| Message ID | 1475604730-140264-2-git-send-email-briannorris@chromium.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
Hi, On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> wrote: > The "arm,no-tick-in-suspend" property was introduced to note > implementations where the system counter does not quite follow the ARM > specification that it "must be implemented in an always-on power > domain". > > Particularly, RK3399's counter stops ticking when we switch from the > 24MHz clock to the 32KHz clock in low-power suspend, so let's mark it as > such. > > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> > --- > v2: new in v2 > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi index 76b28649f0b0..401c8be8c8ac 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi @@ -174,6 +174,7 @@ <GIC_PPI 14 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW 0>, <GIC_PPI 11 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW 0>, <GIC_PPI 10 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW 0>; + arm,no-tick-in-suspend; }; xin24m: xin24m {
The "arm,no-tick-in-suspend" property was introduced to note implementations where the system counter does not quite follow the ARM specification that it "must be implemented in an always-on power domain". Particularly, RK3399's counter stops ticking when we switch from the 24MHz clock to the 32KHz clock in low-power suspend, so let's mark it as such. Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> --- v2: new in v2 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)