_virt(phys); - - /* - * We should still honor the memory's attribute here because - * crash dump kernel possibly excludes some ACPI (reclaim) - * regions from memblock list. - */ - return __ioremap(phys, size, __acpi_get_mem_attribute(phys)); -} +void __iomem *acpi_os_ioremap(acpi_physical_address phys, acpi_size size); #define acpi_os_ioremap acpi_os_ioremap typedef u64 phys_cpuid_t; diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c index a7586a4db142..4696f765d1ac 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c @@ -261,6 +261,78 @@ pgprot_t __acpi_get_mem_attribute(phys_addr_t addr) return __pgprot(PROT_DEVICE_nGnRnE); } +void __iomem *acpi_os_ioremap(acpi_physical_address phys, acpi_size size) +{ + efi_memory_desc_t *md, *region = NULL; + pgprot_t prot; + + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!efi_enabled(EFI_MEMMAP))) + return NULL; + + for_each_efi_memory_desc(md) { + u64 end = md->phys_addr + (md->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT); + + if (phys < md->phys_addr || phys >= end) + continue; + + if (phys + size > end) { + pr_warn(FW_BUG "requested region covers multiple EFI memory regions\n"); + return NULL; + } + region = md; + break; + } + + /* + * It is fine for AML to remap regions that are not represented in the + * EFI memory map at all, as it only describes normal memory, and MMIO + * regions that require a virtual mapping to make them accessible to + * the EFI runtime services. + */ + prot = __pgprot(PROT_DEVICE_nGnRnE); + if (region) { + switch (region->type) { + case EFI_LOADER_CODE: + case EFI_LOADER_DATA: + case EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_CODE: + case EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA: + case EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY: + case EFI_PERSISTENT_MEMORY: + pr_warn(FW_BUG "requested region covers kernel memory @ %pa\n", &phys); + return NULL; + + case EFI_ACPI_RECLAIM_MEMORY: + /* + * ACPI reclaim memory is used to pass firmware tables + * and other data that is intended for consumption by + * the OS only, which may decide it wants to reclaim + * that memory and use it for something else. We never + * do that, but we add it to the linear map anyway, and + * so we must use the existing mapping. + */ + return (void __iomem *)__phys_to_virt(phys); + + case EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_CODE: + /* + * This would be unusual, but not problematic per se, + * as long as we take care not to create a writable + * mapping for executable code. + */ + prot = PAGE_KERNEL_RO; + break; + + default: + if (region->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_WB) + prot = PAGE_KERNEL; + else if (region->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_WT) + prot = __pgprot(PROT_NORMAL_WT); + else if (region->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_WC) + prot = __pgprot(PROT_NORMAL_NC); + } + } + return __ioremap(phys, size, prot); +} + /* * Claim Synchronous External Aborts as a firmware first notification. *