===================================================================
@@ -441,9 +441,9 @@
static void vcpu_pause(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- wait_queue_head_t *wq = kvm_arch_vcpu_wq(vcpu);
+ struct swait_head *wq = kvm_arch_vcpu_wq(vcpu);
- wait_event_interruptible(*wq, !vcpu->arch.pause);
+ swait_event_interruptible(*wq, !vcpu->arch.pause);
}
static int kvm_vcpu_initialized(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
===================================================================
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@
{
struct kvm *kvm = source_vcpu->kvm;
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = NULL, *tmp;
- wait_queue_head_t *wq;
+ struct swait_head *wq;
unsigned long cpu_id;
unsigned long context_id;
unsigned long mpidr;
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@
smp_mb(); /* Make sure the above is visible */
wq = kvm_arch_vcpu_wq(vcpu);
- wake_up_interruptible(wq);
+ swait_wake_interruptible(wq);
return PSCI_RET_SUCCESS;
}
===================================================================
@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@
u8 in_guest;
struct list_head runnable_threads;
spinlock_t lock;
- wait_queue_head_t wq;
+ struct swait_head wq;
u64 stolen_tb;
u64 preempt_tb;
struct kvm_vcpu *runner;
@@ -618,7 +618,7 @@
u8 prodded;
u32 last_inst;
- wait_queue_head_t *wqp;
+ struct swait_head *wqp;
struct kvmppc_vcore *vcore;
int ret;
int trap;
===================================================================
@@ -84,11 +84,11 @@
{
int me;
int cpu = vcpu->cpu;
- wait_queue_head_t *wqp;
+ struct swait_head *wqp;
wqp = kvm_arch_vcpu_wq(vcpu);
- if (waitqueue_active(wqp)) {
- wake_up_interruptible(wqp);
+ if (swaitqueue_active(wqp)) {
+ swait_wake_interruptible(wqp);
++vcpu->stat.halt_wakeup;
}
@@ -639,8 +639,8 @@
tvcpu->arch.prodded = 1;
smp_mb();
if (vcpu->arch.ceded) {
- if (waitqueue_active(&vcpu->wq)) {
- wake_up_interruptible(&vcpu->wq);
+ if (swaitqueue_active(&vcpu->wq)) {
+ swait_wake_interruptible(&vcpu->wq);
vcpu->stat.halt_wakeup++;
}
}
@@ -1357,7 +1357,7 @@
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vcore->runnable_threads);
spin_lock_init(&vcore->lock);
- init_waitqueue_head(&vcore->wq);
+ init_swait_head(&vcore->wq);
vcore->preempt_tb = TB_NIL;
vcore->lpcr = kvm->arch.lpcr;
vcore->first_vcpuid = core * threads_per_subcore;
@@ -1826,13 +1826,13 @@
*/
static void kvmppc_vcore_blocked(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc)
{
- DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
+ DEFINE_SWAITER(wait);
- prepare_to_wait(&vc->wq, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+ swait_prepare(&vc->wq, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
vc->vcore_state = VCORE_SLEEPING;
spin_unlock(&vc->lock);
schedule();
- finish_wait(&vc->wq, &wait);
+ swait_finish(&vc->wq, &wait);
spin_lock(&vc->lock);
vc->vcore_state = VCORE_INACTIVE;
}
@@ -1873,7 +1873,7 @@
kvmppc_create_dtl_entry(vcpu, vc);
kvmppc_start_thread(vcpu);
} else if (vc->vcore_state == VCORE_SLEEPING) {
- wake_up(&vc->wq);
+ swait_wake(&vc->wq);
}
}
===================================================================
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@
struct list_head list;
atomic_t active;
struct kvm_s390_float_interrupt *float_int;
- wait_queue_head_t *wq;
+ struct swait_head *wq;
atomic_t *cpuflags;
unsigned int action_bits;
};
===================================================================
@@ -619,13 +619,13 @@
void kvm_s390_vcpu_wakeup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- if (waitqueue_active(&vcpu->wq)) {
+ if (swaitqueue_active(&vcpu->wq)) {
/*
* The vcpu gave up the cpu voluntarily, mark it as a good
* yield-candidate.
*/
vcpu->preempted = true;
- wake_up_interruptible(&vcpu->wq);
+ swait_wake_interruptible(&vcpu->wq);
vcpu->stat.halt_wakeup++;
}
}
@@ -736,7 +736,7 @@
spin_lock(&li->lock);
list_add(&inti->list, &li->list);
atomic_set(&li->active, 1);
- BUG_ON(waitqueue_active(li->wq));
+ BUG_ON(swaitqueue_active(li->wq));
spin_unlock(&li->lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -761,7 +761,7 @@
spin_lock(&li->lock);
list_add(&inti->list, &li->list);
atomic_set(&li->active, 1);
- BUG_ON(waitqueue_active(li->wq));
+ BUG_ON(swaitqueue_active(li->wq));
spin_unlock(&li->lock);
return 0;
}
===================================================================
@@ -1539,7 +1539,7 @@
struct kvm_timer *ktimer = container_of(data, struct kvm_timer, timer);
struct kvm_lapic *apic = container_of(ktimer, struct kvm_lapic, lapic_timer);
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = apic->vcpu;
- wait_queue_head_t *q = &vcpu->wq;
+ struct swait_head *q = &vcpu->wq;
/*
* There is a race window between reading and incrementing, but we do
@@ -1553,8 +1553,8 @@
kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_PENDING_TIMER, vcpu);
}
- if (waitqueue_active(q))
- wake_up_interruptible(q);
+ if (swaitqueue_active(q))
+ swait_wake_interruptible(q);
if (lapic_is_periodic(apic)) {
hrtimer_add_expires_ns(&ktimer->timer, ktimer->period);
===================================================================
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@
int fpu_active;
int guest_fpu_loaded, guest_xcr0_loaded;
- wait_queue_head_t wq;
+ struct swait_head wq;
struct pid *pid;
int sigset_active;
sigset_t sigset;
@@ -687,7 +687,7 @@
}
#endif
-static inline wait_queue_head_t *kvm_arch_vcpu_wq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static inline struct swait_head *kvm_arch_vcpu_wq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
#ifdef __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_WQP
return vcpu->arch.wqp;
===================================================================
@@ -94,8 +94,8 @@
trace_kvm_async_pf_completed(addr, gva);
- if (waitqueue_active(&vcpu->wq))
- wake_up_interruptible(&vcpu->wq);
+ if (swaitqueue_active(&vcpu->wq))
+ swait_wake_interruptible(&vcpu->wq);
mmput(mm);
kvm_put_kvm(vcpu->kvm);
===================================================================
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@
vcpu->kvm = kvm;
vcpu->vcpu_id = id;
vcpu->pid = NULL;
- init_waitqueue_head(&vcpu->wq);
+ init_swait_head(&vcpu->wq);
kvm_async_pf_vcpu_init(vcpu);
page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
@@ -1740,10 +1740,10 @@
*/
void kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
+ DEFINE_SWAITER(wait);
for (;;) {
- prepare_to_wait(&vcpu->wq, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+ swait_prepare(&vcpu->wq, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
if (kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(vcpu)) {
kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_UNHALT, vcpu);
@@ -1757,7 +1757,7 @@
schedule();
}
- finish_wait(&vcpu->wq, &wait);
+ swait_finish(&vcpu->wq, &wait);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_vcpu_block);
@@ -1769,11 +1769,11 @@
{
int me;
int cpu = vcpu->cpu;
- wait_queue_head_t *wqp;
+ struct swait_head *wqp;
wqp = kvm_arch_vcpu_wq(vcpu);
- if (waitqueue_active(wqp)) {
- wake_up_interruptible(wqp);
+ if (swaitqueue_active(wqp)) {
+ swait_wake_interruptible(wqp);
++vcpu->stat.halt_wakeup;
}
@@ -1878,7 +1878,7 @@
continue;
if (vcpu == me)
continue;
- if (waitqueue_active(&vcpu->wq) && !kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(vcpu))
+ if (swaitqueue_active(&vcpu->wq) && !kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(vcpu))
continue;
if (!kvm_vcpu_eligible_for_directed_yield(vcpu))
continue;
The problem: On -RT, an emulated LAPIC timer instances has the following path: 1) hard interrupt 2) ksoftirqd is scheduled 3) ksoftirqd wakes up vcpu thread 4) vcpu thread is scheduled This extra context switch introduces unnecessary latency in the LAPIC path for a KVM guest. The solution: Allow waking up vcpu thread from hardirq context, thus avoiding the need for ksoftirqd to be scheduled. Normal waitqueues make use of spinlocks, which on -RT are sleepable locks. Therefore, waking up a waitqueue waiter involves locking a sleeping lock, which is not allowed from hard interrupt context. cyclictest command line: # cyclictest -m -n -q -p99 -l 1000000 -h60 -D 1m This patch reduces the average latency in my tests from 14us to 11us. Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> --- arch/arm/kvm/arm.c | 4 ++-- arch/arm/kvm/psci.c | 4 ++-- arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 ++-- arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +- arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c | 8 ++++---- arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 6 +++--- include/linux/kvm_host.h | 4 ++-- virt/kvm/async_pf.c | 4 ++-- virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 10 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html