[11/13] btrfs: introduce device dynamic state transition to offline or failed
diff mbox

Message ID 1460979104-27497-12-git-send-email-anand.jain@oracle.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Anand Jain April 18, 2016, 11:31 a.m. UTC
From: Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@oracle.com>

This patch provides helper functions to force a device to offline
or failed, and we need this device states for the following reasons,
1) a. it can be reported that device has failed when it does
   b. close the device when it goes offline so that blocklayer can
      cleanup
2) identify the candidate for the auto replace
3) avoid further commit error reported against the failing device and
4) a device in the multi device btrfs may go offline from the system
   (but as of now in in some system config btrfs gets unmounted in this
    context, which is not a correct behavior)

Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Tested-by: Austin S. Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@gmail.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 131 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 fs/btrfs/volumes.h |  14 ++++++
 2 files changed, 145 insertions(+)

Comments

kbuild test robot April 18, 2016, 12:59 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Anand,

[auto build test ERROR on btrfs/next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.6-rc4 next-20160418]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improving the system]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Anand-Jain/Introduce-device-state-failed-spare-device-and-auto-replace/20160418-195801
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git next
config: i386-randconfig-x003-201616 (attached as .config)
reproduce:
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make ARCH=i386 

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   fs/btrfs/volumes.c: In function 'device_force_close':
>> fs/btrfs/volumes.c:7189:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'btrfs_assign_next_active_device' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     btrfs_assign_next_active_device(fs_devices->fs_info, device, NULL);
     ^
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

vim +/btrfs_assign_next_active_device +7189 fs/btrfs/volumes.c

  7183		fs_devices = device->fs_devices;
  7184	
  7185		mutex_lock(&fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
  7186		mutex_lock(&fs_devices->fs_info->chunk_mutex);
  7187		spin_lock(&fs_devices->fs_info->free_chunk_lock);
  7188	
> 7189		btrfs_assign_next_active_device(fs_devices->fs_info, device, NULL);
  7190	
  7191		if (device->bdev)
  7192			fs_devices->open_devices--;

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation

Patch
diff mbox

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 86f4efbf2374..617e54f5fd19 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -7176,3 +7176,134 @@  out:
 	free_extent_map(em);
 	return ret;
 }
+
+static void __close_device(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct btrfs_device *device;
+
+	device = container_of(work, struct btrfs_device, rcu_work);
+
+	if (device->closing_bdev)
+		blkdev_put(device->closing_bdev, device->mode);
+
+	device->closing_bdev = NULL;
+}
+
+static void close_device(struct rcu_head *head)
+{
+	struct btrfs_device *device;
+
+	device = container_of(head, struct btrfs_device, rcu);
+
+	INIT_WORK(&device->rcu_work, __close_device);
+	schedule_work(&device->rcu_work);
+}
+
+void device_force_close(struct btrfs_device *device)
+{
+	struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices;
+
+	fs_devices = device->fs_devices;
+
+	mutex_lock(&fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
+	mutex_lock(&fs_devices->fs_info->chunk_mutex);
+	spin_lock(&fs_devices->fs_info->free_chunk_lock);
+
+	btrfs_assign_next_active_device(fs_devices->fs_info, device, NULL);
+
+	if (device->bdev)
+		fs_devices->open_devices--;
+
+	if (device->writeable) {
+		list_del_init(&device->dev_alloc_list);
+		fs_devices->rw_devices--;
+	}
+	device->writeable = 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * fixme: works for now, but its better to keep the state of
+	 * missing and offline different, and update rest of the
+	 * places where we check for only missing and not for failed
+	 * or offline as of now.
+	 */
+	device->missing = 1;
+	fs_devices->missing_devices++;
+	device->closing_bdev = device->bdev;
+	device->bdev = NULL;
+
+	call_rcu(&device->rcu, close_device);
+
+	spin_unlock(&fs_devices->fs_info->free_chunk_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&fs_devices->fs_info->chunk_mutex);
+	mutex_unlock(&fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
+
+	rcu_barrier();
+}
+
+void btrfs_device_enforce_state(struct btrfs_device *dev, char *why)
+{
+	int tolerance;
+	bool degrade_option;
+	char dev_status[10];
+	char chunk_status[25];
+	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info;
+	struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices;
+
+	fs_devices = dev->fs_devices;
+	fs_info = fs_devices->fs_info;
+	degrade_option = btrfs_test_opt(fs_info->fs_root, DEGRADED);
+
+	/* todo: support seed later */
+	if (fs_devices->seeding)
+		return;
+
+	/* this shouldn't be called if device is already missing */
+	if (dev->missing || !dev->bdev)
+		return;
+
+	if (dev->offline || dev->failed)
+		return;
+
+	/* Only RW device is requested to force close let FS handle it*/
+	if (fs_devices->rw_devices == 1) {
+		btrfs_std_error(fs_info, -EIO,
+			"force offline last RW device");
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if (!strcmp(why, "offline"))
+		dev->offline = 1;
+	else if (!strcmp(why, "failed"))
+		dev->failed = 1;
+	else
+		return;
+
+	/*
+	 * Here after, there shouldn't any reason why can't force
+	 * close this device
+	 */
+	btrfs_sysfs_rm_device_link(fs_devices, dev);
+	device_force_close(dev);
+	strcpy(dev_status, "closed");
+
+	tolerance = btrfs_check_degradable(fs_info,
+						fs_info->sb->s_flags);
+	if (tolerance > 0) {
+		strncpy(chunk_status, "chunk(s) degraded", 25);
+	} else if(tolerance < 0) {
+		strncpy(chunk_status, "chunk(s) failed", 25);
+	} else {
+		strncpy(chunk_status, "No chunk(s) are degraded", 25);
+	}
+
+	btrfs_warn_in_rcu(fs_info, "device %s marked %s, %s, %s",
+		rcu_str_deref(dev->name), why, dev_status, chunk_status);
+	btrfs_info_in_rcu(fs_info,
+		"num_devices %llu rw_devices %llu degraded-option: %s",
+		fs_devices->num_devices, fs_devices->rw_devices,
+		degrade_option ? "set":"unset");
+
+	if (tolerance < 0)
+		btrfs_std_error(fs_info, -EIO, "devices below critical level");
+
+}
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
index 12e08261b4c8..cc006283a12e 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
@@ -66,13 +66,26 @@  struct btrfs_device {
 	struct btrfs_pending_bios pending_sync_bios;
 
 	struct block_device *bdev;
+	struct block_device *closing_bdev;
 
 	/* the mode sent to blkdev_get */
 	fmode_t mode;
 
 	int writeable;
 	int in_fs_metadata;
+	/* missing: device wasn't found at the time of mount */
 	int missing;
+	/* failed: device confirmed to have experienced critical io failure */
+	int failed;
+	/*
+	 * offline: system or user or block layer transport has removed
+	 * offlined the device which was once present and without going
+	 * through unmount. Implies an intriem communication break down
+	 * and not necessarily a candidate for the device replace. And
+	 * device might be online after user intervention or after
+	 * block transport layer error recovery.
+	 */
+	int offline;
 	int can_discard;
 	int is_tgtdev_for_dev_replace;
 
@@ -577,5 +590,6 @@  struct list_head *btrfs_get_fs_uuids(void);
 void btrfs_set_fs_info_ptr(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
 void btrfs_reset_fs_info_ptr(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
 int btrfs_check_degradable(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, unsigned flags);
+void btrfs_device_enforce_state(struct btrfs_device *dev, char *why);
 
 #endif