| Message ID | 1397252175-14227-3-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:35:59PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Checking for both an irq number _and_ whether it's enabled is > redundant. Originally I've thought the drm_dev_to_irq call would break > drivers which do their own irq checking, but those shouldn't have > DRIVER_HAVE_IRQ set as Thierry Reding pointed out. But such drivers > already need to set dev->irq_enabled for other reasons, so we might as > well ditch that check, too. > > v2: Also drop the HAVE_IRQ check. > > Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c | 5 ++--- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c index bd6e65fde1b9..7ef98c01c3d5 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c @@ -1160,9 +1160,8 @@ int drm_wait_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, int ret; unsigned int flags, seq, crtc, high_crtc; - if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_HAVE_IRQ)) - if ((!drm_dev_to_irq(dev)) || (!dev->irq_enabled)) - return -EINVAL; + if (!dev->irq_enabled) + return -EINVAL; if (vblwait->request.type & _DRM_VBLANK_SIGNAL) return -EINVAL;
Checking for both an irq number _and_ whether it's enabled is redundant. Originally I've thought the drm_dev_to_irq call would break drivers which do their own irq checking, but those shouldn't have DRIVER_HAVE_IRQ set as Thierry Reding pointed out. But such drivers already need to set dev->irq_enabled for other reasons, so we might as well ditch that check, too. v2: Also drop the HAVE_IRQ check. Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)