diff mbox

[6/6,ALSA] portman2x4 - use new parport device model

Message ID 1452150951-1571-6-git-send-email-sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Sudip Mukherjee Jan. 7, 2016, 7:15 a.m. UTC
Modify portman driver to use the new parallel port device model.

Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
---
 sound/drivers/portman2x4.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Comments

Takashi Iwai Jan. 7, 2016, 10:26 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, 07 Jan 2016 08:15:51 +0100,
Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> 
> Modify portman driver to use the new parallel port device model.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>

Did you actually test this?

Also about the changes:

> ---
>  sound/drivers/portman2x4.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/drivers/portman2x4.c b/sound/drivers/portman2x4.c
> index 5fcde7d..88b25ca 100644
> --- a/sound/drivers/portman2x4.c
> +++ b/sound/drivers/portman2x4.c
> @@ -704,9 +704,10 @@ static void snd_portman_detach(struct parport *p)
>  }
>  
>  static struct parport_driver portman_parport_driver = {
> -	.name   = "portman2x4",
> -	.attach = snd_portman_attach,
> -	.detach = snd_portman_detach
> +	.name		= "portman2x4",
> +	.match_port	= snd_portman_attach,
> +	.detach		= snd_portman_detach,
> +	.devmodel	= true,
>  };
>  
>  /*********************************************************************
> @@ -734,6 +735,7 @@ static int snd_portman_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	struct snd_card *card = NULL;
>  	struct portman *pm = NULL;
>  	int err;
> +	struct pardev_cb portman_cb;
>  
>  	p = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
> @@ -758,13 +760,15 @@ static int snd_portman_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	sprintf(card->longname,  "%s at 0x%lx, irq %i",
>  		card->shortname, p->base, p->irq);
>  
> -	pardev = parport_register_device(p,                     /* port */
> -					 DRIVER_NAME,           /* name */
> -					 NULL,                  /* preempt */
> -					 NULL,                  /* wakeup */
> -					 snd_portman_interrupt, /* ISR */
> -					 PARPORT_DEV_EXCL,      /* flags */
> -					 (void *)card);         /* private */
> +	memset(&portman_cb, 0, sizeof(portman_cb));
> +	portman_cb.private = card;                      /* private */
> +	portman_cb.irq_func = snd_portman_interrupt;    /* ISR */
> +	portman_cb.flags = PARPORT_DEV_EXCL;            /* flags */

You can put them initializers except for private.  Then the explicit
memset can be omitted.

> +
> +	pardev = parport_register_dev_model(p,		   /* port */
> +					    DRIVER_NAME,   /* name */
> +					    &portman_cb,   /* callbacks */
> +					    device_count); /* device number */

Does device_count really work similarly for
parport_register_dev_model()?  I supposed the argument being the
device id number while you're passing the number of devices to
create.


Takashi


>  	if (!pardev) {
>  		snd_printd("Cannot register pardevice\n");
>  		err = -EIO;
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Alsa-devel mailing list
> Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
>
Sudip Mukherjee Jan. 7, 2016, 10:44 a.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 11:26:44AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Jan 2016 08:15:51 +0100,
> Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > 
> > Modify portman driver to use the new parallel port device model.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
> 
> Did you actually test this?

No. :(
I donot have the hardware. But since the only change is in the way it
registers with the parport so it should not break.
I was preparing v2 for this and the other one. I missed seeing some more
points.
> 
> Also about the changes:
> 
> > ---
> >  sound/drivers/portman2x4.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
> >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/sound/drivers/portman2x4.c b/sound/drivers/portman2x4.c
> > index 5fcde7d..88b25ca 100644
> > --- a/sound/drivers/portman2x4.c
> > +++ b/sound/drivers/portman2x4.c
> > @@ -704,9 +704,10 @@ static void snd_portman_detach(struct parport *p)
> >  }
> >  
> >  static struct parport_driver portman_parport_driver = {
> > -	.name   = "portman2x4",
> > -	.attach = snd_portman_attach,
> > -	.detach = snd_portman_detach
> > +	.name		= "portman2x4",
> > +	.match_port	= snd_portman_attach,
> > +	.detach		= snd_portman_detach,
> > +	.devmodel	= true,
> >  };
> >  
> >  /*********************************************************************
> > @@ -734,6 +735,7 @@ static int snd_portman_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	struct snd_card *card = NULL;
> >  	struct portman *pm = NULL;
> >  	int err;
> > +	struct pardev_cb portman_cb;
> >  
> >  	p = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
> > @@ -758,13 +760,15 @@ static int snd_portman_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	sprintf(card->longname,  "%s at 0x%lx, irq %i",
> >  		card->shortname, p->base, p->irq);
> >  
> > -	pardev = parport_register_device(p,                     /* port */
> > -					 DRIVER_NAME,           /* name */
> > -					 NULL,                  /* preempt */
> > -					 NULL,                  /* wakeup */
> > -					 snd_portman_interrupt, /* ISR */
> > -					 PARPORT_DEV_EXCL,      /* flags */
> > -					 (void *)card);         /* private */
> > +	memset(&portman_cb, 0, sizeof(portman_cb));
> > +	portman_cb.private = card;                      /* private */
> > +	portman_cb.irq_func = snd_portman_interrupt;    /* ISR */
> > +	portman_cb.flags = PARPORT_DEV_EXCL;            /* flags */
> 
> You can put them initializers except for private.  Then the explicit
> memset can be omitted.
> 
> > +
> > +	pardev = parport_register_dev_model(p,		   /* port */
> > +					    DRIVER_NAME,   /* name */
> > +					    &portman_cb,   /* callbacks */
> > +					    device_count); /* device number */
> 
> Does device_count really work similarly for
> parport_register_dev_model()?  I supposed the argument being the
> device id number while you're passing the number of devices to
> create.

This device_count is actually used for the device name in
/sys/bus/parport/devices. Something like DRIVER_NAME.device_count.

Regards
Sudip
Takashi Iwai Jan. 7, 2016, 10:50 a.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, 07 Jan 2016 11:44:34 +0100,
Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 11:26:44AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > On Thu, 07 Jan 2016 08:15:51 +0100,
> > Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > 
> > > Modify portman driver to use the new parallel port device model.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
> > 
> > Did you actually test this?
> 
> No. :(
> I donot have the hardware. But since the only change is in the way it
> registers with the parport so it should not break.
> I was preparing v2 for this and the other one. I missed seeing some more
> points.
> > 
> > Also about the changes:
> > 
> > > ---
> > >  sound/drivers/portman2x4.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
> > >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/sound/drivers/portman2x4.c b/sound/drivers/portman2x4.c
> > > index 5fcde7d..88b25ca 100644
> > > --- a/sound/drivers/portman2x4.c
> > > +++ b/sound/drivers/portman2x4.c
> > > @@ -704,9 +704,10 @@ static void snd_portman_detach(struct parport *p)
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  static struct parport_driver portman_parport_driver = {
> > > -	.name   = "portman2x4",
> > > -	.attach = snd_portman_attach,
> > > -	.detach = snd_portman_detach
> > > +	.name		= "portman2x4",
> > > +	.match_port	= snd_portman_attach,
> > > +	.detach		= snd_portman_detach,
> > > +	.devmodel	= true,
> > >  };
> > >  
> > >  /*********************************************************************
> > > @@ -734,6 +735,7 @@ static int snd_portman_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >  	struct snd_card *card = NULL;
> > >  	struct portman *pm = NULL;
> > >  	int err;
> > > +	struct pardev_cb portman_cb;
> > >  
> > >  	p = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > >  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
> > > @@ -758,13 +760,15 @@ static int snd_portman_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >  	sprintf(card->longname,  "%s at 0x%lx, irq %i",
> > >  		card->shortname, p->base, p->irq);
> > >  
> > > -	pardev = parport_register_device(p,                     /* port */
> > > -					 DRIVER_NAME,           /* name */
> > > -					 NULL,                  /* preempt */
> > > -					 NULL,                  /* wakeup */
> > > -					 snd_portman_interrupt, /* ISR */
> > > -					 PARPORT_DEV_EXCL,      /* flags */
> > > -					 (void *)card);         /* private */
> > > +	memset(&portman_cb, 0, sizeof(portman_cb));
> > > +	portman_cb.private = card;                      /* private */
> > > +	portman_cb.irq_func = snd_portman_interrupt;    /* ISR */
> > > +	portman_cb.flags = PARPORT_DEV_EXCL;            /* flags */
> > 
> > You can put them initializers except for private.  Then the explicit
> > memset can be omitted.
> > 
> > > +
> > > +	pardev = parport_register_dev_model(p,		   /* port */
> > > +					    DRIVER_NAME,   /* name */
> > > +					    &portman_cb,   /* callbacks */
> > > +					    device_count); /* device number */
> > 
> > Does device_count really work similarly for
> > parport_register_dev_model()?  I supposed the argument being the
> > device id number while you're passing the number of devices to
> > create.
> 
> This device_count is actually used for the device name in
> /sys/bus/parport/devices. Something like DRIVER_NAME.device_count.

Well, but device_count is incremented in snd_portman_attach().  The
management of device_count should be moved around the caller side, if
we use this as the id (and use the assigned id instead of device_count
in snd_portman_attach()).


Takashi
Sudip Mukherjee Jan. 7, 2016, 11:01 a.m. UTC | #4
On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 11:50:15AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Jan 2016 11:44:34 +0100,
> Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 11:26:44AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > On Thu, 07 Jan 2016 08:15:51 +0100,
> > > Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Modify portman driver to use the new parallel port device model.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
> > > 
> > > Did you actually test this?
> > 
> > No. :(
> > I donot have the hardware. But since the only change is in the way it
> > registers with the parport so it should not break.
> > I was preparing v2 for this and the other one. I missed seeing some more
> > points.
> > > 
> > > Also about the changes:
> > > 
> > > > ---
> > > >  sound/drivers/portman2x4.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
> > > >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/sound/drivers/portman2x4.c b/sound/drivers/portman2x4.c
> > > > index 5fcde7d..88b25ca 100644
> > > > --- a/sound/drivers/portman2x4.c
> > > > +++ b/sound/drivers/portman2x4.c
> > > > @@ -704,9 +704,10 @@ static void snd_portman_detach(struct parport *p)
> > > >  }
> > > >  
> > > >  static struct parport_driver portman_parport_driver = {
> > > > -	.name   = "portman2x4",
> > > > -	.attach = snd_portman_attach,
> > > > -	.detach = snd_portman_detach
> > > > +	.name		= "portman2x4",
> > > > +	.match_port	= snd_portman_attach,
> > > > +	.detach		= snd_portman_detach,
> > > > +	.devmodel	= true,
> > > >  };
> > > >  
> > > >  /*********************************************************************
> > > > @@ -734,6 +735,7 @@ static int snd_portman_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > >  	struct snd_card *card = NULL;
> > > >  	struct portman *pm = NULL;
> > > >  	int err;
> > > > +	struct pardev_cb portman_cb;
> > > >  
> > > >  	p = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > >  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
> > > > @@ -758,13 +760,15 @@ static int snd_portman_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > >  	sprintf(card->longname,  "%s at 0x%lx, irq %i",
> > > >  		card->shortname, p->base, p->irq);
> > > >  
> > > > -	pardev = parport_register_device(p,                     /* port */
> > > > -					 DRIVER_NAME,           /* name */
> > > > -					 NULL,                  /* preempt */
> > > > -					 NULL,                  /* wakeup */
> > > > -					 snd_portman_interrupt, /* ISR */
> > > > -					 PARPORT_DEV_EXCL,      /* flags */
> > > > -					 (void *)card);         /* private */
> > > > +	memset(&portman_cb, 0, sizeof(portman_cb));
> > > > +	portman_cb.private = card;                      /* private */
> > > > +	portman_cb.irq_func = snd_portman_interrupt;    /* ISR */
> > > > +	portman_cb.flags = PARPORT_DEV_EXCL;            /* flags */
> > > 
> > > You can put them initializers except for private.  Then the explicit
> > > memset can be omitted.
> > > 
> > > > +
> > > > +	pardev = parport_register_dev_model(p,		   /* port */
> > > > +					    DRIVER_NAME,   /* name */
> > > > +					    &portman_cb,   /* callbacks */
> > > > +					    device_count); /* device number */
> > > 
> > > Does device_count really work similarly for
> > > parport_register_dev_model()?  I supposed the argument being the
> > > device id number while you're passing the number of devices to
> > > create.
> > 
> > This device_count is actually used for the device name in
> > /sys/bus/parport/devices. Something like DRIVER_NAME.device_count.
> 
> Well, but device_count is incremented in snd_portman_attach().  The
> management of device_count should be moved around the caller side, if
> we use this as the id (and use the assigned id instead of device_count
> in snd_portman_attach()).

But, snd_portman_attach() finally decides if the probe/attach was a
success or not. And it will save the device in
platform_devices[device_count] and then it will increment device_count
to prepare it for the next device. Ofcourse, we can do it in
snd_portman_probe() but isn't snd_portman_attach() the caller here?

If you want I can move the count to snd_portman_probe() but since I do
not have the hardware I tried to have the minimum possible change.

regards
sudip
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/sound/drivers/portman2x4.c b/sound/drivers/portman2x4.c
index 5fcde7d..88b25ca 100644
--- a/sound/drivers/portman2x4.c
+++ b/sound/drivers/portman2x4.c
@@ -704,9 +704,10 @@  static void snd_portman_detach(struct parport *p)
 }
 
 static struct parport_driver portman_parport_driver = {
-	.name   = "portman2x4",
-	.attach = snd_portman_attach,
-	.detach = snd_portman_detach
+	.name		= "portman2x4",
+	.match_port	= snd_portman_attach,
+	.detach		= snd_portman_detach,
+	.devmodel	= true,
 };
 
 /*********************************************************************
@@ -734,6 +735,7 @@  static int snd_portman_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct snd_card *card = NULL;
 	struct portman *pm = NULL;
 	int err;
+	struct pardev_cb portman_cb;
 
 	p = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
@@ -758,13 +760,15 @@  static int snd_portman_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	sprintf(card->longname,  "%s at 0x%lx, irq %i",
 		card->shortname, p->base, p->irq);
 
-	pardev = parport_register_device(p,                     /* port */
-					 DRIVER_NAME,           /* name */
-					 NULL,                  /* preempt */
-					 NULL,                  /* wakeup */
-					 snd_portman_interrupt, /* ISR */
-					 PARPORT_DEV_EXCL,      /* flags */
-					 (void *)card);         /* private */
+	memset(&portman_cb, 0, sizeof(portman_cb));
+	portman_cb.private = card;                      /* private */
+	portman_cb.irq_func = snd_portman_interrupt;    /* ISR */
+	portman_cb.flags = PARPORT_DEV_EXCL;            /* flags */
+
+	pardev = parport_register_dev_model(p,		   /* port */
+					    DRIVER_NAME,   /* name */
+					    &portman_cb,   /* callbacks */
+					    device_count); /* device number */
 	if (!pardev) {
 		snd_printd("Cannot register pardevice\n");
 		err = -EIO;