diff mbox

[1/7] genirq/affinity: Introduce struct irq_affinity

Message ID 1478544462-9549-2-git-send-email-hch@lst.de (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Christoph Hellwig Nov. 7, 2016, 6:47 p.m. UTC
From: Christogh Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

Some drivers (various network and RDMA adapter for example) have a MSI-X
vector layout where most of the vectors are used for I/O queues and should
have CPU affinity assigned to them, but some (usually 1 but sometimes more)
at the beginning or end are used for low-performance admin or configuration
work and should not have any explicit affinity assigned to them.

This adds a new irq_affinity structure, which will be passed through a
variant of pci_irq_alloc_vectors that allows to specify these
requirements (and is extensible to any future quirks in that area) so that
the core IRQ affinity algorithm can take this quirks into account.

Signed-off-by: Christogh Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 include/linux/interrupt.h | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

Comments

Hannes Reinecke Nov. 8, 2016, 8:11 a.m. UTC | #1
On 11/07/2016 07:47 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> From: Christogh Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>
> Some drivers (various network and RDMA adapter for example) have a MSI-X
> vector layout where most of the vectors are used for I/O queues and should
> have CPU affinity assigned to them, but some (usually 1 but sometimes more)
> at the beginning or end are used for low-performance admin or configuration
> work and should not have any explicit affinity assigned to them.
>
> This adds a new irq_affinity structure, which will be passed through a
> variant of pci_irq_alloc_vectors that allows to specify these
> requirements (and is extensible to any future quirks in that area) so that
> the core IRQ affinity algorithm can take this quirks into account.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christogh Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  include/linux/interrupt.h | 12 ++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/interrupt.h b/include/linux/interrupt.h
> index 72f0721..7284bcd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/interrupt.h
> +++ b/include/linux/interrupt.h
> @@ -232,6 +232,18 @@ struct irq_affinity_notify {
>  	void (*release)(struct kref *ref);
>  };
>
> +/**
> + * struct irq_affinity - Description for auto irq affinity assignements
> + * @pre_vectors:	Reserved vectors at the beginning of the MSIX
> + *			vector space
> + * @post_vectors:	Reserved vectors at the end of the MSIX
> + *			vector space
> + */
> +struct irq_affinity {
> +	int	pre_vectors;
> +	int	post_vectors;
> +};
> +
>  #if defined(CONFIG_SMP)
>
>  extern cpumask_var_t irq_default_affinity;
>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>

Cheers,

Hannes
Johannes Thumshirn Nov. 8, 2016, 8:19 a.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 10:47:36AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> From: Christogh Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> 
> Some drivers (various network and RDMA adapter for example) have a MSI-X
> vector layout where most of the vectors are used for I/O queues and should
> have CPU affinity assigned to them, but some (usually 1 but sometimes more)
> at the beginning or end are used for low-performance admin or configuration
> work and should not have any explicit affinity assigned to them.
> 
> This adds a new irq_affinity structure, which will be passed through a
> variant of pci_irq_alloc_vectors that allows to specify these
> requirements (and is extensible to any future quirks in that area) so that
> the core IRQ affinity algorithm can take this quirks into account.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christogh Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---

Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Bjorn Helgaas Nov. 8, 2016, 9:25 p.m. UTC | #3
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 10:47:36AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> From: Christogh Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> 
> Some drivers (various network and RDMA adapter for example) have a MSI-X
> vector layout where most of the vectors are used for I/O queues and should
> have CPU affinity assigned to them, but some (usually 1 but sometimes more)
> at the beginning or end are used for low-performance admin or configuration
> work and should not have any explicit affinity assigned to them.
> 
> This adds a new irq_affinity structure, which will be passed through a
> variant of pci_irq_alloc_vectors that allows to specify these
> requirements (and is extensible to any future quirks in that area) so that
> the core IRQ affinity algorithm can take this quirks into account.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christogh Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

s/Christogh/Christoph/ (also above)

What tree would you prefer?  I vote for the IRQ tree since that seems
to be where the interesting parts are, and I think I acked all the PCI
bits.

> + * struct irq_affinity - Description for auto irq affinity assignements
> + * @pre_vectors:	Reserved vectors at the beginning of the MSIX
> + *			vector space
> + * @post_vectors:	Reserved vectors at the end of the MSIX
> + *			vector space

Maybe include something more informative than just "reserved", e.g.,
"Don't apply affinity to @pre_vectors at beginning of MSI-X vector
space" or "Vectors at beginning of MSI-X vector space that are exempt
from affinity"?

> + */
> +struct irq_affinity {
> +	int	pre_vectors;
> +	int	post_vectors;
> +};
> +
>  #if defined(CONFIG_SMP)
>  
>  extern cpumask_var_t irq_default_affinity;
> -- 
> 2.1.4
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Christoph Hellwig Nov. 8, 2016, 10:30 p.m. UTC | #4
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 03:25:27PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> What tree would you prefer?  I vote for the IRQ tree since that seems
> to be where the interesting parts are, and I think I acked all the PCI
> bits.

Yes, that would be my preference to.

> 
> > + * struct irq_affinity - Description for auto irq affinity assignements
> > + * @pre_vectors:	Reserved vectors at the beginning of the MSIX
> > + *			vector space
> > + * @post_vectors:	Reserved vectors at the end of the MSIX
> > + *			vector space
> 
> Maybe include something more informative than just "reserved", e.g.,
> "Don't apply affinity to @pre_vectors at beginning of MSI-X vector
> space" or "Vectors at beginning of MSI-X vector space that are exempt
> from affinity"?

Sure.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/include/linux/interrupt.h b/include/linux/interrupt.h
index 72f0721..7284bcd 100644
--- a/include/linux/interrupt.h
+++ b/include/linux/interrupt.h
@@ -232,6 +232,18 @@  struct irq_affinity_notify {
 	void (*release)(struct kref *ref);
 };
 
+/**
+ * struct irq_affinity - Description for auto irq affinity assignements
+ * @pre_vectors:	Reserved vectors at the beginning of the MSIX
+ *			vector space
+ * @post_vectors:	Reserved vectors at the end of the MSIX
+ *			vector space
+ */
+struct irq_affinity {
+	int	pre_vectors;
+	int	post_vectors;
+};
+
 #if defined(CONFIG_SMP)
 
 extern cpumask_var_t irq_default_affinity;