diff mbox series

[1/1] crypto: ux500: hash: Add namespacing to hash_init()

Message ID 20200629123003.1014387-1-lee.jones@linaro.org (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Delegated to: Herbert Xu
Headers show
Series [1/1] crypto: ux500: hash: Add namespacing to hash_init() | expand

Commit Message

Lee Jones June 29, 2020, 12:30 p.m. UTC
A recent change to the Regulator consumer API (which this driver
utilises) add prototypes for the some suspend functions.  These
functions require including header file include/linux/suspend.h.

The following tree of includes affecting this driver will be
present:

   In file included from include/linux/elevator.h:6,
                    from include/linux/blkdev.h:288,
                    from include/linux/blk-cgroup.h:23,
                    from include/linux/writeback.h:14,
                    from include/linux/memcontrol.h:22,
                    from include/linux/swap.h:9,
                    from include/linux/suspend.h:5,
                    from include/linux/regulator/consumer.h:35,
                    from drivers/crypto/ux500/hash/hash_core.c:28:

include/linux/elevator.h pulls in include/linux/hashtable.h which
contains its own version of hash_init().  This confuses the build
system and results in the following error (amongst others):

 drivers/crypto/ux500/hash/hash_core.c:1362:19: error: passing argument 1 of '__hash_init' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
 1362 |  return hash_init(req);

Fix this by namespacing the local hash_init() such that the
source of confusion is removed.

Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---

Ideally this should go into v5.8's -rcs else it runs the risk of
breaking when Linus pulls everything in for v5.9-rc1.

 drivers/crypto/ux500/hash/hash_core.c | 18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Comments

Herbert Xu June 30, 2020, 4:10 a.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 01:30:03PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> A recent change to the Regulator consumer API (which this driver
> utilises) add prototypes for the some suspend functions.  These
> functions require including header file include/linux/suspend.h.
> 
> The following tree of includes affecting this driver will be
> present:
> 
>    In file included from include/linux/elevator.h:6,
>                     from include/linux/blkdev.h:288,
>                     from include/linux/blk-cgroup.h:23,
>                     from include/linux/writeback.h:14,
>                     from include/linux/memcontrol.h:22,
>                     from include/linux/swap.h:9,
>                     from include/linux/suspend.h:5,
>                     from include/linux/regulator/consumer.h:35,
>                     from drivers/crypto/ux500/hash/hash_core.c:28:
> 
> include/linux/elevator.h pulls in include/linux/hashtable.h which
> contains its own version of hash_init().  This confuses the build
> system and results in the following error (amongst others):
> 
>  drivers/crypto/ux500/hash/hash_core.c:1362:19: error: passing argument 1 of '__hash_init' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
>  1362 |  return hash_init(req);
> 
> Fix this by namespacing the local hash_init() such that the
> source of confusion is removed.
> 
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> ---
> 
> Ideally this should go into v5.8's -rcs else it runs the risk of
> breaking when Linus pulls everything in for v5.9-rc1.

I have no objections to this patch.  However, I'd rather put
it on a topic branch which you could pull rather than pushing
it into 5.8 straight away.

I also dislike pulling in the kitchen sink when all you need in
consumer.h is the definition of suspend_state_t.  A better solution
would be to move the definition of suspend_state_t into linux/types.h
and including that instead of suspend.h in consumer.h.

Cheers,
Lee Jones June 30, 2020, 7:07 a.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, 30 Jun 2020, Herbert Xu wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 01:30:03PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > A recent change to the Regulator consumer API (which this driver
> > utilises) add prototypes for the some suspend functions.  These
> > functions require including header file include/linux/suspend.h.
> > 
> > The following tree of includes affecting this driver will be
> > present:
> > 
> >    In file included from include/linux/elevator.h:6,
> >                     from include/linux/blkdev.h:288,
> >                     from include/linux/blk-cgroup.h:23,
> >                     from include/linux/writeback.h:14,
> >                     from include/linux/memcontrol.h:22,
> >                     from include/linux/swap.h:9,
> >                     from include/linux/suspend.h:5,
> >                     from include/linux/regulator/consumer.h:35,
> >                     from drivers/crypto/ux500/hash/hash_core.c:28:
> > 
> > include/linux/elevator.h pulls in include/linux/hashtable.h which
> > contains its own version of hash_init().  This confuses the build
> > system and results in the following error (amongst others):
> > 
> >  drivers/crypto/ux500/hash/hash_core.c:1362:19: error: passing argument 1 of '__hash_init' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> >  1362 |  return hash_init(req);
> > 
> > Fix this by namespacing the local hash_init() such that the
> > source of confusion is removed.
> > 
> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
> > Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> > Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > 
> > Ideally this should go into v5.8's -rcs else it runs the risk of
> > breaking when Linus pulls everything in for v5.9-rc1.

[...]

> I also dislike pulling in the kitchen sink when all you need in
> consumer.h is the definition of suspend_state_t.  A better solution
> would be to move the definition of suspend_state_t into linux/types.h
> and including that instead of suspend.h in consumer.h.

IMHO, including (whole) headers into source/header files is the norm.
Even if only a small portion is actually referenced.  Very seldom do
consumers of an API use more than a fraction of what is available.
Whether it's a couple of function calls, a struct or a type.

Pulling headers apart and placing items in more convenient places
i.e. into headers which are more commonly included, messes with the
compartmentalisation of subsystems and sounds like more of a hack than
simply saying "to enable suspend functions we need to reference the
suspend API" like we are here.

> I have no objections to this patch.  However, I'd rather put
> it on a topic branch which you could pull rather than pushing
> it into 5.8 straight away.

An immutable branch sounds like a sensible solution.  Thanks.
Lee Jones July 7, 2020, 8:26 a.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, 30 Jun 2020, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jun 2020, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 01:30:03PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > A recent change to the Regulator consumer API (which this driver
> > > utilises) add prototypes for the some suspend functions.  These
> > > functions require including header file include/linux/suspend.h.
> > > 
> > > The following tree of includes affecting this driver will be
> > > present:
> > > 
> > >    In file included from include/linux/elevator.h:6,
> > >                     from include/linux/blkdev.h:288,
> > >                     from include/linux/blk-cgroup.h:23,
> > >                     from include/linux/writeback.h:14,
> > >                     from include/linux/memcontrol.h:22,
> > >                     from include/linux/swap.h:9,
> > >                     from include/linux/suspend.h:5,
> > >                     from include/linux/regulator/consumer.h:35,
> > >                     from drivers/crypto/ux500/hash/hash_core.c:28:
> > > 
> > > include/linux/elevator.h pulls in include/linux/hashtable.h which
> > > contains its own version of hash_init().  This confuses the build
> > > system and results in the following error (amongst others):
> > > 
> > >  drivers/crypto/ux500/hash/hash_core.c:1362:19: error: passing argument 1 of '__hash_init' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> > >  1362 |  return hash_init(req);
> > > 
> > > Fix this by namespacing the local hash_init() such that the
> > > source of confusion is removed.
> > > 
> > > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > > Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
> > > Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> > > Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
> > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > Ideally this should go into v5.8's -rcs else it runs the risk of
> > > breaking when Linus pulls everything in for v5.9-rc1.
> 
> [...]
> 
> > I have no objections to this patch.  However, I'd rather put
> > it on a topic branch which you could pull rather than pushing
> > it into 5.8 straight away.
> 
> An immutable branch sounds like a sensible solution.  Thanks.

Any movement on this Herbert?
Herbert Xu July 9, 2020, 12:53 p.m. UTC | #4
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 01:30:03PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> A recent change to the Regulator consumer API (which this driver
> utilises) add prototypes for the some suspend functions.  These
> functions require including header file include/linux/suspend.h.
> 
> The following tree of includes affecting this driver will be
> present:
> 
>    In file included from include/linux/elevator.h:6,
>                     from include/linux/blkdev.h:288,
>                     from include/linux/blk-cgroup.h:23,
>                     from include/linux/writeback.h:14,
>                     from include/linux/memcontrol.h:22,
>                     from include/linux/swap.h:9,
>                     from include/linux/suspend.h:5,
>                     from include/linux/regulator/consumer.h:35,
>                     from drivers/crypto/ux500/hash/hash_core.c:28:
> 
> include/linux/elevator.h pulls in include/linux/hashtable.h which
> contains its own version of hash_init().  This confuses the build
> system and results in the following error (amongst others):
> 
>  drivers/crypto/ux500/hash/hash_core.c:1362:19: error: passing argument 1 of '__hash_init' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
>  1362 |  return hash_init(req);
> 
> Fix this by namespacing the local hash_init() such that the
> source of confusion is removed.
> 
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> ---
> 
> Ideally this should go into v5.8's -rcs else it runs the risk of
> breaking when Linus pulls everything in for v5.9-rc1.
> 
>  drivers/crypto/ux500/hash/hash_core.c | 18 +++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Patch applied to ux500 branch.  Thanks.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/crypto/ux500/hash/hash_core.c b/drivers/crypto/ux500/hash/hash_core.c
index c24f2db8d5e83..a5ee8c2fb4e0b 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/ux500/hash/hash_core.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/ux500/hash/hash_core.c
@@ -545,7 +545,7 @@  static bool hash_dma_valid_data(struct scatterlist *sg, int datasize)
  *
  * Initialize structures.
  */
-static int hash_init(struct ahash_request *req)
+static int ux500_hash_init(struct ahash_request *req)
 {
 	struct crypto_ahash *tfm = crypto_ahash_reqtfm(req);
 	struct hash_ctx *ctx = crypto_ahash_ctx(tfm);
@@ -1359,7 +1359,7 @@  static int ahash_sha1_init(struct ahash_request *req)
 	ctx->config.oper_mode = HASH_OPER_MODE_HASH;
 	ctx->digestsize = SHA1_DIGEST_SIZE;
 
-	return hash_init(req);
+	return ux500_hash_init(req);
 }
 
 static int ahash_sha256_init(struct ahash_request *req)
@@ -1372,7 +1372,7 @@  static int ahash_sha256_init(struct ahash_request *req)
 	ctx->config.oper_mode = HASH_OPER_MODE_HASH;
 	ctx->digestsize = SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE;
 
-	return hash_init(req);
+	return ux500_hash_init(req);
 }
 
 static int ahash_sha1_digest(struct ahash_request *req)
@@ -1425,7 +1425,7 @@  static int hmac_sha1_init(struct ahash_request *req)
 	ctx->config.oper_mode	= HASH_OPER_MODE_HMAC;
 	ctx->digestsize		= SHA1_DIGEST_SIZE;
 
-	return hash_init(req);
+	return ux500_hash_init(req);
 }
 
 static int hmac_sha256_init(struct ahash_request *req)
@@ -1438,7 +1438,7 @@  static int hmac_sha256_init(struct ahash_request *req)
 	ctx->config.oper_mode	= HASH_OPER_MODE_HMAC;
 	ctx->digestsize		= SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE;
 
-	return hash_init(req);
+	return ux500_hash_init(req);
 }
 
 static int hmac_sha1_digest(struct ahash_request *req)
@@ -1515,7 +1515,7 @@  static struct hash_algo_template hash_algs[] = {
 		.conf.algorithm = HASH_ALGO_SHA1,
 		.conf.oper_mode = HASH_OPER_MODE_HASH,
 		.hash = {
-			.init = hash_init,
+			.init = ux500_hash_init,
 			.update = ahash_update,
 			.final = ahash_final,
 			.digest = ahash_sha1_digest,
@@ -1538,7 +1538,7 @@  static struct hash_algo_template hash_algs[] = {
 		.conf.algorithm	= HASH_ALGO_SHA256,
 		.conf.oper_mode	= HASH_OPER_MODE_HASH,
 		.hash = {
-			.init = hash_init,
+			.init = ux500_hash_init,
 			.update	= ahash_update,
 			.final = ahash_final,
 			.digest = ahash_sha256_digest,
@@ -1561,7 +1561,7 @@  static struct hash_algo_template hash_algs[] = {
 		.conf.algorithm = HASH_ALGO_SHA1,
 		.conf.oper_mode = HASH_OPER_MODE_HMAC,
 			.hash = {
-			.init = hash_init,
+			.init = ux500_hash_init,
 			.update = ahash_update,
 			.final = ahash_final,
 			.digest = hmac_sha1_digest,
@@ -1585,7 +1585,7 @@  static struct hash_algo_template hash_algs[] = {
 		.conf.algorithm = HASH_ALGO_SHA256,
 		.conf.oper_mode = HASH_OPER_MODE_HMAC,
 		.hash = {
-			.init = hash_init,
+			.init = ux500_hash_init,
 			.update = ahash_update,
 			.final = ahash_final,
 			.digest = hmac_sha256_digest,