diff mbox

[1/3] MTD: at91: atmel_nand: for PMECC, add code to choose the ecc bits and sector size according to the ONFI parameter ECC requirement.

Message ID 1355912840-29501-2-git-send-email-josh.wu@atmel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Josh Wu Dec. 19, 2012, 10:27 a.m. UTC
This patch will check NAND flash's ecc minimum requirement in ONFI parameter. If it is equal or smaller than pmecc-cap in dtsi, then use ecc_bits in ONFI. otherwise, return an error since pmecc-cap in dtsi don't meet the ecc minimum reqirement.

This patch also check sector size (codeword) requirement in ONFI. If it is equal or bigger than sector_size in dtsi, then use the one of ONFI. otherwise return error.

Currently we don't support to read the ECC parameter in ONFI extended parameter page. So in that case we just use the value specified in dts.

For non-ONFI nand flash, we assume the minimum ecc requirement is 2bits in 512 bytes.

Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>
---
 drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c |   89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 89 insertions(+)

Comments

Artem Bityutskiy Jan. 15, 2013, 12:26 p.m. UTC | #1
I cannot compile this patch:

ERROR (phandle_references): Reference to non-existent node or label "pinctrl_ssc0_tx"

ERROR: Input tree has errors, aborting (use -f to force output)
make[2]: *** [arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9g20ek.dtb] Error 2


On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 18:27 +0800, Josh Wu wrote:
> This patch will check NAND flash's ecc minimum requirement in ONFI parameter. If it is equal or smaller than pmecc-cap in dtsi, then use ecc_bits in ONFI. otherwise, return an error since pmecc-cap in dtsi don't meet the ecc minimum reqirement.
> 
> This patch also check sector size (codeword) requirement in ONFI. If it is equal or bigger than sector_size in dtsi, then use the one of ONFI. otherwise return error.
> 
> Currently we don't support to read the ECC parameter in ONFI extended parameter page. So in that case we just use the value specified in dts.
> 
> For non-ONFI nand flash, we assume the minimum ecc requirement is 2bits in 512 bytes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>

Please, wrap the lines like kernel developers usually do.
Bo Shen Jan. 16, 2013, 1:50 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Artem Bityutskiy,

On 1/15/2013 20:26, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> I cannot compile this patch:
>
> ERROR (phandle_references): Reference to non-existent node or label "pinctrl_ssc0_tx"
>
> ERROR: Input tree has errors, aborting (use -f to force output)
> make[2]: *** [arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9g20ek.dtb] Error 2

Sorry for this inconvenience.
There are patches doesn't go to mainline in time which cause this issue.

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1966321/
[2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1966341/

Best Regards,
Bo Shen


>
> On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 18:27 +0800, Josh Wu wrote:
>> This patch will check NAND flash's ecc minimum requirement in ONFI parameter. If it is equal or smaller than pmecc-cap in dtsi, then use ecc_bits in ONFI. otherwise, return an error since pmecc-cap in dtsi don't meet the ecc minimum reqirement.
>>
>> This patch also check sector size (codeword) requirement in ONFI. If it is equal or bigger than sector_size in dtsi, then use the one of ONFI. otherwise return error.
>>
>> Currently we don't support to read the ECC parameter in ONFI extended parameter page. So in that case we just use the value specified in dts.
>>
>> For non-ONFI nand flash, we assume the minimum ecc requirement is 2bits in 512 bytes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>
>
> Please, wrap the lines like kernel developers usually do.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
Josh Wu Jan. 16, 2013, 8:28 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi, Artem

On 1/15/2013 8:26 PM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> I cannot compile this patch:
>
> ERROR (phandle_references): Reference to non-existent node or label "pinctrl_ssc0_tx"
>
> ERROR: Input tree has errors, aborting (use -f to force output)
> make[2]: *** [arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9g20ek.dtb] Error 2

As Bo Shen already mentioned, they are caused by ssc pinctrl patches. it 
will be merged in next rc or late.

>
> On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 18:27 +0800, Josh Wu wrote:
>> This patch will check NAND flash's ecc minimum requirement in ONFI parameter. If it is equal or smaller than pmecc-cap in dtsi, then use ecc_bits in ONFI. otherwise, return an error since pmecc-cap in dtsi don't meet the ecc minimum reqirement.
>>
>> This patch also check sector size (codeword) requirement in ONFI. If it is equal or bigger than sector_size in dtsi, then use the one of ONFI. otherwise return error.
>>
>> Currently we don't support to read the ECC parameter in ONFI extended parameter page. So in that case we just use the value specified in dts.
>>
>> For non-ONFI nand flash, we assume the minimum ecc requirement is 2bits in 512 bytes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>
> Please, wrap the lines like kernel developers usually do.

OK. I will resend the whole patch series with wrapped commit message. 
thanks.

Best Regards,
Josh Wu
>
Artem Bityutskiy Jan. 17, 2013, 11:54 a.m. UTC | #4
On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 16:28 +0800, Josh Wu wrote:
> Hi, Artem
> 
> On 1/15/2013 8:26 PM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > I cannot compile this patch:
> >
> > ERROR (phandle_references): Reference to non-existent node or label "pinctrl_ssc0_tx"
> >
> > ERROR: Input tree has errors, aborting (use -f to force output)
> > make[2]: *** [arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9g20ek.dtb] Error 2
> 
> As Bo Shen already mentioned, they are caused by ssc pinctrl patches. it 
> will be merged in next rc or late.

Then ping me when the patches are ready to go, please.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
index 9144557..7855ccd 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
@@ -901,6 +901,84 @@  static void atmel_pmecc_core_init(struct mtd_info *mtd)
 	pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CTRL, PMECC_CTRL_ENABLE);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Get ECC requirement in ONFI parameters, returns -1 if ONFI
+ * parameters is not supported.
+ * return 0 if success to get the ECC requirement.
+ */
+static int get_onfi_ecc_param(struct nand_chip *chip,
+		int *ecc_bits, int *sector_size)
+{
+	*ecc_bits = *sector_size = 0;
+
+	if (chip->onfi_params.ecc_bits == 0xff)
+		/* TODO: the sector_size and ecc_bits need to be find in
+		 * extended ecc parameter, currently we don't support it.
+		 */
+		return -1;
+
+	*ecc_bits = chip->onfi_params.ecc_bits;
+
+	/* The default sector size (ecc codeword size) is 512 */
+	*sector_size = 512;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Choose ecc cap and sector size in atmel_nand_host according to ONFI
+ * parameters ecc requirement.
+ * return 0 if success. otherwise return error code.
+ */
+static int pmecc_choose_ecc_bits(struct atmel_nand_host *host,
+		struct nand_chip *chip)
+{
+	int ecc_bits, sector_size;
+
+	if (!get_onfi_ecc_param(chip, &ecc_bits, &sector_size)) {
+		dev_info(host->dev, "ONFI params, minimum required ECC: %dbits in %d bytes\n",
+				ecc_bits, sector_size);
+
+		if (ecc_bits > host->pmecc_corr_cap) {
+			dev_err(host->dev, "Error: Need to set a bigger pmecc-cap in dts. Current is: %d\n",
+				host->pmecc_corr_cap);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+		if (sector_size < host->pmecc_sector_size) {
+			dev_err(host->dev, "Error: Need to set a smaller pmecc-sector-size in dts. Current is: %d\n",
+					host->pmecc_sector_size);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
+		/* use the most fitable ecc bits (the near bigger one ) */
+		if (ecc_bits <= 2)
+			host->pmecc_corr_cap = 2;
+		else if (ecc_bits <= 4)
+			host->pmecc_corr_cap = 4;
+		else if (ecc_bits < 8)
+			host->pmecc_corr_cap = 8;
+		else if (ecc_bits < 12)
+			host->pmecc_corr_cap = 12;
+		else if (ecc_bits < 24)
+			host->pmecc_corr_cap = 24;
+		else
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		/* use the most fitable sector size (the near smaller one ) */
+		if (sector_size >= 1024)
+			host->pmecc_sector_size = 1024;
+		else if (sector_size >= 512)
+			host->pmecc_sector_size = 512;
+		else
+			return -EINVAL;
+	} else {
+		dev_info(host->dev,
+		"NAND chip ECC reqirement is in Extended ONFI parameter, we don't support yet. So use default setting in dts\n");
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int __init atmel_pmecc_nand_init_params(struct platform_device *pdev,
 					 struct atmel_nand_host *host)
 {
@@ -909,8 +987,19 @@  static int __init atmel_pmecc_nand_init_params(struct platform_device *pdev,
 	struct resource *regs, *regs_pmerr, *regs_rom;
 	int cap, sector_size, err_no;
 
+	if (nand_chip->onfi_version) {
+		/* Choose ecc cap and sector size base on ONFI parameters */
+		err_no = pmecc_choose_ecc_bits(host, nand_chip);
+		if (err_no)
+			return err_no;
+	} else {
+		dev_info(host->dev, "NAND chip is not ONFI compliant, assume ecc_bits is 2");
+		host->pmecc_corr_cap = 2;
+	}
+
 	cap = host->pmecc_corr_cap;
 	sector_size = host->pmecc_sector_size;
+
 	dev_info(host->dev, "Initialize PMECC params, cap: %d, sector: %d\n",
 		 cap, sector_size);