diff mbox

Input: gpio_keys - wakeup_trigger

Message ID 1379109160-32437-1-git-send-email-bleung@chromium.org (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Benson Leung Sept. 13, 2013, 9:52 p.m. UTC
Allow wakeup_trigger to be defined per gpio button. Currently, all
gpio buttons are set up as IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING.
It may be more appropriate to only wake the system on one edge, for example
if the gpio is for a Lid Switch.

Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio_keys.txt         |  7 +++++++
 drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c                 | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++--
 include/linux/gpio_keys.h                          |  3 +++
 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Doug Anderson Sept. 13, 2013, 11:56 p.m. UTC | #1
Benson,

On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org> wrote:
> Allow wakeup_trigger to be defined per gpio button. Currently, all
> gpio buttons are set up as IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING.
> It may be more appropriate to only wake the system on one edge, for example
> if the gpio is for a Lid Switch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>

As discussed out of band, I'd tend to put the masking/error checking
in gpio_keys_get_devtree_pdata() then just rely on non-DT users not to
pass in nonsense, but I don't feel that strongly about it, so:

Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Tomasz Figa Sept. 14, 2013, 12:16 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi Benson,

On Friday 13 of September 2013 14:52:40 Benson Leung wrote:
> Allow wakeup_trigger to be defined per gpio button. Currently, all
> gpio buttons are set up as IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING.
> It may be more appropriate to only wake the system on one edge, for
> example if the gpio is for a Lid Switch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio_keys.txt         |  7 +++++++
>  drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c                 | 23
> ++++++++++++++++++++-- include/linux/gpio_keys.h                       
>   |  3 +++
>  3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio_keys.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio_keys.txt index
> 5c2c021..243f569 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio_keys.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio_keys.txt
> @@ -20,6 +20,13 @@ Optional subnode-properties:
>  	- debounce-interval: Debouncing interval time in milliseconds.
>  	  If not specified defaults to 5.
>  	- gpio-key,wakeup: Boolean, button can wake-up the system.
> +	- gpio-key,wakeup-trigger : Specifies the type of wakeup behavior.
> +	  <1> == Rising Edge Trigger
> +	  <2> == Falling Edge Trigger
> +	  <3> == Both Rising and Falling Edge Trigger
> +	  <4> == Level High Trigger
> +	  <8> == Level Low Trigger
> +	  If not specified, defaults to <3> == Both Rising and Falling.

I don't like two things in this patch.

First is that this looks completely like a configuration option, not 
hardware description, so it's not something that should be put into DT. 
Especially that users might want to use another wake-up trigger depending 
on their use cases. I'd rather see this as a sysfs entry.

Another thing is that this driver assumes that key events are indicated by 
edges on the GPIO line, so I don't think level trigger setting make any 
sense here. I'd rather allow three settings here (through a sysfs knob) - 
key down, key up, key down or up.

Best regards,
Tomasz

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Benson Leung Sept. 19, 2013, 8:43 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi Tomasz,

On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 5:16 AM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't like two things in this patch.
>
> First is that this looks completely like a configuration option, not
> hardware description, so it's not something that should be put into DT.
> Especially that users might want to use another wake-up trigger depending
> on their use cases. I'd rather see this as a sysfs entry.
>
> Another thing is that this driver assumes that key events are indicated by
> edges on the GPIO line, so I don't think level trigger setting make any
> sense here. I'd rather allow three settings here (through a sysfs knob) -
> key down, key up, key down or up.

Thanks for your feedback. I agree with your suggestions. I will move
this from platform data and DT to a sysfs property with three settings
: rising, falling, both.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio_keys.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio_keys.txt
index 5c2c021..243f569 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio_keys.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio_keys.txt
@@ -20,6 +20,13 @@  Optional subnode-properties:
 	- debounce-interval: Debouncing interval time in milliseconds.
 	  If not specified defaults to 5.
 	- gpio-key,wakeup: Boolean, button can wake-up the system.
+	- gpio-key,wakeup-trigger : Specifies the type of wakeup behavior.
+	  <1> == Rising Edge Trigger
+	  <2> == Falling Edge Trigger
+	  <3> == Both Rising and Falling Edge Trigger
+	  <4> == Level High Trigger
+	  <8> == Level Low Trigger
+	  If not specified, defaults to <3> == Both Rising and Falling.
 
 Example nodes:
 
diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c
index 440ce32..28b6992 100644
--- a/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c
+++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@  struct gpio_button_data {
 	spinlock_t lock;
 	bool disabled;
 	bool key_pressed;
+	unsigned long irqflags;
 };
 
 struct gpio_keys_drvdata {
@@ -493,6 +494,8 @@  static int gpio_keys_setup_key(struct platform_device *pdev,
 		irqflags = 0;
 	}
 
+	bdata->irqflags = irqflags;
+
 	input_set_capability(input, button->type ?: EV_KEY, button->code);
 
 	/*
@@ -643,6 +646,9 @@  gpio_keys_get_devtree_pdata(struct device *dev)
 		if (of_property_read_u32(pp, "debounce-interval",
 					 &button->debounce_interval))
 			button->debounce_interval = 5;
+
+		of_property_read_u32(pp, "gpio-key,wakeup-trigger",
+				     &button->wakeup_trigger);
 	}
 
 	if (pdata->nbuttons == 0) {
@@ -811,8 +817,14 @@  static int gpio_keys_suspend(struct device *dev)
 	if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) {
 		for (i = 0; i < ddata->pdata->nbuttons; i++) {
 			struct gpio_button_data *bdata = &ddata->data[i];
-			if (bdata->button->wakeup)
+			if (bdata->button->wakeup) {
+				unsigned int flags;
+				flags = bdata->button->wakeup_trigger &
+					IRQF_TRIGGER_MASK;
+				if (flags && flags != bdata->irqflags)
+					irq_set_irq_type(bdata->irq, flags);
 				enable_irq_wake(bdata->irq);
+			}
 		}
 	} else {
 		mutex_lock(&input->mutex);
@@ -834,8 +846,15 @@  static int gpio_keys_resume(struct device *dev)
 	if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) {
 		for (i = 0; i < ddata->pdata->nbuttons; i++) {
 			struct gpio_button_data *bdata = &ddata->data[i];
-			if (bdata->button->wakeup)
+			if (bdata->button->wakeup) {
+				unsigned int flags;
+				flags = bdata->button->wakeup_trigger &
+					IRQF_TRIGGER_MASK;
 				disable_irq_wake(bdata->irq);
+				if (flags && flags != bdata->irqflags)
+					irq_set_irq_type(bdata->irq,
+							 bdata->irqflags);
+			}
 		}
 	} else {
 		mutex_lock(&input->mutex);
diff --git a/include/linux/gpio_keys.h b/include/linux/gpio_keys.h
index a7e977f..d8d5a4f 100644
--- a/include/linux/gpio_keys.h
+++ b/include/linux/gpio_keys.h
@@ -15,6 +15,9 @@  struct gpio_keys_button {
 	bool can_disable;
 	int value;		/* axis value for EV_ABS */
 	unsigned int irq;	/* Irq number in case of interrupt keys */
+
+	/* trigger value (IRQF_TRIGGER_*) while used as a wake-up source */
+	unsigned int wakeup_trigger;
 };
 
 struct gpio_keys_platform_data {