@@ -1699,6 +1699,34 @@ static void gen8_set_seqno(struct intel_engine_cs *ring, u32 seqno)
intel_write_status_page(ring, I915_GEM_HWS_INDEX, seqno);
}
+static u32 bxt_a_get_seqno(struct intel_engine_cs *ring, bool lazy_coherency)
+{
+
+ /*
+ * On BXT A steppings there is a HW coherency issue whereby the
+ * MI_STORE_DATA_IMM storing the completed request's seqno
+ * occasionally doesn't invalidate the CPU cache. Work around this by
+ * clflushing the corresponding cacheline whenever the caller wants
+ * the coherency to be guaranteed. Note that this cacheline is known
+ * to be clean at this point, since we only write it in
+ * bxt_a_set_seqno(), where we also do a clflush after the write. So
+ * this clflush in practice becomes an invalidate operation.
+ */
+
+ if (!lazy_coherency)
+ intel_flush_status_page(ring, I915_GEM_HWS_INDEX);
+
+ return intel_read_status_page(ring, I915_GEM_HWS_INDEX);
+}
+
+static void bxt_a_set_seqno(struct intel_engine_cs *ring, u32 seqno)
+{
+ intel_write_status_page(ring, I915_GEM_HWS_INDEX, seqno);
+
+ /* See bxt_a_get_seqno() explaining the reason for the clflush. */
+ intel_flush_status_page(ring, I915_GEM_HWS_INDEX);
+}
+
static int gen8_emit_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
{
struct intel_ringbuffer *ringbuf = request->ringbuf;
@@ -1868,8 +1896,13 @@ static int logical_render_ring_init(struct drm_device *dev)
ring->init_hw = gen8_init_render_ring;
ring->init_context = gen8_init_rcs_context;
ring->cleanup = intel_fini_pipe_control;
- ring->get_seqno = gen8_get_seqno;
- ring->set_seqno = gen8_set_seqno;
+ if (IS_BROXTON(dev) && INTEL_REVID(dev) < BXT_REVID_B0) {
+ ring->get_seqno = bxt_a_get_seqno;
+ ring->set_seqno = bxt_a_set_seqno;
+ } else {
+ ring->get_seqno = gen8_get_seqno;
+ ring->set_seqno = gen8_set_seqno;
+ }
ring->emit_request = gen8_emit_request;
ring->emit_flush = gen8_emit_flush_render;
ring->irq_get = gen8_logical_ring_get_irq;
@@ -1915,8 +1948,13 @@ static int logical_bsd_ring_init(struct drm_device *dev)
GT_CONTEXT_SWITCH_INTERRUPT << GEN8_VCS1_IRQ_SHIFT;
ring->init_hw = gen8_init_common_ring;
- ring->get_seqno = gen8_get_seqno;
- ring->set_seqno = gen8_set_seqno;
+ if (IS_BROXTON(dev) && INTEL_REVID(dev) < BXT_REVID_B0) {
+ ring->get_seqno = bxt_a_get_seqno;
+ ring->set_seqno = bxt_a_set_seqno;
+ } else {
+ ring->get_seqno = gen8_get_seqno;
+ ring->set_seqno = gen8_set_seqno;
+ }
ring->emit_request = gen8_emit_request;
ring->emit_flush = gen8_emit_flush;
ring->irq_get = gen8_logical_ring_get_irq;
@@ -1965,8 +2003,13 @@ static int logical_blt_ring_init(struct drm_device *dev)
GT_CONTEXT_SWITCH_INTERRUPT << GEN8_BCS_IRQ_SHIFT;
ring->init_hw = gen8_init_common_ring;
- ring->get_seqno = gen8_get_seqno;
- ring->set_seqno = gen8_set_seqno;
+ if (IS_BROXTON(dev) && INTEL_REVID(dev) < BXT_REVID_B0) {
+ ring->get_seqno = bxt_a_get_seqno;
+ ring->set_seqno = bxt_a_set_seqno;
+ } else {
+ ring->get_seqno = gen8_get_seqno;
+ ring->set_seqno = gen8_set_seqno;
+ }
ring->emit_request = gen8_emit_request;
ring->emit_flush = gen8_emit_flush;
ring->irq_get = gen8_logical_ring_get_irq;
@@ -1990,8 +2033,13 @@ static int logical_vebox_ring_init(struct drm_device *dev)
GT_CONTEXT_SWITCH_INTERRUPT << GEN8_VECS_IRQ_SHIFT;
ring->init_hw = gen8_init_common_ring;
- ring->get_seqno = gen8_get_seqno;
- ring->set_seqno = gen8_set_seqno;
+ if (IS_BROXTON(dev) && INTEL_REVID(dev) < BXT_REVID_B0) {
+ ring->get_seqno = bxt_a_get_seqno;
+ ring->set_seqno = bxt_a_set_seqno;
+ } else {
+ ring->get_seqno = gen8_get_seqno;
+ ring->set_seqno = gen8_set_seqno;
+ }
ring->emit_request = gen8_emit_request;
ring->emit_flush = gen8_emit_flush;
ring->irq_get = gen8_logical_ring_get_irq;
@@ -377,6 +377,13 @@ intel_ring_sync_index(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
return idx;
}
+static inline void
+intel_flush_status_page(struct intel_engine_cs *ring, int reg)
+{
+ drm_clflush_virt_range(&ring->status_page.page_addr[reg],
+ sizeof(uint32_t));
+}
+
static inline u32
intel_read_status_page(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
int reg)
By running igt/store_dword_loop_render on BXT we can hit a coherency problem where the seqno written at GPU command completion time is not seen by the CPU. This results in __i915_wait_request seeing the stale seqno and not completing the request (not considering the lost interrupt/GPU reset mechanism). I also verified that this isn't a case of a lost interrupt, or that the command didn't complete somehow: when the coherency issue occured I read the seqno via an uncached GTT mapping too. While the cached version of the seqno still showed the stale value the one read via the uncached mapping was the correct one. Work around this issue by clflushing the corresponding CPU cacheline following any store of the seqno and preceding any reading of it. When reading it do this only when the caller expects a coherent view. v2: - fix using the proper logical && instead of a bitwise & (Jani, Mika) - limit the workaround to A stepping, on later steppings this HW issue is fixed v3: - use a separate get_seqno/set_seqno vfunc (Chris) Testcase: igt/store_dword_loop_render Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 7 ++++ 2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)