diff mbox

Btrfs-progs: let btrfs-image actually work on a balanced fs

Message ID 1411678015-5928-1-git-send-email-jbacik@fb.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Josef Bacik Sept. 25, 2014, 8:46 p.m. UTC
We use the read extent buffer infrastructure to read the super block when we are
creating a btrfs-image.  This works out fine most of the time except when the fs
has been balanced, then it fails to map the super block.  So we could fix
btrfs-image to read in the super in a special way, but thats more code.  So
instead just check in the eb reading code if we are reading the super and then
don't bother mapping the block, just read the actual offset.  This fixed some
poor guy who was trying to btrfs-image his fs that had been balanced.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
---
 btrfs-image.c | 5 ++++-
 disk-io.c     | 3 ++-
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Zach Brown Sept. 25, 2014, 9:44 p.m. UTC | #1
> --- a/btrfs-image.c
> +++ b/btrfs-image.c
> @@ -1020,6 +1020,9 @@ static int copy_tree_blocks(struct btrfs_root *root, struct extent_buffer *eb,
>  	int i = 0;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	if (btrfs_header_bytenr(eb) == 65536)
> +		printf("We have bytenr 65536, belongs to %llu, level %d\n",
> +		       btrfs_header_owner(eb), btrfs_header_level(eb));
>  	ret = add_extent(btrfs_header_bytenr(eb), root->leafsize, metadump, 0);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		fprintf(stderr, "Error adding metadata block\n");

Did you mean to leave that in?  The raw super offset sure makes it look
like debugging output.

- z
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Josef Bacik Sept. 26, 2014, 1 p.m. UTC | #2
On 09/25/2014 05:44 PM, Zach Brown wrote:
>> --- a/btrfs-image.c
>> +++ b/btrfs-image.c
>> @@ -1020,6 +1020,9 @@ static int copy_tree_blocks(struct btrfs_root *root, struct extent_buffer *eb,
>>   	int i = 0;
>>   	int ret;
>>
>> +	if (btrfs_header_bytenr(eb) == 65536)
>> +		printf("We have bytenr 65536, belongs to %llu, level %d\n",
>> +		       btrfs_header_owner(eb), btrfs_header_level(eb));
>>   	ret = add_extent(btrfs_header_bytenr(eb), root->leafsize, metadump, 0);
>>   	if (ret) {
>>   		fprintf(stderr, "Error adding metadata block\n");
>
> Did you mean to leave that in?  The raw super offset sure makes it look
> like debugging output.
>

Sigh sorry, thought I culled everything.  Thanks,

Josef

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/btrfs-image.c b/btrfs-image.c
index cb17f16..6643ad1 100644
--- a/btrfs-image.c
+++ b/btrfs-image.c
@@ -1020,6 +1020,9 @@  static int copy_tree_blocks(struct btrfs_root *root, struct extent_buffer *eb,
 	int i = 0;
 	int ret;
 
+	if (btrfs_header_bytenr(eb) == 65536)
+		printf("We have bytenr 65536, belongs to %llu, level %d\n",
+		       btrfs_header_owner(eb), btrfs_header_level(eb));
 	ret = add_extent(btrfs_header_bytenr(eb), root->leafsize, metadump, 0);
 	if (ret) {
 		fprintf(stderr, "Error adding metadata block\n");
@@ -1279,7 +1282,7 @@  static int create_metadump(const char *input, FILE *out, int num_threads,
 	}
 
 	ret = add_extent(BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET, BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_SIZE,
-			&metadump, 0);
+			&metadump, 1);
 	if (ret) {
 		fprintf(stderr, "Error adding metadata %d\n", ret);
 		err = ret;
diff --git a/disk-io.c b/disk-io.c
index 26a532e..34c0a97 100644
--- a/disk-io.c
+++ b/disk-io.c
@@ -201,7 +201,8 @@  int read_whole_eb(struct btrfs_fs_info *info, struct extent_buffer *eb, int mirr
 		read_len = bytes_left;
 		device = NULL;
 
-		if (!info->on_restoring) {
+		if (!info->on_restoring &&
+		    eb->start != BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET) {
 			ret = btrfs_map_block(&info->mapping_tree, READ,
 					      eb->start + offset, &read_len, &multi,
 					      mirror, NULL);