diff mbox

[26/33] x86/kvm: Add stack frame dependency to test_cc() inline asm

Message ID affc672d13100eb0c743b8c7ce88c47a104161bf.1453405861.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Josh Poimboeuf Jan. 21, 2016, 10:49 p.m. UTC
With some configs, gcc doesn't inline test_cc().  When that happens, it
doesn't create a stack frame before inserting the call instruction.
This breaks frame pointer convention if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER is enabled
and can result in a bad stack trace.

Force a stack frame to be created if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER is enabled by
listing the stack pointer as an output operand for the inline asm
statement.

Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
---
 arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Paolo Bonzini Jan. 22, 2016, 10:05 a.m. UTC | #1
On 21/01/2016 23:49, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> With some configs, gcc doesn't inline test_cc().  When that happens, it
> doesn't create a stack frame before inserting the call instruction.
> This breaks frame pointer convention if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER is enabled
> and can result in a bad stack trace.
> 
> Force a stack frame to be created if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER is enabled by
> listing the stack pointer as an output operand for the inline asm
> statement.

If an __always_inline allocation works, that would be better.

Paolo

> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> index aa4d726..7dba65a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> @@ -972,11 +972,13 @@ static int em_bsr_c(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
>  static u8 test_cc(unsigned int condition, unsigned long flags)
>  {
>  	u8 rc;
> +	register void *__sp asm(_ASM_SP);
>  	void (*fop)(void) = (void *)em_setcc + 4 * (condition & 0xf);
>  
>  	flags = (flags & EFLAGS_MASK) | X86_EFLAGS_IF;
>  	asm("push %[flags]; popf; call *%[fastop]"
> -	    : "=a"(rc) : [fastop]"r"(fop), [flags]"r"(flags));
> +	    : "=a"(rc), "+r"(__sp)
> +	    : [fastop]"r"(fop), [flags]"r"(flags));
>  	return rc;
>  }
>  
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Josh Poimboeuf Jan. 22, 2016, 4:02 p.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:05:06AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> 
> On 21/01/2016 23:49, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > With some configs, gcc doesn't inline test_cc().  When that happens, it
> > doesn't create a stack frame before inserting the call instruction.
> > This breaks frame pointer convention if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER is enabled
> > and can result in a bad stack trace.
> > 
> > Force a stack frame to be created if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER is enabled by
> > listing the stack pointer as an output operand for the inline asm
> > statement.
> 
> If an __always_inline allocation works, that would be better.

Yeah, that seems to work.  I'll update the patch.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
index aa4d726..7dba65a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
@@ -972,11 +972,13 @@  static int em_bsr_c(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
 static u8 test_cc(unsigned int condition, unsigned long flags)
 {
 	u8 rc;
+	register void *__sp asm(_ASM_SP);
 	void (*fop)(void) = (void *)em_setcc + 4 * (condition & 0xf);
 
 	flags = (flags & EFLAGS_MASK) | X86_EFLAGS_IF;
 	asm("push %[flags]; popf; call *%[fastop]"
-	    : "=a"(rc) : [fastop]"r"(fop), [flags]"r"(flags));
+	    : "=a"(rc), "+r"(__sp)
+	    : [fastop]"r"(fop), [flags]"r"(flags));
 	return rc;
 }