diff mbox

ocfs2: free the mle while the res had one, to avoid mle memory leak.

Message ID 71604351584F6A4EBAE558C676F37CA4A3D3522A@H3CMLB12-EX.srv.huawei-3com.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Guozhonghua Sept. 13, 2016, 7:52 a.m. UTC
In the function dlm_migrate_request_handler, while the ret is --EEXIST, the mle should be freed, otherwise the memory will be leaked.

Signed-off-by: Guozhonghua <guozhonghua@h3c.com>



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
本邮件及其附件含有杭州华三通信技术有限公司的保密信息,仅限于发送给上面地址中列出
的个人或群组。禁止任何其他人以任何形式使用(包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、
或散发)本邮件中的信息。如果您错收了本邮件,请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本
邮件!
This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from H3C, which is
intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the
information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial
disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended
recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender
by phone or email immediately and delete it!

Comments

Zhen Ren Sept. 13, 2016, 8:56 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi,
On 09/13/2016 03:52 PM, Guozhonghua wrote:
> In the function dlm_migrate_request_handler, while the ret is --EEXIST, the mle should be freed, otherwise the memory will be leaked.

Keep your commit comments within 75 or 78 (I don't remember clearly but git will warn
if you don't keep its rule) characters per line.
>

> Signed-off-by: Guozhonghua <guozhonghua@h3c.com>

>

> --- ocfs2.orig/dlm/dlmmaster.c  2016-09-13 15:18:13.602684325 +0800

Please use `git format-patch` to create patch. FYI:
http://wiki.openhatch.org/How_to_generate_patches_with_git_format-patch

Sorry, I don't familiar with ocfs2/dlm code, so cannot review this patch.

Eric
> +++ ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c       2016-09-13 15:27:05.014675736 +0800

> @@ -3188,6 +3188,9 @@ int dlm_migrate_request_handler(struct o

>                                      migrate->new_master,

>                                      migrate->master);

>

> +       if (ret < 0)

> +               kmem_cache_free(dlm_mle_cache, mle);

> +

>          spin_unlock(&dlm->master_lock);

>   unlock:

>          spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock);

>

>

> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

> 本邮件及其附件含有杭州华三通信技术有限公司的保密信息,仅限于发送给上面地址中列出

> 的个人或群组。禁止任何其他人以任何形式使用(包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、

> 或散发)本邮件中的信息。如果您错收了本邮件,请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本

> 邮件!

> This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from H3C, which is

> intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the

> information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial

> disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended

> recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender

> by phone or email immediately and delete it!

> _______________________________________________

> Ocfs2-devel mailing list

> Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com

> https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
Andrew Morton Sept. 13, 2016, 9:20 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 07:52:30 +0000 Guozhonghua <guozhonghua@h3c.com> wrote:

> In the function dlm_migrate_request_handler, while the ret is --EEXIST, the mle should be freed, otherwise the memory will be leaked.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Guozhonghua <guozhonghua@h3c.com>
> 
> --- ocfs2.orig/dlm/dlmmaster.c  2016-09-13 15:18:13.602684325 +0800
> +++ ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c       2016-09-13 15:27:05.014675736 +0800
> @@ -3188,6 +3188,9 @@ int dlm_migrate_request_handler(struct o
>                                     migrate->new_master,
>                                     migrate->master);
> 
> +       if (ret < 0)
> +               kmem_cache_free(dlm_mle_cache, mle);
> +
>         spin_unlock(&dlm->master_lock);
>  unlock:
>         spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock);

Looks OK to me.

I wonder if there's another bug here.  If dlm_add_migration_mle()
failed, is it correct to go ahead and detach `oldmle'?
Joseph Qi Sept. 14, 2016, 1:37 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi Andrew,
-EEXIST can only happen in case of "I am the master". So
dlm_migrate_request_handler won't get this return value.
I think commit 32e493265b2b ("ocfs2/dlm: do not insert a new mle when
another process is already migrating") has already considered the
case.
So NAK.

Thanks,
Joseph

On 2016/9/14 5:20, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 07:52:30 +0000 Guozhonghua <guozhonghua@h3c.com> wrote:
> 
>> In the function dlm_migrate_request_handler, while the ret is --EEXIST, the mle should be freed, otherwise the memory will be leaked.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Guozhonghua <guozhonghua@h3c.com>
>>
>> --- ocfs2.orig/dlm/dlmmaster.c  2016-09-13 15:18:13.602684325 +0800
>> +++ ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c       2016-09-13 15:27:05.014675736 +0800
>> @@ -3188,6 +3188,9 @@ int dlm_migrate_request_handler(struct o
>>                                     migrate->new_master,
>>                                     migrate->master);
>>
>> +       if (ret < 0)
>> +               kmem_cache_free(dlm_mle_cache, mle);
>> +
>>         spin_unlock(&dlm->master_lock);
>>  unlock:
>>         spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock);
> 
> Looks OK to me.
> 
> I wonder if there's another bug here.  If dlm_add_migration_mle()
> failed, is it correct to go ahead and detach `oldmle'?
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ocfs2-devel mailing list
> Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
> https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
> 
>
diff mbox

Patch

--- ocfs2.orig/dlm/dlmmaster.c  2016-09-13 15:18:13.602684325 +0800
+++ ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c       2016-09-13 15:27:05.014675736 +0800
@@ -3188,6 +3188,9 @@  int dlm_migrate_request_handler(struct o
                                    migrate->new_master,
                                    migrate->master);

+       if (ret < 0)
+               kmem_cache_free(dlm_mle_cache, mle);
+
        spin_unlock(&dlm->master_lock);
 unlock:
        spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock);