@@ -690,7 +690,6 @@ int snd_pcm_dshare_open(snd_pcm_t **pcmp, const char *name,
break;
}
- retry:
first_instance = ret = snd_pcm_direct_shm_create_or_connect(dshare);
if (ret < 0) {
SNDERR("unable to create IPC shm instance");
@@ -705,6 +704,7 @@ int snd_pcm_dshare_open(snd_pcm_t **pcmp, const char *name,
dshare->max_periods = opts->max_periods;
dshare->sync_ptr = snd_pcm_dshare_sync_ptr;
+ retry:
if (first_instance) {
/* recursion is already checked in
snd_pcm_direct_get_slave_ipc_offset() */
@@ -583,7 +583,6 @@ int snd_pcm_dsnoop_open(snd_pcm_t **pcmp, const char *name,
break;
}
- retry:
first_instance = ret = snd_pcm_direct_shm_create_or_connect(dsnoop);
if (ret < 0) {
SNDERR("unable to create IPC shm instance");
@@ -598,6 +597,7 @@ int snd_pcm_dsnoop_open(snd_pcm_t **pcmp, const char *name,
dsnoop->max_periods = opts->max_periods;
dsnoop->sync_ptr = snd_pcm_dsnoop_sync_ptr;
+ retry:
if (first_instance) {
/* recursion is already checked in
snd_pcm_direct_get_slave_ipc_offset() */
The commit [fdba9e1bad8f: pcm: Fallback open as the first instance for dmix & co] introduced a mechanism to retry the open of slave PCM for the secondary streams, but this also introduced a regression in dsnoop and dshare plugins: since the retry goto-tag was placed at a wrong position, it retries to re-fetch the shm unnecessarily and eventually leads to the fatal error. The bug can be easily reproduced by starting arecord and killing it via SIGKILL, then starting arecord again. The second arecord fails. The fix is obviously to move the wrong retry goto-tags to the right positions. Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> --- src/pcm/pcm_dshare.c | 2 +- src/pcm/pcm_dsnoop.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)