[01/13] btrfs: Introduce a new function to check if all chunks a OK for degraded mount
diff mbox

Message ID 1460470563-752-2-git-send-email-anand.jain@oracle.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Anand Jain April 12, 2016, 2:15 p.m. UTC
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>

Introduce a new function, btrfs_check_degradable(), to judge if all chunks
in btrfs is OK for degraded mount.

It provides the new basis for accurate btrfs mount/remount and even
runtime degraded mount check other than old one-size-fit-all method.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 fs/btrfs/volumes.h |  1 +
 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+)

Comments

Yauhen Kharuzhy April 12, 2016, 7:21 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:15:51PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
> 
> Introduce a new function, btrfs_check_degradable(), to judge if all chunks
> in btrfs is OK for degraded mount.
> 
> It provides the new basis for accurate btrfs mount/remount and even
> runtime degraded mount check other than old one-size-fit-all method.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  fs/btrfs/volumes.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 64 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index 9d72dabdddfc..a351c5dd9e9b 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -7039,3 +7039,66 @@ static void btrfs_close_one_device(struct btrfs_device *device)
>  
>  	call_rcu(&device->rcu, free_device);
>  }
> +
> +/*
> + * Check if all chunks in the fs is OK for degraded mount
> + * Caller itself should do extra check if DEGRADED mount option is given
> + * for >0 return value.
> + *
> + * Return 0 if all chunks are OK.
> + * Return >0 if all chunks are degradable but not all OK.
> + * Return <0 if any chunk is not degradable or other bug.
> + */
> +int btrfs_check_degradable(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, unsigned flags)
> +{
> +	struct btrfs_mapping_tree *map_tree = &fs_info->mapping_tree;
> +	struct extent_map *em;
> +	u64 next_start = 0;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	if (flags & MS_RDONLY)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	read_lock(&map_tree->map_tree.lock);
> +	em = lookup_extent_mapping(&map_tree->map_tree, 0, (u64)(-1));
> +	/* No any chunk? Should be a huge bug */
> +	if (!em) {
> +		ret = -ENOENT;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	while (em) {
> +		struct map_lookup *map;
> +		int missing = 0;
> +		int max_tolerated;
> +		int i;
> +
> +		map = (struct map_lookup *) em->bdev;
> +		max_tolerated =
> +			btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures(
> +					map->type);
> +		for (i = 0; i < map->num_stripes; i++) {
> +			if (map->stripes[i].dev->missing)
> +				missing++;
> +		}
> +		if (missing > max_tolerated) {
> +			ret = -EIO;
> +			btrfs_warn(fs_info,
> +				   "missing devices(%d) exceeds the limit(%d), writebale mount is not allowed",
> +				   missing, max_tolerated);

Typo: s/writebale/writeable/

Patch
diff mbox

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 9d72dabdddfc..a351c5dd9e9b 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -7039,3 +7039,66 @@  static void btrfs_close_one_device(struct btrfs_device *device)
 
 	call_rcu(&device->rcu, free_device);
 }
+
+/*
+ * Check if all chunks in the fs is OK for degraded mount
+ * Caller itself should do extra check if DEGRADED mount option is given
+ * for >0 return value.
+ *
+ * Return 0 if all chunks are OK.
+ * Return >0 if all chunks are degradable but not all OK.
+ * Return <0 if any chunk is not degradable or other bug.
+ */
+int btrfs_check_degradable(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, unsigned flags)
+{
+	struct btrfs_mapping_tree *map_tree = &fs_info->mapping_tree;
+	struct extent_map *em;
+	u64 next_start = 0;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	if (flags & MS_RDONLY)
+		return 0;
+
+	read_lock(&map_tree->map_tree.lock);
+	em = lookup_extent_mapping(&map_tree->map_tree, 0, (u64)(-1));
+	/* No any chunk? Should be a huge bug */
+	if (!em) {
+		ret = -ENOENT;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	while (em) {
+		struct map_lookup *map;
+		int missing = 0;
+		int max_tolerated;
+		int i;
+
+		map = (struct map_lookup *) em->bdev;
+		max_tolerated =
+			btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures(
+					map->type);
+		for (i = 0; i < map->num_stripes; i++) {
+			if (map->stripes[i].dev->missing)
+				missing++;
+		}
+		if (missing > max_tolerated) {
+			ret = -EIO;
+			btrfs_warn(fs_info,
+				   "missing devices(%d) exceeds the limit(%d), writebale mount is not allowed",
+				   missing, max_tolerated);
+			goto out;
+		} else if (missing)
+			ret = 1;
+		next_start = extent_map_end(em);
+
+		/*
+		 * Alwasy search range [next_start, (u64)-1) to find the next
+		 * chunk map
+		 */
+		em = lookup_extent_mapping(&map_tree->map_tree, next_start,
+					   (u64)(-1) - next_start);
+	}
+out:
+	read_unlock(&map_tree->map_tree.lock);
+	return ret;
+}
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
index 1939ebde63df..351431a3f5aa 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
@@ -566,5 +566,6 @@  static inline void unlock_chunks(struct btrfs_root *root)
 struct list_head *btrfs_get_fs_uuids(void);
 void btrfs_set_fs_info_ptr(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
 void btrfs_reset_fs_info_ptr(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
+int btrfs_check_degradable(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, unsigned flags);
 
 #endif