diff mbox

[01/28] crypto: omap-aes: Fix registration of algorithms

Message ID 1464771389-10640-2-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Tero Kristo June 1, 2016, 8:56 a.m. UTC 
From: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>

Algorithms can be registered only once. So skip registration of
algorithms if already registered (i.e. in case we have two AES cores
in the system.)

Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
---
 drivers/crypto/omap-aes.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Comments

Herbert Xu June 7, 2016, 10:48 a.m. UTC | #1 
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 11:56:02AM +0300, Tero Kristo wrote:
> From: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
> 
> Algorithms can be registered only once. So skip registration of
> algorithms if already registered (i.e. in case we have two AES cores
> in the system.)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>

Patch applied.  Thanks.
Tero Kristo June 20, 2016, 12:11 p.m. UTC | #2 
On 07/06/16 13:48, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 11:56:02AM +0300, Tero Kristo wrote:
>> From: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
>>
>> Algorithms can be registered only once. So skip registration of
>> algorithms if already registered (i.e. in case we have two AES cores
>> in the system.)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
>
> Patch applied.  Thanks.
>

Thanks,

Did you check the rest of the series? I only got feedback for this and 
patch #2 on the series, shall I repost the remainder of the series as a 
whole or...?

-Tero
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Herbert Xu June 20, 2016, 11:49 p.m. UTC | #3 
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 03:11:54PM +0300, Tero Kristo wrote:
>
> Did you check the rest of the series? I only got feedback for this
> and patch #2 on the series, shall I repost the remainder of the
> series as a whole or...?

Yes please repost them.

Thanks,
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/crypto/omap-aes.c b/drivers/crypto/omap-aes.c
index ce174d3..4a0e6a5 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/omap-aes.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/omap-aes.c
@@ -1185,17 +1185,19 @@  static int omap_aes_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	spin_unlock(&list_lock);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < dd->pdata->algs_info_size; i++) {
-		for (j = 0; j < dd->pdata->algs_info[i].size; j++) {
-			algp = &dd->pdata->algs_info[i].algs_list[j];
+		if (!dd->pdata->algs_info[i].registered) {
+			for (j = 0; j < dd->pdata->algs_info[i].size; j++) {
+				algp = &dd->pdata->algs_info[i].algs_list[j];
 
-			pr_debug("reg alg: %s\n", algp->cra_name);
-			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&algp->cra_list);
+				pr_debug("reg alg: %s\n", algp->cra_name);
+				INIT_LIST_HEAD(&algp->cra_list);
 
-			err = crypto_register_alg(algp);
-			if (err)
-				goto err_algs;
+				err = crypto_register_alg(algp);
+				if (err)
+					goto err_algs;
 
-			dd->pdata->algs_info[i].registered++;
+				dd->pdata->algs_info[i].registered++;
+			}
 		}
 	}