diff mbox

[RFC,1/2] pm: Add PM domain notifications

Message ID 1418286387-9663-2-git-send-email-tfiga@chromium.org (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Tomasz Figa Dec. 11, 2014, 8:26 a.m. UTC
From: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>

This patch adds notifiers to the runtime PM/genpd subsystem. It is now
possible to register a notifier, which will be called before and after
the generic power domain subsystem calls the power domain's power_on
and power_off callbacks.

Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
[tfiga@chromium.org: rebased]
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
---
 Documentation/power/notifiers.txt | 14 +++++++++++
 drivers/base/power/domain.c       | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/pm_domain.h         | 20 ++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 84 insertions(+)

Comments

Hi Tomasz,

On 11/12/14 09:26, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> From: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
> 
> This patch adds notifiers to the runtime PM/genpd subsystem. It is now
> possible to register a notifier, which will be called before and after
> the generic power domain subsystem calls the power domain's power_on
> and power_off callbacks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
> [tfiga@chromium.org: rebased]
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>

Not sure if you've noticed it, I posted an updated version of this patch
recently [1]. The notifiers list is moved to struct generic_pm_domain
there and it also allows to register a notifier for selected power domain
by name.
Tomasz Figa Dec. 11, 2014, 11:04 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Sylwester,

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki
<s.nawrocki@samsung.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Tomasz,
>
> On 11/12/14 09:26, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > From: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
> >
> > This patch adds notifiers to the runtime PM/genpd subsystem. It is now
> > possible to register a notifier, which will be called before and after
> > the generic power domain subsystem calls the power domain's power_on
> > and power_off callbacks.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
> > [tfiga@chromium.org: rebased]
> > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
>
> Not sure if you've noticed it, I posted an updated version of this patch
> recently [1]. The notifiers list is moved to struct generic_pm_domain
> there and it also allows to register a notifier for selected power domain
> by name.
[snip]
> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg38549.html

Ah, haven't noticed, sorry. The API using devices looks the same, so I
guess we can simply have patch 2/2 of this series applied on top of
your patch.

By the way, look-up by name (presumably hardcoded somewhere?) sounds a
bit strange to me. What was the reason for it to be added?

Best regards,
Tomasz
On 11/12/14 12:04, Tomasz Figa wrote:
...
>> > On 11/12/14 09:26, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>> > > From: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
>>> > >
>>> > > This patch adds notifiers to the runtime PM/genpd subsystem. It is now
>>> > > possible to register a notifier, which will be called before and after
>>> > > the generic power domain subsystem calls the power domain's power_on
>>> > > and power_off callbacks.
>>> > >
>>> > > Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
>>> > > [tfiga@chromium.org: rebased]
>>> > > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
>> >
>> > Not sure if you've noticed it, I posted an updated version of this patch
>> > recently [1]. The notifiers list is moved to struct generic_pm_domain
>> > there and it also allows to register a notifier for selected power domain
>> > by name.
> [snip]
>> > [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg38549.html
>
> Ah, haven't noticed, sorry. The API using devices looks the same, so I
> guess we can simply have patch 2/2 of this series applied on top of
> your patch.

Yes, that should work.

> By the way, look-up by name (presumably hardcoded somewhere?) sounds a
> bit strange to me. What was the reason for it to be added?

Yes, that might not be a very elegant approach. We initially used it
to implement power domain on/off sequence per specific domain and SoC,
since it appeared resistant to generalize.  I.e. the control register
write sequences are different per domain and per SoC (exynos).
So we named the domains in the device tree in that way:

	pm_domains: pm-domains@10024000 {
		compatible = "samsung,exynos4415-pd";
		reg-names = "cam", "tv", "mfc", "g3d",
		            "lcd0", "isp0", "isp1";
		reg = <0x10024000 0x20>, <0x10024020 0x20>,
		      <0x10024040 0x20>, <0x10024060 0x20>,
		      <0x10024080 0x20>, <0x100240A0 0x20>,
		      <0x100240E0 0x20>;
		#power-domain-cells = <1>;
	};

and then, for example, in the exynos CMU_ISP{0, 1} (clock controller)
driver registered for notification on "isp0" and "isp1" power domains
("isp1" is a sub-domain of "isp0" and the consumer devices are normally
attached to "isp1").

We have been investigating if we could do without the notification
at the clocks driver side, then the all SoC/power domain specific code
would end up in the exynos power domain driver. But I'm afraid it's
not going to work for all SoCs. Anyway lookup by name might be not
needed.


--
Regards,
Sylwester
Ulf Hansson Dec. 11, 2014, 3:30 p.m. UTC | #4
On 11 December 2014 at 14:54, Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> wrote:
> On 11/12/14 12:04, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> ...
>>> > On 11/12/14 09:26, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>>> > > From: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
>>>> > >
>>>> > > This patch adds notifiers to the runtime PM/genpd subsystem. It is now
>>>> > > possible to register a notifier, which will be called before and after
>>>> > > the generic power domain subsystem calls the power domain's power_on
>>>> > > and power_off callbacks.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
>>>> > > [tfiga@chromium.org: rebased]
>>>> > > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
>>> >
>>> > Not sure if you've noticed it, I posted an updated version of this patch
>>> > recently [1]. The notifiers list is moved to struct generic_pm_domain
>>> > there and it also allows to register a notifier for selected power domain
>>> > by name.
>> [snip]
>>> > [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg38549.html
>>
>> Ah, haven't noticed, sorry. The API using devices looks the same, so I
>> guess we can simply have patch 2/2 of this series applied on top of
>> your patch.
>
> Yes, that should work.
>
>> By the way, look-up by name (presumably hardcoded somewhere?) sounds a
>> bit strange to me. What was the reason for it to be added?
>
> Yes, that might not be a very elegant approach. We initially used it
> to implement power domain on/off sequence per specific domain and SoC,
> since it appeared resistant to generalize.  I.e. the control register
> write sequences are different per domain and per SoC (exynos).
> So we named the domains in the device tree in that way:
>
>         pm_domains: pm-domains@10024000 {
>                 compatible = "samsung,exynos4415-pd";
>                 reg-names = "cam", "tv", "mfc", "g3d",
>                             "lcd0", "isp0", "isp1";
>                 reg = <0x10024000 0x20>, <0x10024020 0x20>,
>                       <0x10024040 0x20>, <0x10024060 0x20>,
>                       <0x10024080 0x20>, <0x100240A0 0x20>,
>                       <0x100240E0 0x20>;
>                 #power-domain-cells = <1>;
>         };
>
> and then, for example, in the exynos CMU_ISP{0, 1} (clock controller)
> driver registered for notification on "isp0" and "isp1" power domains
> ("isp1" is a sub-domain of "isp0" and the consumer devices are normally
> attached to "isp1").
>
> We have been investigating if we could do without the notification
> at the clocks driver side, then the all SoC/power domain specific code
> would end up in the exynos power domain driver. But I'm afraid it's
> not going to work for all SoCs. Anyway lookup by name might be not
> needed.

Regarding "lookup by name", let's please move away from those APIs. I
am planning to remove all name based API from the genpd API as soon as
I can.

If you need to fetch domains, this might help you:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg383743.html

Kind regards
Uffe
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/power/notifiers.txt b/Documentation/power/notifiers.txt
index a81fa25..62303f6 100644
--- a/Documentation/power/notifiers.txt
+++ b/Documentation/power/notifiers.txt
@@ -53,3 +53,17 @@  NULL).  To register and/or unregister a suspend notifier use the functions
 register_pm_notifier() and unregister_pm_notifier(), respectively, defined in
 include/linux/suspend.h .  If you don't need to unregister the notifier, you can
 also use the pm_notifier() macro defined in include/linux/suspend.h .
+
+Power Domain notifiers
+----------------------
+
+The power domain notifiers allow subsystems or drivers to register for power
+domain on/off notifications, should they need to perform any actions right
+before or right after the power domain on/off.  The device must be already
+added to a power domain before its subsystem or driver registers the notifier.
+Following events are supported:
+
+PM_GENPD_POWER_ON_PREPARE	The power domain is about to turn on.
+PM_GENPD_POST_POWER_ON		The power domain has just turned on.
+PM_GENPD_POWER_OFF_PREPARE	The power domain is about to turn off.
+PM_GENPD_POST_POWER_OFF		The power domain has just turned off.
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
index 6a103a3..0d6f84e 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
@@ -68,6 +68,45 @@  static struct generic_pm_domain *pm_genpd_lookup_name(const char *domain_name)
 	return genpd;
 }
 
+int pm_genpd_register_notifier(struct device *dev, struct notifier_block *nb)
+{
+	struct pm_domain_data *pdd;
+	int ret = -EINVAL;
+
+	spin_lock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
+	if (dev->power.subsys_data) {
+		pdd = dev->power.subsys_data->domain_data;
+		ret = blocking_notifier_chain_register(&pdd->notify_chain_head,
+						       nb);
+	}
+	spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
+	return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_genpd_register_notifier);
+
+void pm_genpd_unregister_notifier(struct device *dev, struct notifier_block *nb)
+{
+	struct pm_domain_data *pdd;
+
+	spin_lock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
+	if (dev->power.subsys_data) {
+		pdd = dev->power.subsys_data->domain_data;
+		blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(&pdd->notify_chain_head, nb);
+	}
+	spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_genpd_unregister_notifier);
+
+static void pm_genpd_notifier_call(unsigned long event,
+				   struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
+{
+	struct pm_domain_data *pdd;
+
+	list_for_each_entry(pdd, &genpd->dev_list, list_node)
+		blocking_notifier_call_chain(&pdd->notify_chain_head,
+					     event, pdd->dev);
+}
+
 struct generic_pm_domain *dev_to_genpd(struct device *dev)
 {
 	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev->pm_domain))
@@ -161,12 +200,17 @@  static int genpd_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
 	if (!genpd->power_on)
 		return 0;
 
+	pm_genpd_notifier_call(PM_GENPD_POWER_ON_PREPARE, genpd);
+
 	time_start = ktime_get();
 	ret = genpd->power_on(genpd);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
 	elapsed_ns = ktime_to_ns(ktime_sub(ktime_get(), time_start));
+
+	pm_genpd_notifier_call(PM_GENPD_POST_POWER_ON, genpd);
+
 	if (elapsed_ns <= genpd->power_on_latency_ns)
 		return ret;
 
@@ -188,12 +232,17 @@  static int genpd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
 	if (!genpd->power_off)
 		return 0;
 
+	pm_genpd_notifier_call(PM_GENPD_POWER_OFF_PREPARE, genpd);
+
 	time_start = ktime_get();
 	ret = genpd->power_off(genpd);
 	if (ret == -EBUSY)
 		return ret;
 
 	elapsed_ns = ktime_to_ns(ktime_sub(ktime_get(), time_start));
+
+	pm_genpd_notifier_call(PM_GENPD_POST_POWER_OFF, genpd);
+
 	if (elapsed_ns <= genpd->power_off_latency_ns)
 		return ret;
 
@@ -1466,6 +1515,7 @@  int __pm_genpd_add_device(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, struct device *dev,
 		genpd->attach_dev(genpd, dev);
 
 	mutex_lock(&gpd_data->lock);
+	BLOCKING_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&gpd_data->base.notify_chain_head);
 	gpd_data->base.dev = dev;
 	list_add_tail(&gpd_data->base.list_node, &genpd->dev_list);
 	gpd_data->need_restore = -1;
diff --git a/include/linux/pm_domain.h b/include/linux/pm_domain.h
index 6cd20d5..356a145 100644
--- a/include/linux/pm_domain.h
+++ b/include/linux/pm_domain.h
@@ -20,6 +20,12 @@ 
 /* Defines used for the flags field in the struct generic_pm_domain */
 #define GENPD_FLAG_PM_CLK	(1U << 0) /* PM domain uses PM clk */
 
+/* PM domain state transition notifications */
+#define PM_GENPD_POWER_ON_PREPARE	0x01
+#define PM_GENPD_POST_POWER_ON		0x02
+#define PM_GENPD_POWER_OFF_PREPARE	0x03
+#define PM_GENPD_POST_POWER_OFF		0x04
+
 enum gpd_status {
 	GPD_STATE_ACTIVE = 0,	/* PM domain is active */
 	GPD_STATE_WAIT_MASTER,	/* PM domain's master is being waited for */
@@ -107,6 +113,7 @@  struct gpd_timing_data {
 struct pm_domain_data {
 	struct list_head list_node;
 	struct device *dev;
+	struct blocking_notifier_head notify_chain_head;
 };
 
 struct generic_pm_domain_data {
@@ -159,6 +166,11 @@  extern int pm_genpd_name_poweron(const char *domain_name);
 extern void pm_genpd_poweroff_unused(void);
 
 extern struct dev_power_governor simple_qos_governor;
+extern int pm_genpd_register_notifier(struct device *dev,
+				      struct notifier_block *nb);
+extern void pm_genpd_unregister_notifier(struct device *dev,
+					struct notifier_block *nb);
+
 extern struct dev_power_governor pm_domain_always_on_gov;
 #else
 
@@ -232,6 +244,14 @@  static inline int pm_genpd_name_poweron(const char *domain_name)
 	return -ENOSYS;
 }
 static inline void pm_genpd_poweroff_unused(void) {}
+static inline int pm_genpd_register_notifier(struct device *dev,
+					struct notifier_block *nb)
+{
+	return -ENOSYS;
+}
+static inline void pm_genpd_unregister_notifier(struct device *dev,
+					 struct notifier_block *nb) {}
+
 #define simple_qos_governor NULL
 #define pm_domain_always_on_gov NULL
 #endif