diff mbox

[V4,4/6] device property: Introduces device_dma_is_coherent()

Message ID 1431724994-21601-5-git-send-email-Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable
Headers show

Commit Message

Suthikulpanit, Suravee May 15, 2015, 9:23 p.m. UTC
Currently, device drivers, which support both OF and ACPI,
need to call two separate APIs, of_dma_is_coherent() and
acpi_dma_is_coherent()) to determine device coherency attribute.

This patch simplifies this process by introducing a new device
property API, device_dma_is_coherent(), which calls the appropriate
interface based on the booting architecture.

Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
CC: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
---
 drivers/base/property.c  | 12 ++++++++++++
 include/linux/property.h |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)

Comments

Will Deacon May 20, 2015, 10:28 a.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:23:12PM +0100, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> Currently, device drivers, which support both OF and ACPI,
> need to call two separate APIs, of_dma_is_coherent() and
> acpi_dma_is_coherent()) to determine device coherency attribute.
> 
> This patch simplifies this process by introducing a new device
> property API, device_dma_is_coherent(), which calls the appropriate
> interface based on the booting architecture.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
> CC: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> ---
>  drivers/base/property.c  | 12 ++++++++++++
>  include/linux/property.h |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/property.c b/drivers/base/property.c
> index 1d0b116..8123c6e 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/property.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/property.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>  #include <linux/export.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>  #include <linux/property.h>
>  
>  /**
> @@ -519,3 +520,14 @@ unsigned int device_get_child_node_count(struct device *dev)
>  	return count;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_get_child_node_count);
> +
> +bool device_dma_is_coherent(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dev->of_node)
> +		return of_dma_is_coherent(dev->of_node);
> +	else if (has_acpi_companion(dev))
> +		return acpi_dma_is_coherent(acpi_node(dev->fwnode));

I don't think you need the has_acpi_companion check, as acpi_node handles
this and acpi_dma_is_coherent(NULL) returns false.

Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Suthikulpanit, Suravee May 20, 2015, 9:32 p.m. UTC | #2
On 5/20/2015 5:28 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:23:12PM +0100, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
>> Currently, device drivers, which support both OF and ACPI,
>> need to call two separate APIs, of_dma_is_coherent() and
>> acpi_dma_is_coherent()) to determine device coherency attribute.
>>
>> This patch simplifies this process by introducing a new device
>> property API, device_dma_is_coherent(), which calls the appropriate
>> interface based on the booting architecture.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
>> CC: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
>> ---
>>   drivers/base/property.c  | 12 ++++++++++++
>>   include/linux/property.h |  2 ++
>>   2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/property.c b/drivers/base/property.c
>> index 1d0b116..8123c6e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/property.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/property.c
>> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/export.h>
>>   #include <linux/kernel.h>
>>   #include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>>   #include <linux/property.h>
>>
>>   /**
>> @@ -519,3 +520,14 @@ unsigned int device_get_child_node_count(struct device *dev)
>>   	return count;
>>   }
>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_get_child_node_count);
>> +
>> +bool device_dma_is_coherent(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dev->of_node)
>> +		return of_dma_is_coherent(dev->of_node);
>> +	else if (has_acpi_companion(dev))
>> +		return acpi_dma_is_coherent(acpi_node(dev->fwnode));
>
> I don't think you need the has_acpi_companion check, as acpi_node handles
> this and acpi_dma_is_coherent(NULL) returns false.
>
> Will
>
You are right.

Thanks,

Suravee

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/base/property.c b/drivers/base/property.c
index 1d0b116..8123c6e 100644
--- a/drivers/base/property.c
+++ b/drivers/base/property.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/export.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
 #include <linux/property.h>
 
 /**
@@ -519,3 +520,14 @@  unsigned int device_get_child_node_count(struct device *dev)
 	return count;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_get_child_node_count);
+
+bool device_dma_is_coherent(struct device *dev)
+{
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dev->of_node)
+		return of_dma_is_coherent(dev->of_node);
+	else if (has_acpi_companion(dev))
+		return acpi_dma_is_coherent(acpi_node(dev->fwnode));
+
+	return false;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_dma_is_coherent);
diff --git a/include/linux/property.h b/include/linux/property.h
index de8bdf4..76ebde9 100644
--- a/include/linux/property.h
+++ b/include/linux/property.h
@@ -164,4 +164,6 @@  struct property_set {
 
 void device_add_property_set(struct device *dev, struct property_set *pset);
 
+bool device_dma_is_coherent(struct device *dev);
+
 #endif /* _LINUX_PROPERTY_H_ */