| Message ID | 514AA503.4060101@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable |
| Headers | show |
On 2013?03?21? 14:13, Wang Sheng-Hui wrote: > _require_nobigloopfs has been removed. > We should use _require_no_large_scratch_dev in the test script. > > Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com> > --- > 276 | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/276 b/276 > index 40b30cf..87363ca 100755 > --- a/276 > +++ b/276 > @@ -58,8 +58,7 @@ _need_to_be_root > _supported_fs btrfs > _supported_os Linux > _require_scratch > - > -_require_nobigloopfs > +_require_no_large_scratch_dev > _require_btrfs inspect-internal > _require_command "/usr/sbin/filefrag" > Does anyone notice this? I use the upstream xfstests and failed this case for the already-removed function. I think someone patched in but mixed the old function. I've send out this patch for days, but seems no one cares about it. If I'm wrong, please let me know. Thanks, -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/276 b/276 index 40b30cf..87363ca 100755 --- a/276 +++ b/276 @@ -58,8 +58,7 @@ _need_to_be_root _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch - -_require_nobigloopfs +_require_no_large_scratch_dev _require_btrfs inspect-internal _require_command "/usr/sbin/filefrag"
_require_nobigloopfs has been removed. We should use _require_no_large_scratch_dev in the test script. Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com> --- 276 | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)