| Message ID | 1444715655-30077-1-git-send-email-hs@denx.de (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
* Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> [151012 22:58]: > Of this, secure content (including PPA) uses initial > portion of the SRAM. This chunk is not (and shouldn't > be) accessible from the public code. > > The minimum size of this chunk (0x350) is used in this > patch. Available size is rounded off to 63K. > > Both values would require a change if size of secure > content grows beyond 0x350. Makes sense to me. And something similar is needed at least for dm814x to get rid of the imprecise abort during boot with commit bbeb92095159 ("ARM: 8422/1: enable imprecise aborts during early kernel startup") applied. Is this needed as a fix to the -rc cycle, or can this wait for v4.4? Regards, Tony > Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> > Signed-off-by: Ayoub Zaki <Ayoub.Zaki@bosch-si.com> > --- > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram.c > index cd488b8..2e7c00f 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram.c > @@ -47,6 +47,28 @@ > > #define GP_DEVICE 0x300 > > +/** > + * Size of chunk used by secure content in the HS/EMU devices. > + * > + * This size is not fixed. It depends upon the implementation of PPA. > + * May need to be modified if the size grows. > + */ > +#define AM33XX_HS_HEADER_SIZE 0x0350 > + > +/** > + * Start of public SRAM on HS/EMU devices. > + */ > +#define AM33XX_SRAM_PA 0x40300000 > +#define AM33XX_SRAM_PUB_PA (AM33XX_SRAM_PA + AM33XX_HS_HEADER_SIZE) > + > +/** > + * Size of public SRAM available on HS/EMU devices. > + * > + * This size also depends upon AM33XX_HS_HEADER_SIZE. > + * Current value is derived from nearest round-off. > + */ > +#define AM33XX_SRAM_PUB_SIZE 0xfc00 /* 63K */ > + > #define ROUND_DOWN(value,boundary) ((value) & (~((boundary)-1))) > > static unsigned long omap_sram_start; > @@ -99,6 +121,9 @@ static void __init omap_detect_sram(void) > } else { > omap_sram_size = 0x8000; /* 32K */ > } > + } else if (soc_is_am33xx()) { > + omap_sram_start = AM33XX_SRAM_PUB_PA; > + omap_sram_size = AM33XX_SRAM_PUB_SIZE; > } else { > omap_sram_start = OMAP2_SRAM_PUB_PA; > omap_sram_size = 0x800; /* 2K */ > -- > 2.1.0 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [151014 10:56]: > * Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> [151012 22:58]: > > Of this, secure content (including PPA) uses initial > > portion of the SRAM. This chunk is not (and shouldn't > > be) accessible from the public code. > > > > The minimum size of this chunk (0x350) is used in this > > patch. Available size is rounded off to 63K. > > > > Both values would require a change if size of secure > > content grows beyond 0x350. > > Makes sense to me. And something similar is needed at least for > dm814x to get rid of the imprecise abort during boot with > commit bbeb92095159 ("ARM: 8422/1: enable imprecise aborts during > early kernel startup") applied. > > Is this needed as a fix to the -rc cycle, or can this wait for > v4.4? Actually I think we may have a regression somwhere. If you look at commit 8b9a2810b02e ("ARM: OMAP4+: Move SRAM data to DT") this should all be handled by drivers/misc/sram.c nowadays. So for most SoCs, we should completely skip the plat-omap/sram.c code. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hello Tony, Am 14.10.2015 um 19:49 schrieb Tony Lindgren: > * Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> [151012 22:58]: >> Of this, secure content (including PPA) uses initial >> portion of the SRAM. This chunk is not (and shouldn't >> be) accessible from the public code. >> >> The minimum size of this chunk (0x350) is used in this >> patch. Available size is rounded off to 63K. >> >> Both values would require a change if size of secure >> content grows beyond 0x350. > > Makes sense to me. And something similar is needed at least for > dm814x to get rid of the imprecise abort during boot with > commit bbeb92095159 ("ARM: 8422/1: enable imprecise aborts during > early kernel startup") applied. > > Is this needed as a fix to the -rc cycle, or can this wait for > v4.4? I need it for an upcoming boards support, so 4.4 is fine for me, thanks! bye, Heiko > > Regards, > > Tony > > >> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> >> Signed-off-by: Ayoub Zaki <Ayoub.Zaki@bosch-si.com> >> --- >> >> arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram.c >> index cd488b8..2e7c00f 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram.c >> @@ -47,6 +47,28 @@ >> >> #define GP_DEVICE 0x300 >> >> +/** >> + * Size of chunk used by secure content in the HS/EMU devices. >> + * >> + * This size is not fixed. It depends upon the implementation of PPA. >> + * May need to be modified if the size grows. >> + */ >> +#define AM33XX_HS_HEADER_SIZE 0x0350 >> + >> +/** >> + * Start of public SRAM on HS/EMU devices. >> + */ >> +#define AM33XX_SRAM_PA 0x40300000 >> +#define AM33XX_SRAM_PUB_PA (AM33XX_SRAM_PA + AM33XX_HS_HEADER_SIZE) >> + >> +/** >> + * Size of public SRAM available on HS/EMU devices. >> + * >> + * This size also depends upon AM33XX_HS_HEADER_SIZE. >> + * Current value is derived from nearest round-off. >> + */ >> +#define AM33XX_SRAM_PUB_SIZE 0xfc00 /* 63K */ >> + >> #define ROUND_DOWN(value,boundary) ((value) & (~((boundary)-1))) >> >> static unsigned long omap_sram_start; >> @@ -99,6 +121,9 @@ static void __init omap_detect_sram(void) >> } else { >> omap_sram_size = 0x8000; /* 32K */ >> } >> + } else if (soc_is_am33xx()) { >> + omap_sram_start = AM33XX_SRAM_PUB_PA; >> + omap_sram_size = AM33XX_SRAM_PUB_SIZE; >> } else { >> omap_sram_start = OMAP2_SRAM_PUB_PA; >> omap_sram_size = 0x800; /* 2K */ >> -- >> 2.1.0 >> >
Hello Tony, Am 15.10.2015 um 00:20 schrieb Tony Lindgren: > * Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [151014 10:56]: >> * Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> [151012 22:58]: >>> Of this, secure content (including PPA) uses initial >>> portion of the SRAM. This chunk is not (and shouldn't >>> be) accessible from the public code. >>> >>> The minimum size of this chunk (0x350) is used in this >>> patch. Available size is rounded off to 63K. >>> >>> Both values would require a change if size of secure >>> content grows beyond 0x350. >> >> Makes sense to me. And something similar is needed at least for >> dm814x to get rid of the imprecise abort during boot with >> commit bbeb92095159 ("ARM: 8422/1: enable imprecise aborts during >> early kernel startup") applied. >> >> Is this needed as a fix to the -rc cycle, or can this wait for >> v4.4? > > Actually I think we may have a regression somwhere. If you look > at commit 8b9a2810b02e ("ARM: OMAP4+: Move SRAM data to DT") > this should all be handled by drivers/misc/sram.c nowadays. > > So for most SoCs, we should completely skip the plat-omap/sram.c > code. Yes, correct. So it should be enough for changing the DT, thanks. bye, Heiko
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram.c index cd488b8..2e7c00f 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram.c @@ -47,6 +47,28 @@ #define GP_DEVICE 0x300 +/** + * Size of chunk used by secure content in the HS/EMU devices. + * + * This size is not fixed. It depends upon the implementation of PPA. + * May need to be modified if the size grows. + */ +#define AM33XX_HS_HEADER_SIZE 0x0350 + +/** + * Start of public SRAM on HS/EMU devices. + */ +#define AM33XX_SRAM_PA 0x40300000 +#define AM33XX_SRAM_PUB_PA (AM33XX_SRAM_PA + AM33XX_HS_HEADER_SIZE) + +/** + * Size of public SRAM available on HS/EMU devices. + * + * This size also depends upon AM33XX_HS_HEADER_SIZE. + * Current value is derived from nearest round-off. + */ +#define AM33XX_SRAM_PUB_SIZE 0xfc00 /* 63K */ + #define ROUND_DOWN(value,boundary) ((value) & (~((boundary)-1))) static unsigned long omap_sram_start; @@ -99,6 +121,9 @@ static void __init omap_detect_sram(void) } else { omap_sram_size = 0x8000; /* 32K */ } + } else if (soc_is_am33xx()) { + omap_sram_start = AM33XX_SRAM_PUB_PA; + omap_sram_size = AM33XX_SRAM_PUB_SIZE; } else { omap_sram_start = OMAP2_SRAM_PUB_PA; omap_sram_size = 0x800; /* 2K */