blk-bwt: fix old-style function declaration
diff mbox

Message ID 20161116153007.3543720-1-arnd@arndb.de
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Arnd Bergmann Nov. 16, 2016, 3:29 p.m. UTC
The newly added driver causes a harmless warning in some configurations:

block/blk-wbt.c:250:1: error: ‘inline’ is not at beginning of declaration [-Werror=old-style-declaration]
 static bool inline stat_sample_valid(struct blk_rq_stat *stat)

This makes it use the expected format for the declaration.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 block/blk-wbt.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Jens Axboe Nov. 16, 2016, 3:33 p.m. UTC | #1
On 11/16/2016 08:29 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The newly added driver causes a harmless warning in some configurations:
>
> block/blk-wbt.c:250:1: error: ‘inline’ is not at beginning of declaration [-Werror=old-style-declaration]
>  static bool inline stat_sample_valid(struct blk_rq_stat *stat)
>
> This makes it use the expected format for the declaration.

Thanks Arnd, applied with the subject typo fixed up.

Patch
diff mbox

diff --git a/block/blk-wbt.c b/block/blk-wbt.c
index 20712f0db6ea..9f97594e68ce 100644
--- a/block/blk-wbt.c
+++ b/block/blk-wbt.c
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@  static bool calc_wb_limits(struct rq_wb *rwb)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static bool inline stat_sample_valid(struct blk_rq_stat *stat)
+static inline bool stat_sample_valid(struct blk_rq_stat *stat)
 {
 	/*
 	 * We need at least one read sample, and a minimum of