diff mbox

[3/7] btrfs: qgroup: Fix dead judgement on qgroup_rescan_leaf() return value.

Message ID 1425025468-29749-4-git-send-email-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Headers show

Commit Message

Qu Wenruo Feb. 27, 2015, 8:24 a.m. UTC
Old qgroup_rescan_leaf() comment indicates ret == 2 as complete and
cleared INCONSISTENT flag.

This is not true since it will never return 2, and inside it no codes
will clear INCONSISTENT flag.
The flag clearance is done in btrfs_qgroup_rescan_work().
This caused the bug that INCONSISTENT flag is never cleared.

So change the comment and fix the dead judgment.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/qgroup.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Josef Bacik March 2, 2015, 9:52 p.m. UTC | #1
On 02/27/2015 03:24 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Old qgroup_rescan_leaf() comment indicates ret == 2 as complete and
> cleared INCONSISTENT flag.
>
> This is not true since it will never return 2, and inside it no codes
> will clear INCONSISTENT flag.
> The flag clearance is done in btrfs_qgroup_rescan_work().
> This caused the bug that INCONSISTENT flag is never cleared.
>
> So change the comment and fix the dead judgment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

Thanks,

Josef
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
index 523e5b2..a48a590 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
@@ -2518,7 +2518,7 @@  void assert_qgroups_uptodate(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
 
 /*
  * returns < 0 on error, 0 when more leafs are to be scanned.
- * returns 1 when done, 2 when done and FLAG_INCONSISTENT was cleared.
+ * returns 1 when done.
  */
 static int
 qgroup_rescan_leaf(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct btrfs_path *path,
@@ -2665,7 +2665,7 @@  out:
 	mutex_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock);
 	fs_info->qgroup_flags &= ~BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN;
 
-	if (err == 2 &&
+	if (err > 0 &&
 	    fs_info->qgroup_flags & BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_INCONSISTENT) {
 		fs_info->qgroup_flags &= ~BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_INCONSISTENT;
 	} else if (err < 0) {
@@ -2675,7 +2675,7 @@  out:
 
 	if (err >= 0) {
 		btrfs_info(fs_info, "qgroup scan completed%s",
-			err == 2 ? " (inconsistency flag cleared)" : "");
+			err > 0 ? " (inconsistency flag cleared)" : "");
 	} else {
 		btrfs_err(fs_info, "qgroup scan failed with %d", err);
 	}