diff mbox

[2/2] KVM: arm/arm64: Rename vgic_attr_regs_access to vgic_attr_regs_access_v2

Message ID 20160816151034.16930-3-christoffer.dall@linaro.org (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Christoffer Dall Aug. 16, 2016, 3:10 p.m. UTC
Just a rename so we can implement a v3-specific function later.  No
functional change.

Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
---
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Comments

Andrew Jones Aug. 16, 2016, 4:09 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 05:10:34PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> Just a rename so we can implement a v3-specific function later.  No
> functional change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
> ---
>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c
> index 22d7ab3..2e18f03 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c
> @@ -296,17 +296,20 @@ static bool lock_all_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm)
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> -/** vgic_attr_regs_access: allows user space to read/write VGIC registers
> - *
> - * @dev: kvm device handle
> - * @attr: kvm device attribute
> - * @reg: address the value is read or written
> - * @is_write: write flag
> +/* V2 ops */
> +
> +

Do we want 2 blank lines here? Do we need the 'V2 ops' comment at all?

> +/**
> + * vgic_attr_regs_access_v2 - allows user space to access VGIC v2 state
>   *
> + * @dev:      kvm device handle
> + * @attr:     kvm device attribute
> + * @reg:      address the value is read or written
> + * @is_write: true if userspace is writing a register
>   */
> -static int vgic_attr_regs_access(struct kvm_device *dev,
> -				 struct kvm_device_attr *attr,
> -				 u32 *reg, bool is_write)
> +static int vgic_attr_regs_access_v2(struct kvm_device *dev,
> +				    struct kvm_device_attr *attr,
> +				    u32 *reg, bool is_write)
>  {
>  	struct vgic_reg_attr reg_attr;
>  	gpa_t addr;
> @@ -349,8 +352,6 @@ out:
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -/* V2 ops */
> -
>  static int vgic_v2_set_attr(struct kvm_device *dev,
>  			    struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
>  {
> @@ -369,7 +370,7 @@ static int vgic_v2_set_attr(struct kvm_device *dev,
>  		if (get_user(reg, uaddr))
>  			return -EFAULT;
>  
> -		return vgic_attr_regs_access(dev, attr, &reg, true);
> +		return vgic_attr_regs_access_v2(dev, attr, &reg, true);
>  	}
>  	}
>  
> @@ -391,7 +392,7 @@ static int vgic_v2_get_attr(struct kvm_device *dev,
>  		u32 __user *uaddr = (u32 __user *)(long)attr->addr;
>  		u32 reg = 0;
>  
> -		ret = vgic_attr_regs_access(dev, attr, &reg, false);
> +		ret = vgic_attr_regs_access_v2(dev, attr, &reg, false);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
>  		return put_user(reg, uaddr);
> -- 
> 2.9.0
>

No better way to attract reviewers than to advertise no functional
change :-)

Looks good to me.

drew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Christoffer Dall Aug. 16, 2016, 5:35 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 06:09:24PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 05:10:34PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > Just a rename so we can implement a v3-specific function later.  No
> > functional change.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
> >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c
> > index 22d7ab3..2e18f03 100644
> > --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c
> > +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c
> > @@ -296,17 +296,20 @@ static bool lock_all_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm)
> >  	return true;
> >  }
> >  
> > -/** vgic_attr_regs_access: allows user space to read/write VGIC registers
> > - *
> > - * @dev: kvm device handle
> > - * @attr: kvm device attribute
> > - * @reg: address the value is read or written
> > - * @is_write: write flag
> > +/* V2 ops */
> > +
> > +
> 
> Do we want 2 blank lines here? Do we need the 'V2 ops' comment at all?
> 
> > +/**
> > + * vgic_attr_regs_access_v2 - allows user space to access VGIC v2 state
> >   *
> > + * @dev:      kvm device handle
> > + * @attr:     kvm device attribute
> > + * @reg:      address the value is read or written
> > + * @is_write: true if userspace is writing a register
> >   */
> > -static int vgic_attr_regs_access(struct kvm_device *dev,
> > -				 struct kvm_device_attr *attr,
> > -				 u32 *reg, bool is_write)
> > +static int vgic_attr_regs_access_v2(struct kvm_device *dev,
> > +				    struct kvm_device_attr *attr,
> > +				    u32 *reg, bool is_write)
> >  {
> >  	struct vgic_reg_attr reg_attr;
> >  	gpa_t addr;
> > @@ -349,8 +352,6 @@ out:
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> > -/* V2 ops */
> > -
> >  static int vgic_v2_set_attr(struct kvm_device *dev,
> >  			    struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> >  {
> > @@ -369,7 +370,7 @@ static int vgic_v2_set_attr(struct kvm_device *dev,
> >  		if (get_user(reg, uaddr))
> >  			return -EFAULT;
> >  
> > -		return vgic_attr_regs_access(dev, attr, &reg, true);
> > +		return vgic_attr_regs_access_v2(dev, attr, &reg, true);
> >  	}
> >  	}
> >  
> > @@ -391,7 +392,7 @@ static int vgic_v2_get_attr(struct kvm_device *dev,
> >  		u32 __user *uaddr = (u32 __user *)(long)attr->addr;
> >  		u32 reg = 0;
> >  
> > -		ret = vgic_attr_regs_access(dev, attr, &reg, false);
> > +		ret = vgic_attr_regs_access_v2(dev, attr, &reg, false);
> >  		if (ret)
> >  			return ret;
> >  		return put_user(reg, uaddr);
> > -- 
> > 2.9.0
> >
> 
> No better way to attract reviewers than to advertise no functional
> change :-)
> 
> Looks good to me.
> 
Thanks for the quick review!

v2 has been sent, hopefully Vijay can pick these up from here and
include in his series.

Thanks,
-Christoffer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c
index 22d7ab3..2e18f03 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c
@@ -296,17 +296,20 @@  static bool lock_all_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm)
 	return true;
 }
 
-/** vgic_attr_regs_access: allows user space to read/write VGIC registers
- *
- * @dev: kvm device handle
- * @attr: kvm device attribute
- * @reg: address the value is read or written
- * @is_write: write flag
+/* V2 ops */
+
+
+/**
+ * vgic_attr_regs_access_v2 - allows user space to access VGIC v2 state
  *
+ * @dev:      kvm device handle
+ * @attr:     kvm device attribute
+ * @reg:      address the value is read or written
+ * @is_write: true if userspace is writing a register
  */
-static int vgic_attr_regs_access(struct kvm_device *dev,
-				 struct kvm_device_attr *attr,
-				 u32 *reg, bool is_write)
+static int vgic_attr_regs_access_v2(struct kvm_device *dev,
+				    struct kvm_device_attr *attr,
+				    u32 *reg, bool is_write)
 {
 	struct vgic_reg_attr reg_attr;
 	gpa_t addr;
@@ -349,8 +352,6 @@  out:
 	return ret;
 }
 
-/* V2 ops */
-
 static int vgic_v2_set_attr(struct kvm_device *dev,
 			    struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
 {
@@ -369,7 +370,7 @@  static int vgic_v2_set_attr(struct kvm_device *dev,
 		if (get_user(reg, uaddr))
 			return -EFAULT;
 
-		return vgic_attr_regs_access(dev, attr, &reg, true);
+		return vgic_attr_regs_access_v2(dev, attr, &reg, true);
 	}
 	}
 
@@ -391,7 +392,7 @@  static int vgic_v2_get_attr(struct kvm_device *dev,
 		u32 __user *uaddr = (u32 __user *)(long)attr->addr;
 		u32 reg = 0;
 
-		ret = vgic_attr_regs_access(dev, attr, &reg, false);
+		ret = vgic_attr_regs_access_v2(dev, attr, &reg, false);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 		return put_user(reg, uaddr);