diff mbox

drm/rockchip: vop: power off until vop standby take effect

Message ID 1422693698-21944-1-git-send-email-mark.yao@rock-chips.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

yao mark Jan. 31, 2015, 8:41 a.m. UTC
Vop standby will take effect end of current frame,
if dsp_hold_valid_irq happen, it means vop standby complete.

we must wait standby complete when we want to disable aclk,
if not, memory bus maybe dead.

Signed-off-by: Mark Yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c |   76 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Comments

Heiko Stuebner Jan. 31, 2015, 12:49 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Mark,

Am Samstag, 31. Januar 2015, 16:41:38 schrieb Mark Yao:
> Vop standby will take effect end of current frame,
> if dsp_hold_valid_irq happen, it means vop standby complete.
> 
> we must wait standby complete when we want to disable aclk,
> if not, memory bus maybe dead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c |   76
> ++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 13
> deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c index fb25836..47ea61f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ struct vop {
>  	/* mutex vsync_ work */
>  	struct mutex vsync_mutex;
>  	bool vsync_work_pending;
> +	struct completion dsp_hold_completion;
> 
>  	const struct vop_data *data;
> 
> @@ -382,6 +383,34 @@ static bool is_alpha_support(uint32_t format)
>  	}
>  }
> 
> +static void vop_dsp_hold_valid_irq_enable(struct vop *vop)
> +{
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	BUG_ON(!vop->is_enabled);

BUG_ON is generally not well liked in general error handling - i.e. in the
	 !vop->is_enabled
bad things may happen, but this may not always be the case. And BUG_ON 
effectively kills the machine.

You could simply use a WARN_ON, so people see that something really strange is 
going on but can still try to recover things.


> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&vop->irq_lock, flags);
> +
> +	vop_mask_write(vop, INTR_CTRL0, DSP_HOLD_VALID_INTR_MASK,
> +		       DSP_HOLD_VALID_INTR_EN(1));
> +
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vop->irq_lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static void vop_dsp_hold_valid_irq_disable(struct vop *vop)
> +{
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	BUG_ON(!vop->is_enabled);

same here

> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&vop->irq_lock, flags);
> +
> +	vop_mask_write(vop, INTR_CTRL0, DSP_HOLD_VALID_INTR_MASK,
> +		       DSP_HOLD_VALID_INTR_EN(0));
> +
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vop->irq_lock, flags);
> +}
> +
>  static void vop_enable(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
>  {
>  	struct vop *vop = to_vop(crtc);


except the above
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>

[but take it with a grain of salt, as I'm still new to drm-land :-) ]


Heiko
yao mark Feb. 2, 2015, 12:45 a.m. UTC | #2
On 2015?01?31? 20:49, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Am Samstag, 31. Januar 2015, 16:41:38 schrieb Mark Yao:
>> Vop standby will take effect end of current frame,
>> if dsp_hold_valid_irq happen, it means vop standby complete.
>>
>> we must wait standby complete when we want to disable aclk,
>> if not, memory bus maybe dead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mark Yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c |   76
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 13
>> deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c index fb25836..47ea61f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
>> @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ struct vop {
>>   	/* mutex vsync_ work */
>>   	struct mutex vsync_mutex;
>>   	bool vsync_work_pending;
>> +	struct completion dsp_hold_completion;
>>
>>   	const struct vop_data *data;
>>
>> @@ -382,6 +383,34 @@ static bool is_alpha_support(uint32_t format)
>>   	}
>>   }
>>
>> +static void vop_dsp_hold_valid_irq_enable(struct vop *vop)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> +	BUG_ON(!vop->is_enabled);
> BUG_ON is generally not well liked in general error handling - i.e. in the
> 	 !vop->is_enabled
> bad things may happen, but this may not always be the case. And BUG_ON
> effectively kills the machine.
>
> You could simply use a WARN_ON, so people see that something really strange is
> going on but can still try to recover things.
Right, got it.
>
>> +
>> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&vop->irq_lock, flags);
>> +
>> +	vop_mask_write(vop, INTR_CTRL0, DSP_HOLD_VALID_INTR_MASK,
>> +		       DSP_HOLD_VALID_INTR_EN(1));
>> +
>> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vop->irq_lock, flags);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void vop_dsp_hold_valid_irq_disable(struct vop *vop)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> +	BUG_ON(!vop->is_enabled);
> same here
>
>> +
>> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&vop->irq_lock, flags);
>> +
>> +	vop_mask_write(vop, INTR_CTRL0, DSP_HOLD_VALID_INTR_MASK,
>> +		       DSP_HOLD_VALID_INTR_EN(0));
>> +
>> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vop->irq_lock, flags);
>> +}
>> +
>>   static void vop_enable(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
>>   {
>>   	struct vop *vop = to_vop(crtc);
>
> except the above
> Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
>
> [but take it with a grain of salt, as I'm still new to drm-land :-) ]
Good, I saw your drm patches, I'm interested in those, very good.

Mark
>
> Heiko
>
>
>
Daniel Kurtz Feb. 2, 2015, 2:07 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi Mark, Heiko,

On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Mark Yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com> wrote:
> Vop standby will take effect end of current frame,
> if dsp_hold_valid_irq happen, it means vop standby complete.
>
> we must wait standby complete when we want to disable aclk,
> if not, memory bus maybe dead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c |   76 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> index fb25836..47ea61f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ struct vop {
>         /* mutex vsync_ work */
>         struct mutex vsync_mutex;
>         bool vsync_work_pending;
> +       struct completion dsp_hold_completion;
>
>         const struct vop_data *data;
>
> @@ -382,6 +383,34 @@ static bool is_alpha_support(uint32_t format)
>         }
>  }
>
> +static void vop_dsp_hold_valid_irq_enable(struct vop *vop)
> +{
> +       unsigned long flags;
> +
> +       BUG_ON(!vop->is_enabled);

Re: Heiko "use a WARN_ON":

If the VOP clock is off, then the system will just hang when trying to
write the VOP register so in this case, BUG_ON gives a more reliable
crash dump than the hang.

> +
> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&vop->irq_lock, flags);
> +
> +       vop_mask_write(vop, INTR_CTRL0, DSP_HOLD_VALID_INTR_MASK,
> +                      DSP_HOLD_VALID_INTR_EN(1));
> +
> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vop->irq_lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static void vop_dsp_hold_valid_irq_disable(struct vop *vop)
> +{
> +       unsigned long flags;
> +
> +       BUG_ON(!vop->is_enabled);
> +
> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&vop->irq_lock, flags);
> +
> +       vop_mask_write(vop, INTR_CTRL0, DSP_HOLD_VALID_INTR_MASK,
> +                      DSP_HOLD_VALID_INTR_EN(0));
> +
> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vop->irq_lock, flags);
> +}
> +
>  static void vop_enable(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
>  {
>         struct vop *vop = to_vop(crtc);
> @@ -454,26 +483,36 @@ static void vop_disable(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
>
>         drm_vblank_off(crtc->dev, vop->pipe);
>
> -       disable_irq(vop->irq);
> -
>         /*
> -        * TODO: Since standby doesn't take effect until the next vblank,
> -        * when we turn off dclk below, the vop is probably still active.
> +        * Vop standby will take effect until end of current frame,

"Vop standby will take effect at end of current frame"

> +        * if dsp hold valid irq happen, it means standby complete.
> +        *
> +        * we must wait standby complete when we want to disable aclk,
> +        * if not, memory bus maybe dead.
>          */
> +       reinit_completion(&vop->dsp_hold_completion);
> +       vop_dsp_hold_valid_irq_enable(vop);
> +
>         spin_lock(&vop->reg_lock);
>
>         VOP_CTRL_SET(vop, standby, 1);
>
>         spin_unlock(&vop->reg_lock);
>
> +       wait_for_completion(&vop->dsp_hold_completion);
> +
> +       vop_dsp_hold_valid_irq_disable(vop);
> +
> +       disable_irq(vop->irq);
> +
>         vop->is_enabled = false;
> +
>         /*
> -        * disable dclk to stop frame scan, so we can safely detach iommu,
> +        * vop standby complete, so iommu detach is safe.
>          */
> -       clk_disable(vop->dclk);
> -
>         rockchip_drm_dma_detach_device(vop->drm_dev, vop->dev);
>
> +       clk_disable(vop->dclk);
>         clk_disable(vop->aclk);
>         clk_disable(vop->hclk);
>  }
> @@ -1086,6 +1125,7 @@ static irqreturn_t vop_isr(int irq, void *data)
>         struct vop *vop = data;
>         uint32_t intr0_reg, active_irqs;
>         unsigned long flags;
> +       int ret = IRQ_NONE;
>
>         /*
>          * INTR_CTRL0 register has interrupt status, enable and clear bits, we
> @@ -1104,15 +1144,24 @@ static irqreturn_t vop_isr(int irq, void *data)
>         if (!active_irqs)
>                 return IRQ_NONE;
>
> -       /* Only Frame Start Interrupt is enabled; other irqs are spurious. */
> -       if (!(active_irqs & FS_INTR)) {
> -               DRM_ERROR("Unknown VOP IRQs: %#02x\n", active_irqs);
> -               return IRQ_NONE;
> +       if (active_irqs & DSP_HOLD_VALID_INTR) {
> +               if (!completion_done(&vop->dsp_hold_completion))

Why is this "completion_done" check needed?
I guess it doesn't help, but isn't strictly needed, since the
dsp_hold_completion is a one shot, right?

In any case, this should work as it is, so:

Reviewed-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>

> +                       complete(&vop->dsp_hold_completion);
> +               active_irqs &= ~DSP_HOLD_VALID_INTR;
> +               ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
>         }
>
> -       drm_handle_vblank(vop->drm_dev, vop->pipe);
> +       if (active_irqs & FS_INTR) {
> +               drm_handle_vblank(vop->drm_dev, vop->pipe);
> +               active_irqs &= ~FS_INTR;
> +               ret = (vop->vsync_work_pending) ? IRQ_WAKE_THREAD : IRQ_HANDLED;
> +       }
>
> -       return (vop->vsync_work_pending) ? IRQ_WAKE_THREAD : IRQ_HANDLED;
> +       /* Unhandled irqs are spurious. */
> +       if (active_irqs)
> +               DRM_ERROR("Unknown VOP IRQs: %#02x\n", active_irqs);
> +
> +       return ret;
>  }
>
>  static int vop_create_crtc(struct vop *vop)
> @@ -1194,6 +1243,7 @@ static int vop_create_crtc(struct vop *vop)
>                 goto err_cleanup_crtc;
>         }
>
> +       init_completion(&vop->dsp_hold_completion);
>         crtc->port = port;
>         vop->pipe = drm_crtc_index(crtc);
>         rockchip_register_crtc_funcs(drm_dev, &private_crtc_funcs, vop->pipe);
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
>
yao mark Feb. 2, 2015, 2:30 a.m. UTC | #4
On 2015?02?02? 10:07, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> Hi Mark, Heiko,
>
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Mark Yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com> wrote:
>> Vop standby will take effect end of current frame,
>> if dsp_hold_valid_irq happen, it means vop standby complete.
>>
>> we must wait standby complete when we want to disable aclk,
>> if not, memory bus maybe dead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mark Yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c |   76 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>   1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
>> index fb25836..47ea61f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
>> @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ struct vop {
>>          /* mutex vsync_ work */
>>          struct mutex vsync_mutex;
>>          bool vsync_work_pending;
>> +       struct completion dsp_hold_completion;
>>
>>          const struct vop_data *data;
>>
>> @@ -382,6 +383,34 @@ static bool is_alpha_support(uint32_t format)
>>          }
>>   }
>>
>> +static void vop_dsp_hold_valid_irq_enable(struct vop *vop)
>> +{
>> +       unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> +       BUG_ON(!vop->is_enabled);
> Re: Heiko "use a WARN_ON":
>
> If the VOP clock is off, then the system will just hang when trying to
> write the VOP register so in this case, BUG_ON gives a more reliable
> crash dump than the hang.
   In this way, you are right, if vop clocks is disabled, write vop 
register will hang system, and the WARN_ON
crash dump may be have no chance to print.
>    
>> +
>> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&vop->irq_lock, flags);
>> +
>> +       vop_mask_write(vop, INTR_CTRL0, DSP_HOLD_VALID_INTR_MASK,
>> +                      DSP_HOLD_VALID_INTR_EN(1));
>> +
>> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vop->irq_lock, flags);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void vop_dsp_hold_valid_irq_disable(struct vop *vop)
>> +{
>> +       unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> +       BUG_ON(!vop->is_enabled);
>> +
>> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&vop->irq_lock, flags);
>> +
>> +       vop_mask_write(vop, INTR_CTRL0, DSP_HOLD_VALID_INTR_MASK,
>> +                      DSP_HOLD_VALID_INTR_EN(0));
>> +
>> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vop->irq_lock, flags);
>> +}
>> +
>>   static void vop_enable(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
>>   {
>>          struct vop *vop = to_vop(crtc);
>> @@ -454,26 +483,36 @@ static void vop_disable(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
>>
>>          drm_vblank_off(crtc->dev, vop->pipe);
>>
>> -       disable_irq(vop->irq);
>> -
>>          /*
>> -        * TODO: Since standby doesn't take effect until the next vblank,
>> -        * when we turn off dclk below, the vop is probably still active.
>> +        * Vop standby will take effect until end of current frame,
> "Vop standby will take effect at end of current frame"
OK
>> +        * if dsp hold valid irq happen, it means standby complete.
>> +        *
>> +        * we must wait standby complete when we want to disable aclk,
>> +        * if not, memory bus maybe dead.
>>           */
>> +       reinit_completion(&vop->dsp_hold_completion);
>> +       vop_dsp_hold_valid_irq_enable(vop);
>> +
>>          spin_lock(&vop->reg_lock);
>>
>>          VOP_CTRL_SET(vop, standby, 1);
>>
>>          spin_unlock(&vop->reg_lock);
>>
>> +       wait_for_completion(&vop->dsp_hold_completion);
>> +
>> +       vop_dsp_hold_valid_irq_disable(vop);
>> +
>> +       disable_irq(vop->irq);
>> +
>>          vop->is_enabled = false;
>> +
>>          /*
>> -        * disable dclk to stop frame scan, so we can safely detach iommu,
>> +        * vop standby complete, so iommu detach is safe.
>>           */
>> -       clk_disable(vop->dclk);
>> -
>>          rockchip_drm_dma_detach_device(vop->drm_dev, vop->dev);
>>
>> +       clk_disable(vop->dclk);
>>          clk_disable(vop->aclk);
>>          clk_disable(vop->hclk);
>>   }
>> @@ -1086,6 +1125,7 @@ static irqreturn_t vop_isr(int irq, void *data)
>>          struct vop *vop = data;
>>          uint32_t intr0_reg, active_irqs;
>>          unsigned long flags;
>> +       int ret = IRQ_NONE;
>>
>>          /*
>>           * INTR_CTRL0 register has interrupt status, enable and clear bits, we
>> @@ -1104,15 +1144,24 @@ static irqreturn_t vop_isr(int irq, void *data)
>>          if (!active_irqs)
>>                  return IRQ_NONE;
>>
>> -       /* Only Frame Start Interrupt is enabled; other irqs are spurious. */
>> -       if (!(active_irqs & FS_INTR)) {
>> -               DRM_ERROR("Unknown VOP IRQs: %#02x\n", active_irqs);
>> -               return IRQ_NONE;
>> +       if (active_irqs & DSP_HOLD_VALID_INTR) {
>> +               if (!completion_done(&vop->dsp_hold_completion))
> Why is this "completion_done" check needed?
> I guess it doesn't help, but isn't strictly needed, since the
> dsp_hold_completion is a one shot, right?
Right, the DSP_HOLD_VALID_INTR only happen when standby complete, one 
standby one irq.

Mark
> In any case, this should work as it is, so:
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>
>
>> +                       complete(&vop->dsp_hold_completion);
>> +               active_irqs &= ~DSP_HOLD_VALID_INTR;
>> +               ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
>>          }
>>
>> -       drm_handle_vblank(vop->drm_dev, vop->pipe);
>> +       if (active_irqs & FS_INTR) {
>> +               drm_handle_vblank(vop->drm_dev, vop->pipe);
>> +               active_irqs &= ~FS_INTR;
>> +               ret = (vop->vsync_work_pending) ? IRQ_WAKE_THREAD : IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +       }
>>
>> -       return (vop->vsync_work_pending) ? IRQ_WAKE_THREAD : IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +       /* Unhandled irqs are spurious. */
>> +       if (active_irqs)
>> +               DRM_ERROR("Unknown VOP IRQs: %#02x\n", active_irqs);
>> +
>> +       return ret;
>>   }
>>
>>   static int vop_create_crtc(struct vop *vop)
>> @@ -1194,6 +1243,7 @@ static int vop_create_crtc(struct vop *vop)
>>                  goto err_cleanup_crtc;
>>          }
>>
>> +       init_completion(&vop->dsp_hold_completion);
>>          crtc->port = port;
>>          vop->pipe = drm_crtc_index(crtc);
>>          rockchip_register_crtc_funcs(drm_dev, &private_crtc_funcs, vop->pipe);
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>>
>>
>
>
Daniel Vetter Feb. 2, 2015, 7:53 a.m. UTC | #5
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 10:30:09AM +0800, Mark yao wrote:
> On 2015?02?02? 10:07, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> >Hi Mark, Heiko,
> >
> >On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Mark Yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com> wrote:
> >>Vop standby will take effect end of current frame,
> >>if dsp_hold_valid_irq happen, it means vop standby complete.
> >>
> >>we must wait standby complete when we want to disable aclk,
> >>if not, memory bus maybe dead.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Mark Yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com>
> >>---
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c |   76 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >>  1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> >>index fb25836..47ea61f 100644
> >>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> >>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> >>@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ struct vop {
> >>         /* mutex vsync_ work */
> >>         struct mutex vsync_mutex;
> >>         bool vsync_work_pending;
> >>+       struct completion dsp_hold_completion;
> >>
> >>         const struct vop_data *data;
> >>
> >>@@ -382,6 +383,34 @@ static bool is_alpha_support(uint32_t format)
> >>         }
> >>  }
> >>
> >>+static void vop_dsp_hold_valid_irq_enable(struct vop *vop)
> >>+{
> >>+       unsigned long flags;
> >>+
> >>+       BUG_ON(!vop->is_enabled);
> >Re: Heiko "use a WARN_ON":
> >
> >If the VOP clock is off, then the system will just hang when trying to
> >write the VOP register so in this case, BUG_ON gives a more reliable
> >crash dump than the hang.
>   In this way, you are right, if vop clocks is disabled, write vop register
> will hang system, and the WARN_ON

if (WARN_ON(cond))
	return;

is what we commonly use in i915. Because it's really not any good to use
BUG_ON in drm drivers, at least if you expect anyone to use fbcon on top
of it (i.e. anything even remotely resembling a normal distro): Then the
intial modeset is all done under console_lock, which means that _none_ of
your BUG_ON will ever get out over serial console.

The problem is fbcon locking, but no fool yet signed up to fix it (it's
horrible, I looked ...).
-Daniel
yao mark Feb. 4, 2015, 3:38 a.m. UTC | #6
On 2015?02?02? 15:53, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 10:30:09AM +0800, Mark yao wrote:
>> On 2015?02?02? 10:07, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
>>> Hi Mark, Heiko,
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Mark Yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com> wrote:
>>>> Vop standby will take effect end of current frame,
>>>> if dsp_hold_valid_irq happen, it means vop standby complete.
>>>>
>>>> we must wait standby complete when we want to disable aclk,
>>>> if not, memory bus maybe dead.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Mark Yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c |   76 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>>>   1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
>>>> index fb25836..47ea61f 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
>>>> @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ struct vop {
>>>>          /* mutex vsync_ work */
>>>>          struct mutex vsync_mutex;
>>>>          bool vsync_work_pending;
>>>> +       struct completion dsp_hold_completion;
>>>>
>>>>          const struct vop_data *data;
>>>>
>>>> @@ -382,6 +383,34 @@ static bool is_alpha_support(uint32_t format)
>>>>          }
>>>>   }
>>>>
>>>> +static void vop_dsp_hold_valid_irq_enable(struct vop *vop)
>>>> +{
>>>> +       unsigned long flags;
>>>> +
>>>> +       BUG_ON(!vop->is_enabled);
>>> Re: Heiko "use a WARN_ON":
>>>
>>> If the VOP clock is off, then the system will just hang when trying to
>>> write the VOP register so in this case, BUG_ON gives a more reliable
>>> crash dump than the hang.
>>    In this way, you are right, if vop clocks is disabled, write vop register
>> will hang system, and the WARN_ON
> if (WARN_ON(cond))
> 	return;
>
> is what we commonly use in i915. Because it's really not any good to use
> BUG_ON in drm drivers, at least if you expect anyone to use fbcon on top
> of it (i.e. anything even remotely resembling a normal distro): Then the
> intial modeset is all done under console_lock, which means that _none_ of
> your BUG_ON will ever get out over serial console.
>
> The problem is fbcon locking, but no fool yet signed up to fix it (it's
> horrible, I looked ...).
> -Daniel
I know this problem, if fbcon locking, and BUG_ON, we can't get any log 
from serial console, Trouble
me many times. So know, if no drm log output, the first thing I do is 
remove the fbcon lock, and then
we can see the crash dump.

But here, I expect to use BUG_ON, because if BUG happen, vop register 
will hang system, and WARN_ON
may be have no chance to output.

Mark
Daniel Kurtz Feb. 4, 2015, 3:48 a.m. UTC | #7
On Feb 4, 2015 11:38 AM, "Mark yao" <mark.yao@rock-chips.com> wrote:
>
> On 2015?02?02? 15:53, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 10:30:09AM +0800, Mark yao wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2015?02?02? 10:07, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Mark, Heiko,
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Mark Yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Vop standby will take effect end of current frame,
>>>>> if dsp_hold_valid_irq happen, it means vop standby complete.
>>>>>
>>>>> we must wait standby complete when we want to disable aclk,
>>>>> if not, memory bus maybe dead.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Mark Yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c |   76 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>>>>   1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
>>>>> index fb25836..47ea61f 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
>>>>> @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ struct vop {
>>>>>          /* mutex vsync_ work */
>>>>>          struct mutex vsync_mutex;
>>>>>          bool vsync_work_pending;
>>>>> +       struct completion dsp_hold_completion;
>>>>>
>>>>>          const struct vop_data *data;
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -382,6 +383,34 @@ static bool is_alpha_support(uint32_t format)
>>>>>          }
>>>>>   }
>>>>>
>>>>> +static void vop_dsp_hold_valid_irq_enable(struct vop *vop)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +       unsigned long flags;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +       BUG_ON(!vop->is_enabled);
>>>>
>>>> Re: Heiko "use a WARN_ON":
>>>>
>>>> If the VOP clock is off, then the system will just hang when trying to
>>>> write the VOP register so in this case, BUG_ON gives a more reliable
>>>> crash dump than the hang.
>>>
>>>    In this way, you are right, if vop clocks is disabled, write vop register
>>> will hang system, and the WARN_ON
>>
>> if (WARN_ON(cond))
>>         return;
>>
>> is what we commonly use in i915. Because it's really not any good to use
>> BUG_ON in drm drivers, at least if you expect anyone to use fbcon on top
>> of it (i.e. anything even remotely resembling a normal distro): Then the
>> intial modeset is all done under console_lock, which means that _none_ of
>> your BUG_ON will ever get out over serial console.
>>
>> The problem is fbcon locking, but no fool yet signed up to fix it (it's
>> horrible, I looked ...).
>> -Daniel
>
> I know this problem, if fbcon locking, and BUG_ON, we can't get any log from serial console, Trouble
> me many times. So know, if no drm log output, the first thing I do is remove the fbcon lock, and then
> we can see the crash dump.
>
> But here, I expect to use BUG_ON, because if BUG happen, vop register will hang system, and WARN_ON
> may be have no chance to output.

Yeah, but danvet is suggesting we just return immediately on the
WARN_ON condition, to avoid accessing the vop registers and hanging.

Thus, the WARN_ON will have a chance to put out (unless the early
return path goes off and finds some other unprotected path goes to
access unlocked registers).

-Dan

>
> Mark
>
yao mark Feb. 4, 2015, 3:56 a.m. UTC | #8
On 2015?02?04? 11:48, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> On Feb 4, 2015 11:38 AM, "Mark yao" <mark.yao@rock-chips.com> wrote:
>> On 2015?02?02? 15:53, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 10:30:09AM +0800, Mark yao wrote:
>>>> On 2015?02?02? 10:07, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
>>>>> Hi Mark, Heiko,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Mark Yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Vop standby will take effect end of current frame,
>>>>>> if dsp_hold_valid_irq happen, it means vop standby complete.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> we must wait standby complete when we want to disable aclk,
>>>>>> if not, memory bus maybe dead.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Mark Yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c |   76 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>>>>>    1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
>>>>>> index fb25836..47ea61f 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
>>>>>> @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ struct vop {
>>>>>>           /* mutex vsync_ work */
>>>>>>           struct mutex vsync_mutex;
>>>>>>           bool vsync_work_pending;
>>>>>> +       struct completion dsp_hold_completion;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>           const struct vop_data *data;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> @@ -382,6 +383,34 @@ static bool is_alpha_support(uint32_t format)
>>>>>>           }
>>>>>>    }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +static void vop_dsp_hold_valid_irq_enable(struct vop *vop)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> +       unsigned long flags;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +       BUG_ON(!vop->is_enabled);
>>>>> Re: Heiko "use a WARN_ON":
>>>>>
>>>>> If the VOP clock is off, then the system will just hang when trying to
>>>>> write the VOP register so in this case, BUG_ON gives a more reliable
>>>>> crash dump than the hang.
>>>>     In this way, you are right, if vop clocks is disabled, write vop register
>>>> will hang system, and the WARN_ON
>>> if (WARN_ON(cond))
>>>          return;
>>>
>>> is what we commonly use in i915. Because it's really not any good to use
>>> BUG_ON in drm drivers, at least if you expect anyone to use fbcon on top
>>> of it (i.e. anything even remotely resembling a normal distro): Then the
>>> intial modeset is all done under console_lock, which means that _none_ of
>>> your BUG_ON will ever get out over serial console.
>>>
>>> The problem is fbcon locking, but no fool yet signed up to fix it (it's
>>> horrible, I looked ...).
>>> -Daniel
>> I know this problem, if fbcon locking, and BUG_ON, we can't get any log from serial console, Trouble
>> me many times. So know, if no drm log output, the first thing I do is remove the fbcon lock, and then
>> we can see the crash dump.
>>
>> But here, I expect to use BUG_ON, because if BUG happen, vop register will hang system, and WARN_ON
>> may be have no chance to output.
> Yeah, but danvet is suggesting we just return immediately on the
> WARN_ON condition, to avoid accessing the vop registers and hanging.
>
> Thus, the WARN_ON will have a chance to put out (unless the early
> return path goes off and finds some other unprotected path goes to
> access unlocked registers).
>
> -Dan
All right, I got it.
>> Mark
>>
>
>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
index fb25836..47ea61f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@  struct vop {
 	/* mutex vsync_ work */
 	struct mutex vsync_mutex;
 	bool vsync_work_pending;
+	struct completion dsp_hold_completion;
 
 	const struct vop_data *data;
 
@@ -382,6 +383,34 @@  static bool is_alpha_support(uint32_t format)
 	}
 }
 
+static void vop_dsp_hold_valid_irq_enable(struct vop *vop)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	BUG_ON(!vop->is_enabled);
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&vop->irq_lock, flags);
+
+	vop_mask_write(vop, INTR_CTRL0, DSP_HOLD_VALID_INTR_MASK,
+		       DSP_HOLD_VALID_INTR_EN(1));
+
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vop->irq_lock, flags);
+}
+
+static void vop_dsp_hold_valid_irq_disable(struct vop *vop)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	BUG_ON(!vop->is_enabled);
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&vop->irq_lock, flags);
+
+	vop_mask_write(vop, INTR_CTRL0, DSP_HOLD_VALID_INTR_MASK,
+		       DSP_HOLD_VALID_INTR_EN(0));
+
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vop->irq_lock, flags);
+}
+
 static void vop_enable(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
 {
 	struct vop *vop = to_vop(crtc);
@@ -454,26 +483,36 @@  static void vop_disable(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
 
 	drm_vblank_off(crtc->dev, vop->pipe);
 
-	disable_irq(vop->irq);
-
 	/*
-	 * TODO: Since standby doesn't take effect until the next vblank,
-	 * when we turn off dclk below, the vop is probably still active.
+	 * Vop standby will take effect until end of current frame,
+	 * if dsp hold valid irq happen, it means standby complete.
+	 *
+	 * we must wait standby complete when we want to disable aclk,
+	 * if not, memory bus maybe dead.
 	 */
+	reinit_completion(&vop->dsp_hold_completion);
+	vop_dsp_hold_valid_irq_enable(vop);
+
 	spin_lock(&vop->reg_lock);
 
 	VOP_CTRL_SET(vop, standby, 1);
 
 	spin_unlock(&vop->reg_lock);
 
+	wait_for_completion(&vop->dsp_hold_completion);
+
+	vop_dsp_hold_valid_irq_disable(vop);
+
+	disable_irq(vop->irq);
+
 	vop->is_enabled = false;
+
 	/*
-	 * disable dclk to stop frame scan, so we can safely detach iommu,
+	 * vop standby complete, so iommu detach is safe.
 	 */
-	clk_disable(vop->dclk);
-
 	rockchip_drm_dma_detach_device(vop->drm_dev, vop->dev);
 
+	clk_disable(vop->dclk);
 	clk_disable(vop->aclk);
 	clk_disable(vop->hclk);
 }
@@ -1086,6 +1125,7 @@  static irqreturn_t vop_isr(int irq, void *data)
 	struct vop *vop = data;
 	uint32_t intr0_reg, active_irqs;
 	unsigned long flags;
+	int ret = IRQ_NONE;
 
 	/*
 	 * INTR_CTRL0 register has interrupt status, enable and clear bits, we
@@ -1104,15 +1144,24 @@  static irqreturn_t vop_isr(int irq, void *data)
 	if (!active_irqs)
 		return IRQ_NONE;
 
-	/* Only Frame Start Interrupt is enabled; other irqs are spurious. */
-	if (!(active_irqs & FS_INTR)) {
-		DRM_ERROR("Unknown VOP IRQs: %#02x\n", active_irqs);
-		return IRQ_NONE;
+	if (active_irqs & DSP_HOLD_VALID_INTR) {
+		if (!completion_done(&vop->dsp_hold_completion))
+			complete(&vop->dsp_hold_completion);
+		active_irqs &= ~DSP_HOLD_VALID_INTR;
+		ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
 	}
 
-	drm_handle_vblank(vop->drm_dev, vop->pipe);
+	if (active_irqs & FS_INTR) {
+		drm_handle_vblank(vop->drm_dev, vop->pipe);
+		active_irqs &= ~FS_INTR;
+		ret = (vop->vsync_work_pending) ? IRQ_WAKE_THREAD : IRQ_HANDLED;
+	}
 
-	return (vop->vsync_work_pending) ? IRQ_WAKE_THREAD : IRQ_HANDLED;
+	/* Unhandled irqs are spurious. */
+	if (active_irqs)
+		DRM_ERROR("Unknown VOP IRQs: %#02x\n", active_irqs);
+
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static int vop_create_crtc(struct vop *vop)
@@ -1194,6 +1243,7 @@  static int vop_create_crtc(struct vop *vop)
 		goto err_cleanup_crtc;
 	}
 
+	init_completion(&vop->dsp_hold_completion);
 	crtc->port = port;
 	vop->pipe = drm_crtc_index(crtc);
 	rockchip_register_crtc_funcs(drm_dev, &private_crtc_funcs, vop->pipe);