@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
* anyone care?
*
* For virtio_pci on SMP, we don't need to order with respect to MMIO
- * accesses through relaxed memory I/O windows, so smp_mb() et al are
+ * accesses through relaxed memory I/O windows, so virt_mb() et al are
* sufficient.
*
* For using virtio to talk to real devices (eg. other heterogeneous
@@ -21,11 +21,10 @@
* actually quite cheap.
*/
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
static inline void virtio_mb(bool weak_barriers)
{
if (weak_barriers)
- smp_mb();
+ virt_mb();
else
mb();
}
@@ -33,7 +32,7 @@ static inline void virtio_mb(bool weak_barriers)
static inline void virtio_rmb(bool weak_barriers)
{
if (weak_barriers)
- smp_rmb();
+ virt_rmb();
else
rmb();
}
@@ -41,26 +40,10 @@ static inline void virtio_rmb(bool weak_barriers)
static inline void virtio_wmb(bool weak_barriers)
{
if (weak_barriers)
- smp_wmb();
+ virt_wmb();
else
wmb();
}
-#else
-static inline void virtio_mb(bool weak_barriers)
-{
- mb();
-}
-
-static inline void virtio_rmb(bool weak_barriers)
-{
- rmb();
-}
-
-static inline void virtio_wmb(bool weak_barriers)
-{
- wmb();
-}
-#endif
struct virtio_device;
struct virtqueue;
virtio ring uses smp_wmb on SMP and wmb on !SMP, the reason for the later being that it might be talking to another kernel on the same SMP machine. This is exactly what virt_xxx barriers do, so switch to these instead of homegrown ifdef hacks. Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> --- include/linux/virtio_ring.h | 25 ++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)