| Message ID | 32910821-8b16-1107-20de-b34d029b3e9a@oracle.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
From: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@oracle.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 13:25:00 -0600 > If the last section of a core file ends with an unmapped or zero page, > the size of the file does not correspond with the last dump_skip() call. > gdb complains that the file is truncated and can be confusing to users. > > After all of the vma sections are written, make sure that the file size > is no smaller than the current file position. > > This problem can be demonstrated with gdb's bigcore testcase on the > sparc architecture. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@oracle.com> The lseek() done by dump_skip() should extend the file properly. Otherwise, everyone would be seeing this problem. That test case passed all the time when I was last running the GDB testsuite all the time on sparc64, say 5 years ago. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:42:43PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> The lseek() done by dump_skip() should extend the file properly.
lseek never extends a file. It just moves the current file position.
So if you do not have a write after the lseek it does nothing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 23:55:21 -0800 > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:42:43PM -0500, David Miller wrote: >> The lseek() done by dump_skip() should extend the file properly. > > lseek never extends a file. It just moves the current file position. > So if you do not have a write after the lseek it does nothing. Ok, then the only other feedback I have is that we should probably defer this truncate() call until the last possible dump write occurs rather than right after the VMA loop. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 01/17/2017 02:44 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> > Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 23:55:21 -0800 > >> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:42:43PM -0500, David Miller wrote: >>> The lseek() done by dump_skip() should extend the file properly. >> >> lseek never extends a file. It just moves the current file position. >> So if you do not have a write after the lseek it does nothing. > > Ok, then the only other feedback I have is that we should probably > defer this truncate() call until the last possible dump write occurs > rather than right after the VMA loop. Yeah. That's fine with me. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/fs/binfmt_elf.c b/fs/binfmt_elf.c index 29a02daf08a9..422370293cfd 100644 --- a/fs/binfmt_elf.c +++ b/fs/binfmt_elf.c @@ -2298,6 +2298,7 @@ static int elf_core_dump(struct coredump_params *cprm) goto end_coredump; } } + dump_truncate(cprm); if (!elf_core_write_extra_data(cprm)) goto end_coredump; diff --git a/fs/coredump.c b/fs/coredump.c index e525b6017cdf..ae6b05629ca1 100644 --- a/fs/coredump.c +++ b/fs/coredump.c @@ -833,3 +833,21 @@ int dump_align(struct coredump_params *cprm, int align) return mod ? dump_skip(cprm, align - mod) : 1; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(dump_align); + +/* + * Ensures that file size is big enough to contain the current file + * postion. This prevents gdb from complaining about a truncated file + * if the last "write" to the file was dump_skip. + */ +void dump_truncate(struct coredump_params *cprm) +{ + struct file *file = cprm->file; + loff_t offset; + + if (file->f_op->llseek && file->f_op->llseek != no_llseek) { + offset = file->f_op->llseek(file, 0, SEEK_CUR); + if (i_size_read(file->f_mapping->host) < offset) + do_truncate(file->f_path.dentry, offset, 0, file); + } +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dump_truncate); diff --git a/include/linux/coredump.h b/include/linux/coredump.h index d016a121a8c4..28ffa94aed6b 100644 --- a/include/linux/coredump.h +++ b/include/linux/coredump.h @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ struct coredump_params; extern int dump_skip(struct coredump_params *cprm, size_t nr); extern int dump_emit(struct coredump_params *cprm, const void *addr, int nr); extern int dump_align(struct coredump_params *cprm, int align); +extern void dump_truncate(struct coredump_params *cprm); #ifdef CONFIG_COREDUMP extern void do_coredump(const siginfo_t *siginfo); #else
If the last section of a core file ends with an unmapped or zero page, the size of the file does not correspond with the last dump_skip() call. gdb complains that the file is truncated and can be confusing to users. After all of the vma sections are written, make sure that the file size is no smaller than the current file position. This problem can be demonstrated with gdb's bigcore testcase on the sparc architecture. Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@oracle.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --- fs/binfmt_elf.c | 1 + fs/coredump.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/coredump.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+)