diff mbox

[2/3] thermal: rockchip: improve conversion error messages

Message ID 1479513177-81504-2-git-send-email-briannorris@chromium.org (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Brian Norris Nov. 18, 2016, 11:52 p.m. UTC
These error messages don't give much information about what went wrong.
It would be nice, for one, to see what invalid temperature was being
requested when conversion fails. It's also good to return an error when
we can't handle a conversion properly.

While we're at it, fix the grammar too.

Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
---
Note: it'd probably be even nicer to know which sensor this was, but we've
kinda abstracted that one away by this point...

 drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Caesar Wang Nov. 19, 2016, 3:31 a.m. UTC | #1
Brian,

在 2016年11月19日 07:52, Brian Norris 写道:
> These error messages don't give much information about what went wrong.
> It would be nice, for one, to see what invalid temperature was being
> requested when conversion fails. It's also good to return an error when
> we can't handle a conversion properly.
>
> While we're at it, fix the grammar too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
> ---
> Note: it'd probably be even nicer to know which sensor this was, but we've
> kinda abstracted that one away by this point...
>
>   drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c | 7 +++++--
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
> index e227a9f0acf7..35554d146b9d 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
> @@ -424,7 +424,8 @@ static u32 rk_tsadcv2_temp_to_code(struct chip_tsadc_table table,
>   	}
>   
>   exit:
> -	pr_err("Invalid the conversion, error=%d\n", error);
> +	pr_err("%s: invalid temperature, temp=%d error=%d\n",
> +		__func__, temp, error);

I have do some similar for rockchip inside thermal driver.  Forget to 
send for upstream. :(
exit:
     pr_err("%s: Invalid conversion table: code=%d, temperature=%d\n",
            __func__, error, temp);

>   	return error;
>   }
>   
> @@ -475,7 +476,9 @@ static int rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(struct chip_tsadc_table table, u32 code,
>   		}
>   		break;
>   	default:
> -		pr_err("Invalid the conversion table\n");
> +		pr_err("%s: invalid conversion table, mode=%d\n",
> +			__func__, table.mode);
> +		return -EINVAL;
>   	}
>   
>   	/*
Caesar Wang Nov. 19, 2016, 3:35 a.m. UTC | #2
在 2016年11月19日 11:31, Caesar Wang 写道:
> Brian,
>
> 在 2016年11月19日 07:52, Brian Norris 写道:
>> These error messages don't give much information about what went wrong.
>> It would be nice, for one, to see what invalid temperature was being
>> requested when conversion fails. It's also good to return an error when
>> we can't handle a conversion properly.
>>
>> While we're at it, fix the grammar too.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Caesar Wang@rock-chips.com

Thanks the fixes.

-Caesar
>> ---
>> Note: it'd probably be even nicer to know which sensor this was, but 
>> we've
>> kinda abstracted that one away by this point...
>>
>>   drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c | 7 +++++--
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c 
>> b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
>> index e227a9f0acf7..35554d146b9d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
>> @@ -424,7 +424,8 @@ static u32 rk_tsadcv2_temp_to_code(struct 
>> chip_tsadc_table table,
>>       }
>>     exit:
>> -    pr_err("Invalid the conversion, error=%d\n", error);
>> +    pr_err("%s: invalid temperature, temp=%d error=%d\n",
>> +        __func__, temp, error);
>
> I have do some similar for rockchip inside thermal driver.  Forget to 
> send for upstream. :(
> exit:
>     pr_err("%s: Invalid conversion table: code=%d, temperature=%d\n",
>            __func__, error, temp);
>
>>       return error;
>>   }
>>   @@ -475,7 +476,9 @@ static int rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(struct 
>> chip_tsadc_table table, u32 code,
>>           }
>>           break;
>>       default:
>> -        pr_err("Invalid the conversion table\n");
>> +        pr_err("%s: invalid conversion table, mode=%d\n",
>> +            __func__, table.mode);
>> +        return -EINVAL;
>>       }
>>         /*
>
Caesar Wang Nov. 22, 2016, 1:51 a.m. UTC | #3
在 2016年11月19日 11:31, Caesar Wang 写道:
> Brian,
>
> 在 2016年11月19日 07:52, Brian Norris 写道:
>> These error messages don't give much information about what went wrong.
>> It would be nice, for one, to see what invalid temperature was being
>> requested when conversion fails. It's also good to return an error when
>> we can't handle a conversion properly.
>>
>> While we're at it, fix the grammar too.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
>> ---
>> Note: it'd probably be even nicer to know which sensor this was, but 
>> we've
>> kinda abstracted that one away by this point...
>>
>>   drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c | 7 +++++--
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c 
>> b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
>> index e227a9f0acf7..35554d146b9d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
>> @@ -424,7 +424,8 @@ static u32 rk_tsadcv2_temp_to_code(struct 
>> chip_tsadc_table table,
>>       }
>>     exit:
>> -    pr_err("Invalid the conversion, error=%d\n", error);
>> +    pr_err("%s: invalid temperature, temp=%d error=%d\n",
>> +        __func__, temp, error);
>
> I have do some similar for rockchip inside thermal driver.  Forget to 
> send for upstream. :(
> exit:
>     pr_err("%s: Invalid conversion table: code=%d, temperature=%d\n",
>            __func__, error, temp);
>
>>       return error;
>>   }
>>   @@ -475,7 +476,9 @@ static int rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(struct 
>> chip_tsadc_table table, u32 code,
>>           }
>>           break;
>>       default:
>> -        pr_err("Invalid the conversion table\n");
>> +        pr_err("%s: invalid conversion table, mode=%d\n",
>> +            __func__, table.mode);
>> +        return -EINVAL;

CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
#428: FILE: drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c:428:
+    pr_err("%s: invalid temperature, temp=%d error=%d\n",
+        __func__, temp, error);

CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
#480: FILE: drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c:480:
+        pr_err("%s: invalid conversion table, mode=%d\n",
+            __func__, table->mode);


I'm ready to resend all rockchip thermal patches. (contain them)

>>       }
>>         /*
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-rockchip mailing list
> Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
Brian Norris Nov. 22, 2016, 2:15 a.m. UTC | #4
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 09:51:23AM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:
> CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
> #428: FILE: drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c:428:
> +    pr_err("%s: invalid temperature, temp=%d error=%d\n",
> +        __func__, temp, error);
> 
> CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
> #480: FILE: drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c:480:
> +        pr_err("%s: invalid conversion table, mode=%d\n",
> +            __func__, table->mode);

What patch are you checking? I ran mine through checkpatch, and there
are no problems. Did you perhaps mangle the tabs into spaces when you
saved the patch?

> I'm ready to resend all rockchip thermal patches. (contain them)

I see no reason to resend so far; the only criticism was on the 1st
patch (a non-critical patch to the core thermal code; the others are
relatively independent, as long as you don't care that I'm adding
another error return without fixing up the broken
CONFIG_THERMAL_EMULATION support).

Brian
Caesar Wang Nov. 22, 2016, 2:33 a.m. UTC | #5
在 2016年11月22日 10:15, Brian Norris 写道:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 09:51:23AM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:
>> CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
>> #428: FILE: drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c:428:
>> +    pr_err("%s: invalid temperature, temp=%d error=%d\n",
>> +        __func__, temp, error);
>>
>> CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
>> #480: FILE: drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c:480:
>> +        pr_err("%s: invalid conversion table, mode=%d\n",
>> +            __func__, table->mode);
> What patch are you checking? I ran mine through checkpatch, and there
> are no problems.

That  just checkcode on Chromeos kernelv4.4,  that trivial things :)
$chromiumos/src/third_party/kernel/v4.4$ checkcode 
drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
#428: FILE: drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c:428:
+    pr_err("%s: invalid temperature, temp=%d error=%d\n",
+        __func__, temp, error);
...

vi drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c +428 or  vi 
drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c +480,

> Did you perhaps mangle the tabs into spaces when you
> saved the patch?
>
>> I'm ready to resend all rockchip thermal patches. (contain them)
> I see no reason to resend so far; the only criticism was on the 1st
> patch (a non-critical patch to the core thermal code; the others are
> relatively independent, as long as you don't care that I'm adding
> another error return without fixing up the broken
> CONFIG_THERMAL_EMULATION support).
>
> Brian
>
Brian Norris Nov. 22, 2016, 3:43 a.m. UTC | #6
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:33:27AM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:
> 在 2016年11月22日 10:15, Brian Norris 写道:
> >On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 09:51:23AM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:
> >>CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
> >>#428: FILE: drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c:428:
> >>+    pr_err("%s: invalid temperature, temp=%d error=%d\n",
> >>+        __func__, temp, error);
> >>
> >>CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
> >>#480: FILE: drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c:480:
> >>+        pr_err("%s: invalid conversion table, mode=%d\n",
> >>+            __func__, table->mode);
> >What patch are you checking? I ran mine through checkpatch, and there
> >are no problems.
> 
> That  just checkcode on Chromeos kernelv4.4,  that trivial things :)
> $chromiumos/src/third_party/kernel/v4.4$ checkcode

I'm not familiar with that tool, and that repository isn't upstream
but...

> drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
> CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
> #428: FILE: drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c:428:
> +    pr_err("%s: invalid temperature, temp=%d error=%d\n",
> +        __func__, temp, error);

...on approximately my 10th read of this...I guess maybe this tool has
determined that 2 tabs is 1 character too much, because the second line
lines up with the '%' instead of the '"'. If this is so important to
you, you can of course edit my patch and include it with yours.

Regards,
Brian
Zhang, Rui Nov. 22, 2016, 7:57 a.m. UTC | #7
On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 09:51 +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:
> 在 2016年11月19日 11:31, Caesar Wang 写道:
> > 
> > Brian,
> > 
> > 在 2016年11月19日 07:52, Brian Norris 写道:
> > > 
> > > These error messages don't give much information about what went
> > > wrong.
> > > It would be nice, for one, to see what invalid temperature was
> > > being
> > > requested when conversion fails. It's also good to return an
> > > error when
> > > we can't handle a conversion properly.
> > > 
> > > While we're at it, fix the grammar too.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
> > > ---
> > > Note: it'd probably be even nicer to know which sensor this was,
> > > but 
> > > we've
> > > kinda abstracted that one away by this point...
> > > 
> > >   drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c | 7 +++++--
> > >   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c 
> > > b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
> > > index e227a9f0acf7..35554d146b9d 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
> > > @@ -424,7 +424,8 @@ static u32 rk_tsadcv2_temp_to_code(struct 
> > > chip_tsadc_table table,
> > >       }
> > >     exit:
> > > -    pr_err("Invalid the conversion, error=%d\n", error);
> > > +    pr_err("%s: invalid temperature, temp=%d error=%d\n",
> > > +        __func__, temp, error);
> > I have do some similar for rockchip inside thermal driver.  Forget
> > to 
> > send for upstream. :(
> > exit:
> >     pr_err("%s: Invalid conversion table: code=%d,
> > temperature=%d\n",
> >            __func__, error, temp);
> > 
> > > 
> > >       return error;
> > >   }
> > >   @@ -475,7 +476,9 @@ static int rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(struct 
> > > chip_tsadc_table table, u32 code,
> > >           }
> > >           break;
> > >       default:
> > > -        pr_err("Invalid the conversion table\n");
> > > +        pr_err("%s: invalid conversion table, mode=%d\n",
> > > +            __func__, table.mode);
> > > +        return -EINVAL;
> CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
> #428: FILE: drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c:428:
> +    pr_err("%s: invalid temperature, temp=%d error=%d\n",
> +        __func__, temp, error);
> 
> CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
> #480: FILE: drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c:480:
> +        pr_err("%s: invalid conversion table, mode=%d\n",
> +            __func__, table->mode);
> 
> 
> I'm ready to resend all rockchip thermal patches. (contain them)
> 
so I will ignore patch 2/3 and 3/3 for now and wait for your new patch
set.

thanks,
rui
> > 
> > > 
> > >       }
> > >         /*
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-rockchip mailing list
> > Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
Caesar Wang Nov. 22, 2016, 12:44 p.m. UTC | #8
在 2016年11月22日 15:57, Zhang Rui 写道:
> On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 09:51 +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:
>> 在 2016年11月19日 11:31, Caesar Wang 写道:
>>> Brian,
>>>
>>> 在 2016年11月19日 07:52, Brian Norris 写道:
>>>> These error messages don't give much information about what went
>>>> wrong.
>>>> It would be nice, for one, to see what invalid temperature was
>>>> being
>>>> requested when conversion fails. It's also good to return an
>>>> error when
>>>> we can't handle a conversion properly.
>>>>
>>>> While we're at it, fix the grammar too.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> Note: it'd probably be even nicer to know which sensor this was,
>>>> but
>>>> we've
>>>> kinda abstracted that one away by this point...
>>>>
>>>>    drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c | 7 +++++--
>>>>    1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
>>>> b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
>>>> index e227a9f0acf7..35554d146b9d 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
>>>> @@ -424,7 +424,8 @@ static u32 rk_tsadcv2_temp_to_code(struct
>>>> chip_tsadc_table table,
>>>>        }
>>>>      exit:
>>>> -    pr_err("Invalid the conversion, error=%d\n", error);
>>>> +    pr_err("%s: invalid temperature, temp=%d error=%d\n",
>>>> +        __func__, temp, error);
>>> I have do some similar for rockchip inside thermal driver.  Forget
>>> to
>>> send for upstream. :(
>>> exit:
>>>      pr_err("%s: Invalid conversion table: code=%d,
>>> temperature=%d\n",
>>>             __func__, error, temp);
>>>
>>>>        return error;
>>>>    }
>>>>    @@ -475,7 +476,9 @@ static int rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(struct
>>>> chip_tsadc_table table, u32 code,
>>>>            }
>>>>            break;
>>>>        default:
>>>> -        pr_err("Invalid the conversion table\n");
>>>> +        pr_err("%s: invalid conversion table, mode=%d\n",
>>>> +            __func__, table.mode);
>>>> +        return -EINVAL;
>> CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
>> #428: FILE: drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c:428:
>> +    pr_err("%s: invalid temperature, temp=%d error=%d\n",
>> +        __func__, temp, error);
>>
>> CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
>> #480: FILE: drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c:480:
>> +        pr_err("%s: invalid conversion table, mode=%d\n",
>> +            __func__, table->mode);
>>
>>
>> I'm ready to resend all rockchip thermal patches. (contain them)
>>
> so I will ignore patch 2/3 and 3/3 for now and wait for your new patch
> set.

Posted the patch set on https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/11/22/250

>
> thanks,
> rui
>>>>        }
>>>>          /*
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Linux-rockchip mailing list
>>> Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-rockchip mailing list
> Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
index e227a9f0acf7..35554d146b9d 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
@@ -424,7 +424,8 @@  static u32 rk_tsadcv2_temp_to_code(struct chip_tsadc_table table,
 	}
 
 exit:
-	pr_err("Invalid the conversion, error=%d\n", error);
+	pr_err("%s: invalid temperature, temp=%d error=%d\n",
+		__func__, temp, error);
 	return error;
 }
 
@@ -475,7 +476,9 @@  static int rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(struct chip_tsadc_table table, u32 code,
 		}
 		break;
 	default:
-		pr_err("Invalid the conversion table\n");
+		pr_err("%s: invalid conversion table, mode=%d\n",
+			__func__, table.mode);
+		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
 	/*