[05/17] fs/exofs: remove unnecessary new_valid_dev check
diff mbox

Message ID 1443447836-5178-1-git-send-email-bywxiaobai@163.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Yaowei Bai Sept. 28, 2015, 1:43 p.m. UTC
As new_valid_dev always returns 1, so !new_valid_dev check is not
needed, remove it.

Signed-off-by: Yaowei Bai <bywxiaobai@163.com>
---
 fs/exofs/namei.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Boaz Harrosh Sept. 29, 2015, 1:47 p.m. UTC | #1
On 09/28/2015 04:43 PM, Yaowei Bai wrote:
> As new_valid_dev always returns 1, so !new_valid_dev check is not
> needed, remove it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yaowei Bai <bywxiaobai@163.com>

ACK-by: Boaz Harrosh <ooo@electrozaur.com>

Please submit this through some General tree like the vfs or mm-tree

Thanks
Boaz

> ---
>  fs/exofs/namei.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/exofs/namei.c b/fs/exofs/namei.c
> index 09a6bb1..994e078 100644
> --- a/fs/exofs/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/exofs/namei.c
> @@ -80,9 +80,6 @@ static int exofs_mknod(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t mode,
>  	struct inode *inode;
>  	int err;
>  
> -	if (!new_valid_dev(rdev))
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
>  	inode = exofs_new_inode(dir, mode);
>  	err = PTR_ERR(inode);
>  	if (!IS_ERR(inode)) {
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Yaowei Bai Sept. 29, 2015, 3:46 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 04:47:30PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On 09/28/2015 04:43 PM, Yaowei Bai wrote:
> > As new_valid_dev always returns 1, so !new_valid_dev check is not
> > needed, remove it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Yaowei Bai <bywxiaobai@163.com>
> 
> ACK-by: Boaz Harrosh <ooo@electrozaur.com>

Thanks.

> 
> Please submit this through some General tree like the vfs or mm-tree

This's my first fs-specific patch, so i think you mean i should cc vfs
or mm-tree?

> 
> Thanks
> Boaz
> 
> > ---
> >  fs/exofs/namei.c | 3 ---
> >  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/exofs/namei.c b/fs/exofs/namei.c
> > index 09a6bb1..994e078 100644
> > --- a/fs/exofs/namei.c
> > +++ b/fs/exofs/namei.c
> > @@ -80,9 +80,6 @@ static int exofs_mknod(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t mode,
> >  	struct inode *inode;
> >  	int err;
> >  
> > -	if (!new_valid_dev(rdev))
> > -		return -EINVAL;
> > -
> >  	inode = exofs_new_inode(dir, mode);
> >  	err = PTR_ERR(inode);
> >  	if (!IS_ERR(inode)) {
> > 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Boaz Harrosh Sept. 30, 2015, 10:26 a.m. UTC | #3
On 09/29/2015 06:46 PM, Yaowei Bai wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 04:47:30PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> On 09/28/2015 04:43 PM, Yaowei Bai wrote:
>>> As new_valid_dev always returns 1, so !new_valid_dev check is not
>>> needed, remove it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yaowei Bai <bywxiaobai@163.com>
>>
>> ACK-by: Boaz Harrosh <ooo@electrozaur.com>
> 
> Thanks.
> 
>>
>> Please submit this through some General tree like the vfs or mm-tree
> 
> This's my first fs-specific patch, so i think you mean i should cc vfs
> or mm-tree?
> 

Yes you should ask Al (or Morton) to take the all patchset through their
tree. Then once all users of new_valid_dev() are gone it can be removed
in the one tree.

Thanks
Boaz

>>
>> Thanks
>> Boaz
>>
>>> ---
>>>  fs/exofs/namei.c | 3 ---
>>>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/exofs/namei.c b/fs/exofs/namei.c
>>> index 09a6bb1..994e078 100644
>>> --- a/fs/exofs/namei.c
>>> +++ b/fs/exofs/namei.c
>>> @@ -80,9 +80,6 @@ static int exofs_mknod(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t mode,
>>>  	struct inode *inode;
>>>  	int err;
>>>  
>>> -	if (!new_valid_dev(rdev))
>>> -		return -EINVAL;
>>> -
>>>  	inode = exofs_new_inode(dir, mode);
>>>  	err = PTR_ERR(inode);
>>>  	if (!IS_ERR(inode)) {
>>>
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Yaowei Bai Oct. 8, 2015, 12:29 p.m. UTC | #4
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 04:47:30PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On 09/28/2015 04:43 PM, Yaowei Bai wrote:
> > As new_valid_dev always returns 1, so !new_valid_dev check is not
> > needed, remove it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Yaowei Bai <bywxiaobai@163.com>
> 
> ACK-by: Boaz Harrosh <ooo@electrozaur.com>
> 
> Please submit this through some General tree like the vfs or mm-tree

Sorry for delay reply. There's something wrong with my mailbox and
i lost your last recent reply. And i just want to say i will follow
your advice to send this patchset to Morton and once he takes it i'll
send another patch to remove new_valid_dev() at all. Thanks.

Thanks
Bai

> 
> Thanks
> Boaz
> 
> > ---
> >  fs/exofs/namei.c | 3 ---
> >  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/exofs/namei.c b/fs/exofs/namei.c
> > index 09a6bb1..994e078 100644
> > --- a/fs/exofs/namei.c
> > +++ b/fs/exofs/namei.c
> > @@ -80,9 +80,6 @@ static int exofs_mknod(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t mode,
> >  	struct inode *inode;
> >  	int err;
> >  
> > -	if (!new_valid_dev(rdev))
> > -		return -EINVAL;
> > -
> >  	inode = exofs_new_inode(dir, mode);
> >  	err = PTR_ERR(inode);
> >  	if (!IS_ERR(inode)) {
> > 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Patch
diff mbox

diff --git a/fs/exofs/namei.c b/fs/exofs/namei.c
index 09a6bb1..994e078 100644
--- a/fs/exofs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/exofs/namei.c
@@ -80,9 +80,6 @@  static int exofs_mknod(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t mode,
 	struct inode *inode;
 	int err;
 
-	if (!new_valid_dev(rdev))
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	inode = exofs_new_inode(dir, mode);
 	err = PTR_ERR(inode);
 	if (!IS_ERR(inode)) {