| Message ID | 1484879660-1960-3-git-send-email-agustinv@codeaurora.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 09:34:19PM -0500, Agustin Vega-Frias wrote: > ACPI extended IRQ resources may contain a ResourceSource to specify > an alternate interrupt controller. Introduce acpi_irq_get and use it > to implement ResourceSource/IRQ domain mapping. > > The new API is similar to of_irq_get and allows re-initialization > of a platform resource from the ACPI extended IRQ resource, and > provides proper behavior for probe deferral when the domain is not > yet present when called. > > Signed-off-by: Agustin Vega-Frias <agustinv@codeaurora.org> > --- > drivers/acpi/Makefile | 2 +- > drivers/acpi/{gsi.c => irq.c} | 221 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/base/platform.c | 8 ++ > include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h | 1 + > include/linux/acpi.h | 15 +++ > 5 files changed, 246 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > rename drivers/acpi/{gsi.c => irq.c} (28%) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Makefile b/drivers/acpi/Makefile > index 9ed0878..a391bbc 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/acpi/Makefile > @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ acpi-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS) += debugfs.o > acpi-$(CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA) += numa.o > acpi-$(CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER) += cm_sbs.o > acpi-y += acpi_lpat.o > -acpi-$(CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_GSI) += gsi.o > +acpi-$(CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_GSI) += irq.o > acpi-$(CONFIG_ACPI_WATCHDOG) += acpi_watchdog.o > > # These are (potentially) separate modules > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/gsi.c b/drivers/acpi/irq.c > similarity index 28% > rename from drivers/acpi/gsi.c > rename to drivers/acpi/irq.c > index ee9e0f2..db4ee4c 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/gsi.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/irq.c > @@ -85,6 +85,227 @@ void acpi_unregister_gsi(u32 gsi) > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_unregister_gsi); > > /** > + * acpi_get_irq_source_fwhandle() - Retrieve fwhandle from IRQ resource source. > + * @source: acpi_resource_source to use for the lookup. > + * > + * Description: > + * Retrieve the fwhandle of the device referenced by the given IRQ resource > + * source. In addition to it being a valid ACPI device, its _HID must be > + * listed on the probe table of ACPI DSDT irqchips. The check is used to > + * determine if a driver for the referenced device is available and decide > + * if we should try deferred probing if the device has not been probed yet. > + * Drivers must use the __dsdt_irqchip attribute when declaring the table > + * of acpi_device_ids for the device, e.g.: > + * > + * static const struct acpi_device_id my_device_ids[] __dsdt_irqchip = { > + * { "ABCD0123", }, > + * { } > + * }; > + * Ok, thanks for doing that. In my opinion it should be done by reusing the ACPI_DECLARE_PROBE_ENTRY mechanism by simply adding a flag to detect whether the entry refers to a static table or AML and a corresponding acpi_device_id for the matching. This driver matching mechanism though is just an optimization, the IRQ deferral mechanism you are putting in place is much more important, so for now let's focus on getting code in v10 (plus all cosmetic "fixes" introduced in this patch minus the linker section) agreed upon and upstream, adding this linker section later is not a big deal IMO, it must not slow you down. So, no need for reposting anything let's focus on the IRQ probe deferral core functionality and get it merged. Thanks, Lorenzo > + * Return: > + * The referenced device fwhandle or NULL on failure > + */ > +static struct fwnode_handle * > +acpi_get_irq_source_fwhandle(const struct acpi_resource_source *source) > +{ > + struct fwnode_handle *result = NULL; > + struct acpi_device *device; > + struct acpi_hardware_id *hwid; > + struct acpi_device_id *devid; > + acpi_handle handle; > + acpi_status status; > + > + if (!source->string_length) > + return acpi_gsi_domain_id; > + > + status = acpi_get_handle(NULL, source->string_ptr, &handle); > + if (WARN_ON(ACPI_FAILURE(status))) > + return NULL; > + > + device = acpi_bus_get_acpi_device(handle); > + if (WARN_ON(!device)) > + return NULL; > + > + list_for_each_entry(hwid, &device->pnp.ids, list) { > + for (devid = &__dsdt_irqchip_acpi_probe_table; > + devid < &__dsdt_irqchip_acpi_probe_table_end; devid++) { > + if (devid->id && !strcmp(devid->id, hwid->id)) { > + result = &device->fwnode; > + break; > + } > + } > + } > + > + acpi_bus_put_acpi_device(device); > + > + return result; > +} > + > +/* > + * Context for the resource walk used to lookup IRQ resources. > + * Contains a return code, the lookup index, and references to the flags > + * and fwspec where the result is returned. > + */ > +struct acpi_irq_parse_one_ctx { > + int rc; > + unsigned int index; > + unsigned long *res_flags; > + struct irq_fwspec *fwspec; > +}; > + > +/** > + * acpi_irq_parse_one_match - Handle a matching IRQ resource. > + * @fwnode: matching fwnode > + * @hwirq: hardware IRQ number > + * @triggering: triggering attributes of hwirq > + * @polarity: polarity attributes of hwirq > + * @polarity: polarity attributes of hwirq > + * @shareable: shareable attributes of hwirq > + * @ctx: acpi_irq_parse_one_ctx updated by this function > + * > + * Description: > + * Handle a matching IRQ resource by populating the given ctx with > + * the information passed. > + */ > +static inline void acpi_irq_parse_one_match(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, > + u32 hwirq, u8 triggering, > + u8 polarity, u8 shareable, > + struct acpi_irq_parse_one_ctx *ctx) > +{ > + if (!fwnode) > + return; > + ctx->rc = 0; > + *ctx->res_flags = acpi_dev_irq_flags(triggering, polarity, shareable); > + ctx->fwspec->fwnode = fwnode; > + ctx->fwspec->param[0] = hwirq; > + ctx->fwspec->param[1] = acpi_dev_get_irq_type(triggering, polarity); > + ctx->fwspec->param_count = 2; > +} > + > +/** > + * acpi_irq_parse_one_cb - Handle the given resource. > + * @ares: resource to handle > + * @context: context for the walk > + * > + * Description: > + * This is called by acpi_walk_resources passing each resource returned by > + * the _CRS method. We only inspect IRQ resources. Since IRQ resources > + * might contain multiple interrupts we check if the index is within this > + * one's interrupt array, otherwise we subtract the current resource IRQ > + * count from the lookup index to prepare for the next resource. > + * Once a match is found we call acpi_irq_parse_one_match to populate > + * the result and end the walk by returning AE_CTRL_TERMINATE. > + * > + * Return: > + * AE_OK if the walk should continue, AE_CTRL_TERMINATE if a matching > + * IRQ resource was found. > + */ > +static acpi_status acpi_irq_parse_one_cb(struct acpi_resource *ares, > + void *context) > +{ > + struct acpi_irq_parse_one_ctx *ctx = context; > + struct acpi_resource_irq *irq; > + struct acpi_resource_extended_irq *eirq; > + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode; > + > + switch (ares->type) { > + case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_IRQ: > + irq = &ares->data.irq; > + if (ctx->index >= irq->interrupt_count) { > + ctx->index -= irq->interrupt_count; > + return AE_OK; > + } > + fwnode = acpi_gsi_domain_id; > + acpi_irq_parse_one_match(fwnode, irq->interrupts[ctx->index], > + irq->triggering, irq->polarity, > + irq->sharable, ctx); > + return AE_CTRL_TERMINATE; > + case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_EXTENDED_IRQ: > + eirq = &ares->data.extended_irq; > + if (eirq->producer_consumer == ACPI_PRODUCER) > + return AE_OK; > + if (ctx->index >= eirq->interrupt_count) { > + ctx->index -= eirq->interrupt_count; > + return AE_OK; > + } > + fwnode = acpi_get_irq_source_fwhandle(&eirq->resource_source); > + acpi_irq_parse_one_match(fwnode, eirq->interrupts[ctx->index], > + eirq->triggering, eirq->polarity, > + eirq->sharable, ctx); > + return AE_CTRL_TERMINATE; > + } > + > + return AE_OK; > +} > + > +/** > + * acpi_irq_parse_one - Resolve an interrupt for a device > + * @handle: the device whose interrupt is to be resolved > + * @index: index of the interrupt to resolve > + * @fwspec: structure irq_fwspec filled by this function > + * @flags: resource flags filled by this function > + * > + * Description: > + * Resolves an interrupt for a device by walking its CRS resources to find > + * the appropriate ACPI IRQ resource and populating the given struct irq_fwspec > + * and flags. > + * > + * Return: > + * The result stored in ctx.rc by the callback, or the default -EINVAL value > + * if an error occurs. > + */ > +static int acpi_irq_parse_one(acpi_handle handle, unsigned int index, > + struct irq_fwspec *fwspec, unsigned long *flags) > +{ > + struct acpi_irq_parse_one_ctx ctx = { -EINVAL, index, flags, fwspec }; > + > + acpi_walk_resources(handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS, acpi_irq_parse_one_cb, &ctx); > + return ctx.rc; > +} > + > +/** > + * acpi_irq_get - Lookup an ACPI IRQ resource and use it to initialize resource. > + * @handle: ACPI device handle > + * @index: ACPI IRQ resource index to lookup > + * @res: Linux IRQ resource to initialize > + * > + * Description: > + * Look for the ACPI IRQ resource with the given index and use it to initialize > + * the given Linux IRQ resource. > + * > + * Return: > + * 0 on success > + * -EINVAL if an error occurs > + * -EPROBE_DEFER if the IRQ lookup/conversion failed > + */ > +int acpi_irq_get(acpi_handle handle, unsigned int index, struct resource *res) > +{ > + struct irq_fwspec fwspec; > + struct irq_domain *domain; > + unsigned long flags; > + int rc; > + > + rc = acpi_irq_parse_one(handle, index, &fwspec, &flags); > + if (rc) > + return rc; > + > + domain = irq_find_matching_fwnode(fwspec.fwnode, DOMAIN_BUS_ANY); > + if (!domain) > + return -EPROBE_DEFER; > + > + rc = irq_create_fwspec_mapping(&fwspec); > + if (rc <= 0) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + res->start = rc; > + res->end = rc; > + res->flags = flags; > + > + return 0; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_irq_get); > + > +/** > * acpi_set_irq_model - Setup the GSI irqdomain information > * @model: the value assigned to acpi_irq_model > * @fwnode: the irq_domain identifier for mapping and looking up > diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c > index c4af003..040d474 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/platform.c > +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c > @@ -102,6 +102,14 @@ int platform_get_irq(struct platform_device *dev, unsigned int num) > } > > r = platform_get_resource(dev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, num); > + if (r && r->flags & IORESOURCE_DISABLED && has_acpi_companion(&dev->dev)) { > + int ret; > + > + ret = acpi_irq_get(ACPI_HANDLE(&dev->dev), num, r); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + } > + > /* > * The resources may pass trigger flags to the irqs that need > * to be set up. It so happens that the trigger flags for > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h > index 0968d13..0763c8a 100644 > --- a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h > +++ b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h > @@ -567,6 +567,7 @@ > ACPI_PROBE_TABLE(irqchip) \ > ACPI_PROBE_TABLE(clksrc) \ > ACPI_PROBE_TABLE(iort) \ > + ACPI_PROBE_TABLE(dsdt_irqchip) \ > EARLYCON_TABLE() > > #define INIT_TEXT \ > diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h > index 5b36974..15fac1a 100644 > --- a/include/linux/acpi.h > +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h > @@ -1056,6 +1056,11 @@ struct acpi_probe_entry { > (&ACPI_PROBE_TABLE_END(t) - \ > &ACPI_PROBE_TABLE(t))); \ > }) > + > +#define __dsdt_irqchip __section(__dsdt_irqchip_acpi_probe_table) > +extern struct acpi_device_id __dsdt_irqchip_acpi_probe_table; > +extern struct acpi_device_id __dsdt_irqchip_acpi_probe_table_end; > + > #else > static inline int acpi_dev_get_property(struct acpi_device *adev, > const char *name, acpi_object_type type, > @@ -1153,4 +1158,14 @@ static inline void acpi_table_upgrade(void) { } > static inline int parse_spcr(bool earlycon) { return 0; } > #endif > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_GSI > +int acpi_irq_get(acpi_handle handle, unsigned int index, struct resource *res); > +#else > +static inline int acpi_irq_get(acpi_handle handle, unsigned int index, > + struct resource *res) > +{ > + return -EINVAL; > +} > +#endif > + > #endif /*_LINUX_ACPI_H*/ > -- > Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. on behalf of the Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. > Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 4:34 AM, Agustin Vega-Frias <agustinv@codeaurora.org> wrote: > ACPI extended IRQ resources may contain a ResourceSource to specify > an alternate interrupt controller. Introduce acpi_irq_get and use it > to implement ResourceSource/IRQ domain mapping. > > The new API is similar to of_irq_get and allows re-initialization > of a platform resource from the ACPI extended IRQ resource, and > provides proper behavior for probe deferral when the domain is not > yet present when called. > +static struct fwnode_handle * > +acpi_get_irq_source_fwhandle(const struct acpi_resource_source *source) > +{ > + struct fwnode_handle *result = NULL; > + struct acpi_device *device; > + struct acpi_hardware_id *hwid; > + struct acpi_device_id *devid; > + acpi_handle handle; > + acpi_status status; > + > + if (!source->string_length) > + return acpi_gsi_domain_id; > + > + status = acpi_get_handle(NULL, source->string_ptr, &handle); > + if (WARN_ON(ACPI_FAILURE(status))) > + return NULL; > + > + device = acpi_bus_get_acpi_device(handle); > + if (WARN_ON(!device)) > + return NULL; > + > + list_for_each_entry(hwid, &device->pnp.ids, list) { > + for (devid = &__dsdt_irqchip_acpi_probe_table; > + devid < &__dsdt_irqchip_acpi_probe_table_end; devid++) { > + if (devid->id && !strcmp(devid->id, hwid->id)) { > + result = &device->fwnode; > + break; > + } > + } Looks like a candidate for linker table API. (I recommend to Cc Luis for this part) > + } > +/** > + * acpi_irq_parse_one_match - Handle a matching IRQ resource. > + * @fwnode: matching fwnode > + * @hwirq: hardware IRQ number > + * @triggering: triggering attributes of hwirq > + * @polarity: polarity attributes of hwirq > + * @polarity: polarity attributes of hwirq > + * @shareable: shareable attributes of hwirq > + * @ctx: acpi_irq_parse_one_ctx updated by this function > + * > + * Description: > + * Handle a matching IRQ resource by populating the given ctx with > + * the information passed. > + */ > +static inline void acpi_irq_parse_one_match(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, > + u32 hwirq, u8 triggering, > + u8 polarity, u8 shareable, > + struct acpi_irq_parse_one_ctx *ctx) > +{ > + if (!fwnode) > + return; > + ctx->rc = 0; Perhaps ctx->rc = fwnode ? 0 : -EINVAL; ? > + *ctx->res_flags = acpi_dev_irq_flags(triggering, polarity, shareable); > + ctx->fwspec->fwnode = fwnode; > + ctx->fwspec->param[0] = hwirq; > + ctx->fwspec->param[1] = acpi_dev_get_irq_type(triggering, polarity); > + ctx->fwspec->param_count = 2; > +} > +int acpi_irq_get(acpi_handle handle, unsigned int index, struct resource *res) > +{ > + struct irq_fwspec fwspec; > + struct irq_domain *domain; > + unsigned long flags; > + int rc; > + > + rc = acpi_irq_parse_one(handle, index, &fwspec, &flags); > + if (rc) > + return rc; > + > + domain = irq_find_matching_fwnode(fwspec.fwnode, DOMAIN_BUS_ANY); > + if (!domain) > + return -EPROBE_DEFER; > + > + rc = irq_create_fwspec_mapping(&fwspec); > + if (rc <= 0) Is rc = 0 an error? > + return -EINVAL; > + > + res->start = rc; > + res->end = rc; > + res->flags = flags; > + > + return 0; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_irq_get); > --- a/drivers/base/platform.c > +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c > @@ -102,6 +102,14 @@ int platform_get_irq(struct platform_device *dev, unsigned int num) > r = platform_get_resource(dev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, num); > + if (r && r->flags & IORESOURCE_DISABLED && has_acpi_companion(&dev->dev)) { > + int ret; > + > + ret = acpi_irq_get(ACPI_HANDLE(&dev->dev), num, r); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + } > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_GSI #if IS_ENABLED() > +int acpi_irq_get(acpi_handle handle, unsigned int index, struct resource *res); > +#else > +static inline int acpi_irq_get(acpi_handle handle, unsigned int index, > + struct resource *res) Perhaps static inline int ... > +{ > + return -EINVAL; > +} > +#endif
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 03:01:18AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 4:34 AM, Agustin Vega-Frias > <agustinv@codeaurora.org> wrote: > > ACPI extended IRQ resources may contain a ResourceSource to specify > > an alternate interrupt controller. Introduce acpi_irq_get and use it > > to implement ResourceSource/IRQ domain mapping. > > > > The new API is similar to of_irq_get and allows re-initialization > > of a platform resource from the ACPI extended IRQ resource, and > > provides proper behavior for probe deferral when the domain is not > > yet present when called. > > > +static struct fwnode_handle * > > +acpi_get_irq_source_fwhandle(const struct acpi_resource_source *source) > > +{ > > + struct fwnode_handle *result = NULL; > > + struct acpi_device *device; > > + struct acpi_hardware_id *hwid; > > + struct acpi_device_id *devid; > > + acpi_handle handle; > > + acpi_status status; > > + > > + if (!source->string_length) > > + return acpi_gsi_domain_id; > > + > > + status = acpi_get_handle(NULL, source->string_ptr, &handle); > > + if (WARN_ON(ACPI_FAILURE(status))) > > + return NULL; > > + > > + device = acpi_bus_get_acpi_device(handle); > > + if (WARN_ON(!device)) > > + return NULL; > > + > > > + list_for_each_entry(hwid, &device->pnp.ids, list) { > > > + for (devid = &__dsdt_irqchip_acpi_probe_table; > > + devid < &__dsdt_irqchip_acpi_probe_table_end; devid++) { > > + if (devid->id && !strcmp(devid->id, hwid->id)) { > > + result = &device->fwnode; > > + break; > > + } > > + } > > Looks like a candidate for linker table API. (I recommend to Cc Luis > for this part) This linker table entry scheme is just an optimization and should not gate the series. > > + } > > > +/** > > + * acpi_irq_parse_one_match - Handle a matching IRQ resource. > > + * @fwnode: matching fwnode > > + * @hwirq: hardware IRQ number > > + * @triggering: triggering attributes of hwirq > > + * @polarity: polarity attributes of hwirq > > + * @polarity: polarity attributes of hwirq > > + * @shareable: shareable attributes of hwirq > > + * @ctx: acpi_irq_parse_one_ctx updated by this function > > + * > > + * Description: > > + * Handle a matching IRQ resource by populating the given ctx with > > + * the information passed. > > + */ > > +static inline void acpi_irq_parse_one_match(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, > > + u32 hwirq, u8 triggering, > > + u8 polarity, u8 shareable, > > + struct acpi_irq_parse_one_ctx *ctx) > > +{ > > > + if (!fwnode) > > + return; > > > + ctx->rc = 0; > > Perhaps ctx->rc = fwnode ? 0 : -EINVAL; ? > > > + *ctx->res_flags = acpi_dev_irq_flags(triggering, polarity, shareable); > > + ctx->fwspec->fwnode = fwnode; > > + ctx->fwspec->param[0] = hwirq; > > + ctx->fwspec->param[1] = acpi_dev_get_irq_type(triggering, polarity); > > + ctx->fwspec->param_count = 2; > > +} > > > +int acpi_irq_get(acpi_handle handle, unsigned int index, struct resource *res) > > +{ > > + struct irq_fwspec fwspec; > > + struct irq_domain *domain; > > + unsigned long flags; > > + int rc; > > + > > + rc = acpi_irq_parse_one(handle, index, &fwspec, &flags); > > + if (rc) > > + return rc; > > + > > + domain = irq_find_matching_fwnode(fwspec.fwnode, DOMAIN_BUS_ANY); > > + if (!domain) > > + return -EPROBE_DEFER; > > + > > + rc = irq_create_fwspec_mapping(&fwspec); > > + if (rc <= 0) > > Is rc = 0 an error? Yes. > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + res->start = rc; > > + res->end = rc; > > + res->flags = flags; > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_irq_get); > > > --- a/drivers/base/platform.c > > +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c > > @@ -102,6 +102,14 @@ int platform_get_irq(struct platform_device *dev, unsigned int num) > > > r = platform_get_resource(dev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, num); > > + if (r && r->flags & IORESOURCE_DISABLED && has_acpi_companion(&dev->dev)) { > > + int ret; > > + > > + ret = acpi_irq_get(ACPI_HANDLE(&dev->dev), num, r); > > + if (ret) > > + return ret; > > + } > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_GSI > > #if IS_ENABLED() > > > +int acpi_irq_get(acpi_handle handle, unsigned int index, struct resource *res); > > +#else > > +static inline int acpi_irq_get(acpi_handle handle, unsigned int index, > > + struct resource *res) > > Perhaps > > static inline > int ... It is late -rc5 and notwithstanding cosmetics changes, can we make progress with this patch series or not please ? Thanks, Lorenzo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 03:01:18AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 4:34 AM, Agustin Vega-Frias >> <agustinv@codeaurora.org> wrote: >> > ACPI extended IRQ resources may contain a ResourceSource to specify >> > an alternate interrupt controller. Introduce acpi_irq_get and use it >> > to implement ResourceSource/IRQ domain mapping. >> > >> > The new API is similar to of_irq_get and allows re-initialization >> > of a platform resource from the ACPI extended IRQ resource, and >> > provides proper behavior for probe deferral when the domain is not >> > yet present when called. >> > + list_for_each_entry(hwid, &device->pnp.ids, list) { >> >> > + for (devid = &__dsdt_irqchip_acpi_probe_table; >> > + devid < &__dsdt_irqchip_acpi_probe_table_end; devid++) { >> > + if (devid->id && !strcmp(devid->id, hwid->id)) { >> > + result = &device->fwnode; >> > + break; >> > + } >> > + } >> >> Looks like a candidate for linker table API. (I recommend to Cc Luis >> for this part) > > This linker table entry scheme is just an optimization and should > not gate the series. That's correct. Though Luis might give some advice regarding to this piece of code. >> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_GSI >> >> #if IS_ENABLED() >> > +int acpi_irq_get(acpi_handle handle, unsigned int index, struct resource *res); >> > +#else >> > +static inline int acpi_irq_get(acpi_handle handle, unsigned int index, >> > + struct resource *res) >> >> Perhaps >> >> static inline >> int ... > > It is late -rc5 and notwithstanding cosmetics changes, can we make > progress with this patch series or not please ? I agree for the second case from what's left above, first one might be useful to amend. At the end it's a Rafael's word, I'm not insisting on cosmetic changes. So, what about the rest?
On Thursday, January 26, 2017 10:15:21 AM Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 03:01:18AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 4:34 AM, Agustin Vega-Frias > > <agustinv@codeaurora.org> wrote: > > > ACPI extended IRQ resources may contain a ResourceSource to specify > > > an alternate interrupt controller. Introduce acpi_irq_get and use it > > > to implement ResourceSource/IRQ domain mapping. > > > > > > The new API is similar to of_irq_get and allows re-initialization > > > of a platform resource from the ACPI extended IRQ resource, and > > > provides proper behavior for probe deferral when the domain is not > > > yet present when called. > > > > > +static struct fwnode_handle * > > > +acpi_get_irq_source_fwhandle(const struct acpi_resource_source *source) > > > +{ > > > + struct fwnode_handle *result = NULL; > > > + struct acpi_device *device; > > > + struct acpi_hardware_id *hwid; > > > + struct acpi_device_id *devid; > > > + acpi_handle handle; > > > + acpi_status status; > > > + > > > + if (!source->string_length) > > > + return acpi_gsi_domain_id; > > > + > > > + status = acpi_get_handle(NULL, source->string_ptr, &handle); > > > + if (WARN_ON(ACPI_FAILURE(status))) > > > + return NULL; > > > + > > > + device = acpi_bus_get_acpi_device(handle); > > > + if (WARN_ON(!device)) > > > + return NULL; > > > + > > > > > + list_for_each_entry(hwid, &device->pnp.ids, list) { > > > > > + for (devid = &__dsdt_irqchip_acpi_probe_table; > > > + devid < &__dsdt_irqchip_acpi_probe_table_end; devid++) { > > > + if (devid->id && !strcmp(devid->id, hwid->id)) { > > > + result = &device->fwnode; > > > + break; > > > + } > > > + } > > > > Looks like a candidate for linker table API. (I recommend to Cc Luis > > for this part) > > This linker table entry scheme is just an optimization and should > not gate the series. > > > > + } > > > > > +/** > > > + * acpi_irq_parse_one_match - Handle a matching IRQ resource. > > > + * @fwnode: matching fwnode > > > + * @hwirq: hardware IRQ number > > > + * @triggering: triggering attributes of hwirq > > > + * @polarity: polarity attributes of hwirq > > > + * @polarity: polarity attributes of hwirq > > > + * @shareable: shareable attributes of hwirq > > > + * @ctx: acpi_irq_parse_one_ctx updated by this function > > > + * > > > + * Description: > > > + * Handle a matching IRQ resource by populating the given ctx with > > > + * the information passed. > > > + */ > > > +static inline void acpi_irq_parse_one_match(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, > > > + u32 hwirq, u8 triggering, > > > + u8 polarity, u8 shareable, > > > + struct acpi_irq_parse_one_ctx *ctx) > > > +{ > > > > > + if (!fwnode) > > > + return; > > > > > + ctx->rc = 0; > > > > Perhaps ctx->rc = fwnode ? 0 : -EINVAL; ? > > > > > + *ctx->res_flags = acpi_dev_irq_flags(triggering, polarity, shareable); > > > + ctx->fwspec->fwnode = fwnode; > > > + ctx->fwspec->param[0] = hwirq; > > > + ctx->fwspec->param[1] = acpi_dev_get_irq_type(triggering, polarity); > > > + ctx->fwspec->param_count = 2; > > > +} > > > > > +int acpi_irq_get(acpi_handle handle, unsigned int index, struct resource *res) > > > +{ > > > + struct irq_fwspec fwspec; > > > + struct irq_domain *domain; > > > + unsigned long flags; > > > + int rc; > > > + > > > + rc = acpi_irq_parse_one(handle, index, &fwspec, &flags); > > > + if (rc) > > > + return rc; > > > + > > > + domain = irq_find_matching_fwnode(fwspec.fwnode, DOMAIN_BUS_ANY); > > > + if (!domain) > > > + return -EPROBE_DEFER; > > > + > > > + rc = irq_create_fwspec_mapping(&fwspec); > > > + if (rc <= 0) > > > > Is rc = 0 an error? > > Yes. > > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > + > > > + res->start = rc; > > > + res->end = rc; > > > + res->flags = flags; > > > + > > > + return 0; > > > +} > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_irq_get); > > > > > --- a/drivers/base/platform.c > > > +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c > > > @@ -102,6 +102,14 @@ int platform_get_irq(struct platform_device *dev, unsigned int num) > > > > > r = platform_get_resource(dev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, num); > > > + if (r && r->flags & IORESOURCE_DISABLED && has_acpi_companion(&dev->dev)) { > > > + int ret; > > > + > > > + ret = acpi_irq_get(ACPI_HANDLE(&dev->dev), num, r); > > > + if (ret) > > > + return ret; > > > + } > > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_GSI > > > > #if IS_ENABLED() > > > > > +int acpi_irq_get(acpi_handle handle, unsigned int index, struct resource *res); > > > +#else > > > +static inline int acpi_irq_get(acpi_handle handle, unsigned int index, > > > + struct resource *res) > > > > Perhaps > > > > static inline > > int ... > > It is late -rc5 and notwithstanding cosmetics changes, can we make > progress with this patch series or not please ? Yes, we can. I've just returned from travels and have not had the time to look at things in detail yet. I sent a notice about my travel in advance specifically so people didn't expect me to respond while I was traveling, but obviously everybody simply ignored it and went ahead with their lives. And then I get messages like this which doesn't make me happy at all. I will start processing things shortly, but there is a backlog I need to work through and this one may not be the first item in it. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:43:43AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, January 26, 2017 10:15:21 AM Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 03:01:18AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 4:34 AM, Agustin Vega-Frias > > > <agustinv@codeaurora.org> wrote: > > > > ACPI extended IRQ resources may contain a ResourceSource to specify > > > > an alternate interrupt controller. Introduce acpi_irq_get and use it > > > > to implement ResourceSource/IRQ domain mapping. > > > > > > > > The new API is similar to of_irq_get and allows re-initialization > > > > of a platform resource from the ACPI extended IRQ resource, and > > > > provides proper behavior for probe deferral when the domain is not > > > > yet present when called. > > > > > > > +static struct fwnode_handle * > > > > +acpi_get_irq_source_fwhandle(const struct acpi_resource_source *source) > > > > +{ > > > > + struct fwnode_handle *result = NULL; > > > > + struct acpi_device *device; > > > > + struct acpi_hardware_id *hwid; > > > > + struct acpi_device_id *devid; > > > > + acpi_handle handle; > > > > + acpi_status status; > > > > + > > > > + if (!source->string_length) > > > > + return acpi_gsi_domain_id; > > > > + > > > > + status = acpi_get_handle(NULL, source->string_ptr, &handle); > > > > + if (WARN_ON(ACPI_FAILURE(status))) > > > > + return NULL; > > > > + > > > > + device = acpi_bus_get_acpi_device(handle); > > > > + if (WARN_ON(!device)) > > > > + return NULL; > > > > + > > > > > > > + list_for_each_entry(hwid, &device->pnp.ids, list) { > > > > > > > + for (devid = &__dsdt_irqchip_acpi_probe_table; > > > > + devid < &__dsdt_irqchip_acpi_probe_table_end; devid++) { > > > > + if (devid->id && !strcmp(devid->id, hwid->id)) { > > > > + result = &device->fwnode; > > > > + break; > > > > + } > > > > + } > > > > > > Looks like a candidate for linker table API. (I recommend to Cc Luis > > > for this part) > > > > This linker table entry scheme is just an optimization and should > > not gate the series. > > > > > > + } > > > > > > > +/** > > > > + * acpi_irq_parse_one_match - Handle a matching IRQ resource. > > > > + * @fwnode: matching fwnode > > > > + * @hwirq: hardware IRQ number > > > > + * @triggering: triggering attributes of hwirq > > > > + * @polarity: polarity attributes of hwirq > > > > + * @polarity: polarity attributes of hwirq > > > > + * @shareable: shareable attributes of hwirq > > > > + * @ctx: acpi_irq_parse_one_ctx updated by this function > > > > + * > > > > + * Description: > > > > + * Handle a matching IRQ resource by populating the given ctx with > > > > + * the information passed. > > > > + */ > > > > +static inline void acpi_irq_parse_one_match(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, > > > > + u32 hwirq, u8 triggering, > > > > + u8 polarity, u8 shareable, > > > > + struct acpi_irq_parse_one_ctx *ctx) > > > > +{ > > > > > > > + if (!fwnode) > > > > + return; > > > > > > > + ctx->rc = 0; > > > > > > Perhaps ctx->rc = fwnode ? 0 : -EINVAL; ? > > > > > > > + *ctx->res_flags = acpi_dev_irq_flags(triggering, polarity, shareable); > > > > + ctx->fwspec->fwnode = fwnode; > > > > + ctx->fwspec->param[0] = hwirq; > > > > + ctx->fwspec->param[1] = acpi_dev_get_irq_type(triggering, polarity); > > > > + ctx->fwspec->param_count = 2; > > > > +} > > > > > > > +int acpi_irq_get(acpi_handle handle, unsigned int index, struct resource *res) > > > > +{ > > > > + struct irq_fwspec fwspec; > > > > + struct irq_domain *domain; > > > > + unsigned long flags; > > > > + int rc; > > > > + > > > > + rc = acpi_irq_parse_one(handle, index, &fwspec, &flags); > > > > + if (rc) > > > > + return rc; > > > > + > > > > + domain = irq_find_matching_fwnode(fwspec.fwnode, DOMAIN_BUS_ANY); > > > > + if (!domain) > > > > + return -EPROBE_DEFER; > > > > + > > > > + rc = irq_create_fwspec_mapping(&fwspec); > > > > + if (rc <= 0) > > > > > > Is rc = 0 an error? > > > > Yes. > > > > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > > + > > > > + res->start = rc; > > > > + res->end = rc; > > > > + res->flags = flags; > > > > + > > > > + return 0; > > > > +} > > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_irq_get); > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/base/platform.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c > > > > @@ -102,6 +102,14 @@ int platform_get_irq(struct platform_device *dev, unsigned int num) > > > > > > > r = platform_get_resource(dev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, num); > > > > + if (r && r->flags & IORESOURCE_DISABLED && has_acpi_companion(&dev->dev)) { > > > > + int ret; > > > > + > > > > + ret = acpi_irq_get(ACPI_HANDLE(&dev->dev), num, r); > > > > + if (ret) > > > > + return ret; > > > > + } > > > > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_GSI > > > > > > #if IS_ENABLED() > > > > > > > +int acpi_irq_get(acpi_handle handle, unsigned int index, struct resource *res); > > > > +#else > > > > +static inline int acpi_irq_get(acpi_handle handle, unsigned int index, > > > > + struct resource *res) > > > > > > Perhaps > > > > > > static inline > > > int ... > > > > It is late -rc5 and notwithstanding cosmetics changes, can we make > > progress with this patch series or not please ? > > Yes, we can. > > I've just returned from travels and have not had the time to look at things in > detail yet. > > I sent a notice about my travel in advance specifically so people didn't expect > me to respond while I was traveling, but obviously everybody simply ignored it > and went ahead with their lives. And then I get messages like this which > doesn't make me happy at all. I had to ask given that there are other series that depend on it and that this code will eventually have to go via a tree that is not ACPI, so that will require some coordination and it is getting late in the cycle, that's all my message was meant for, apologies. > I will start processing things shortly, but there is a backlog I need to work > through and this one may not be the first item in it. Ok no problems then, thank you ! Lorenzo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Makefile b/drivers/acpi/Makefile index 9ed0878..a391bbc 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/Makefile +++ b/drivers/acpi/Makefile @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ acpi-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS) += debugfs.o acpi-$(CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA) += numa.o acpi-$(CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER) += cm_sbs.o acpi-y += acpi_lpat.o -acpi-$(CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_GSI) += gsi.o +acpi-$(CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_GSI) += irq.o acpi-$(CONFIG_ACPI_WATCHDOG) += acpi_watchdog.o # These are (potentially) separate modules diff --git a/drivers/acpi/gsi.c b/drivers/acpi/irq.c similarity index 28% rename from drivers/acpi/gsi.c rename to drivers/acpi/irq.c index ee9e0f2..db4ee4c 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/gsi.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/irq.c @@ -85,6 +85,227 @@ void acpi_unregister_gsi(u32 gsi) EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_unregister_gsi); /** + * acpi_get_irq_source_fwhandle() - Retrieve fwhandle from IRQ resource source. + * @source: acpi_resource_source to use for the lookup. + * + * Description: + * Retrieve the fwhandle of the device referenced by the given IRQ resource + * source. In addition to it being a valid ACPI device, its _HID must be + * listed on the probe table of ACPI DSDT irqchips. The check is used to + * determine if a driver for the referenced device is available and decide + * if we should try deferred probing if the device has not been probed yet. + * Drivers must use the __dsdt_irqchip attribute when declaring the table + * of acpi_device_ids for the device, e.g.: + * + * static const struct acpi_device_id my_device_ids[] __dsdt_irqchip = { + * { "ABCD0123", }, + * { } + * }; + * + * Return: + * The referenced device fwhandle or NULL on failure + */ +static struct fwnode_handle * +acpi_get_irq_source_fwhandle(const struct acpi_resource_source *source) +{ + struct fwnode_handle *result = NULL; + struct acpi_device *device; + struct acpi_hardware_id *hwid; + struct acpi_device_id *devid; + acpi_handle handle; + acpi_status status; + + if (!source->string_length) + return acpi_gsi_domain_id; + + status = acpi_get_handle(NULL, source->string_ptr, &handle); + if (WARN_ON(ACPI_FAILURE(status))) + return NULL; + + device = acpi_bus_get_acpi_device(handle); + if (WARN_ON(!device)) + return NULL; + + list_for_each_entry(hwid, &device->pnp.ids, list) { + for (devid = &__dsdt_irqchip_acpi_probe_table; + devid < &__dsdt_irqchip_acpi_probe_table_end; devid++) { + if (devid->id && !strcmp(devid->id, hwid->id)) { + result = &device->fwnode; + break; + } + } + } + + acpi_bus_put_acpi_device(device); + + return result; +} + +/* + * Context for the resource walk used to lookup IRQ resources. + * Contains a return code, the lookup index, and references to the flags + * and fwspec where the result is returned. + */ +struct acpi_irq_parse_one_ctx { + int rc; + unsigned int index; + unsigned long *res_flags; + struct irq_fwspec *fwspec; +}; + +/** + * acpi_irq_parse_one_match - Handle a matching IRQ resource. + * @fwnode: matching fwnode + * @hwirq: hardware IRQ number + * @triggering: triggering attributes of hwirq + * @polarity: polarity attributes of hwirq + * @polarity: polarity attributes of hwirq + * @shareable: shareable attributes of hwirq + * @ctx: acpi_irq_parse_one_ctx updated by this function + * + * Description: + * Handle a matching IRQ resource by populating the given ctx with + * the information passed. + */ +static inline void acpi_irq_parse_one_match(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, + u32 hwirq, u8 triggering, + u8 polarity, u8 shareable, + struct acpi_irq_parse_one_ctx *ctx) +{ + if (!fwnode) + return; + ctx->rc = 0; + *ctx->res_flags = acpi_dev_irq_flags(triggering, polarity, shareable); + ctx->fwspec->fwnode = fwnode; + ctx->fwspec->param[0] = hwirq; + ctx->fwspec->param[1] = acpi_dev_get_irq_type(triggering, polarity); + ctx->fwspec->param_count = 2; +} + +/** + * acpi_irq_parse_one_cb - Handle the given resource. + * @ares: resource to handle + * @context: context for the walk + * + * Description: + * This is called by acpi_walk_resources passing each resource returned by + * the _CRS method. We only inspect IRQ resources. Since IRQ resources + * might contain multiple interrupts we check if the index is within this + * one's interrupt array, otherwise we subtract the current resource IRQ + * count from the lookup index to prepare for the next resource. + * Once a match is found we call acpi_irq_parse_one_match to populate + * the result and end the walk by returning AE_CTRL_TERMINATE. + * + * Return: + * AE_OK if the walk should continue, AE_CTRL_TERMINATE if a matching + * IRQ resource was found. + */ +static acpi_status acpi_irq_parse_one_cb(struct acpi_resource *ares, + void *context) +{ + struct acpi_irq_parse_one_ctx *ctx = context; + struct acpi_resource_irq *irq; + struct acpi_resource_extended_irq *eirq; + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode; + + switch (ares->type) { + case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_IRQ: + irq = &ares->data.irq; + if (ctx->index >= irq->interrupt_count) { + ctx->index -= irq->interrupt_count; + return AE_OK; + } + fwnode = acpi_gsi_domain_id; + acpi_irq_parse_one_match(fwnode, irq->interrupts[ctx->index], + irq->triggering, irq->polarity, + irq->sharable, ctx); + return AE_CTRL_TERMINATE; + case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_EXTENDED_IRQ: + eirq = &ares->data.extended_irq; + if (eirq->producer_consumer == ACPI_PRODUCER) + return AE_OK; + if (ctx->index >= eirq->interrupt_count) { + ctx->index -= eirq->interrupt_count; + return AE_OK; + } + fwnode = acpi_get_irq_source_fwhandle(&eirq->resource_source); + acpi_irq_parse_one_match(fwnode, eirq->interrupts[ctx->index], + eirq->triggering, eirq->polarity, + eirq->sharable, ctx); + return AE_CTRL_TERMINATE; + } + + return AE_OK; +} + +/** + * acpi_irq_parse_one - Resolve an interrupt for a device + * @handle: the device whose interrupt is to be resolved + * @index: index of the interrupt to resolve + * @fwspec: structure irq_fwspec filled by this function + * @flags: resource flags filled by this function + * + * Description: + * Resolves an interrupt for a device by walking its CRS resources to find + * the appropriate ACPI IRQ resource and populating the given struct irq_fwspec + * and flags. + * + * Return: + * The result stored in ctx.rc by the callback, or the default -EINVAL value + * if an error occurs. + */ +static int acpi_irq_parse_one(acpi_handle handle, unsigned int index, + struct irq_fwspec *fwspec, unsigned long *flags) +{ + struct acpi_irq_parse_one_ctx ctx = { -EINVAL, index, flags, fwspec }; + + acpi_walk_resources(handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS, acpi_irq_parse_one_cb, &ctx); + return ctx.rc; +} + +/** + * acpi_irq_get - Lookup an ACPI IRQ resource and use it to initialize resource. + * @handle: ACPI device handle + * @index: ACPI IRQ resource index to lookup + * @res: Linux IRQ resource to initialize + * + * Description: + * Look for the ACPI IRQ resource with the given index and use it to initialize + * the given Linux IRQ resource. + * + * Return: + * 0 on success + * -EINVAL if an error occurs + * -EPROBE_DEFER if the IRQ lookup/conversion failed + */ +int acpi_irq_get(acpi_handle handle, unsigned int index, struct resource *res) +{ + struct irq_fwspec fwspec; + struct irq_domain *domain; + unsigned long flags; + int rc; + + rc = acpi_irq_parse_one(handle, index, &fwspec, &flags); + if (rc) + return rc; + + domain = irq_find_matching_fwnode(fwspec.fwnode, DOMAIN_BUS_ANY); + if (!domain) + return -EPROBE_DEFER; + + rc = irq_create_fwspec_mapping(&fwspec); + if (rc <= 0) + return -EINVAL; + + res->start = rc; + res->end = rc; + res->flags = flags; + + return 0; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_irq_get); + +/** * acpi_set_irq_model - Setup the GSI irqdomain information * @model: the value assigned to acpi_irq_model * @fwnode: the irq_domain identifier for mapping and looking up diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c index c4af003..040d474 100644 --- a/drivers/base/platform.c +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c @@ -102,6 +102,14 @@ int platform_get_irq(struct platform_device *dev, unsigned int num) } r = platform_get_resource(dev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, num); + if (r && r->flags & IORESOURCE_DISABLED && has_acpi_companion(&dev->dev)) { + int ret; + + ret = acpi_irq_get(ACPI_HANDLE(&dev->dev), num, r); + if (ret) + return ret; + } + /* * The resources may pass trigger flags to the irqs that need * to be set up. It so happens that the trigger flags for diff --git a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h index 0968d13..0763c8a 100644 --- a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h +++ b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h @@ -567,6 +567,7 @@ ACPI_PROBE_TABLE(irqchip) \ ACPI_PROBE_TABLE(clksrc) \ ACPI_PROBE_TABLE(iort) \ + ACPI_PROBE_TABLE(dsdt_irqchip) \ EARLYCON_TABLE() #define INIT_TEXT \ diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h index 5b36974..15fac1a 100644 --- a/include/linux/acpi.h +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h @@ -1056,6 +1056,11 @@ struct acpi_probe_entry { (&ACPI_PROBE_TABLE_END(t) - \ &ACPI_PROBE_TABLE(t))); \ }) + +#define __dsdt_irqchip __section(__dsdt_irqchip_acpi_probe_table) +extern struct acpi_device_id __dsdt_irqchip_acpi_probe_table; +extern struct acpi_device_id __dsdt_irqchip_acpi_probe_table_end; + #else static inline int acpi_dev_get_property(struct acpi_device *adev, const char *name, acpi_object_type type, @@ -1153,4 +1158,14 @@ static inline void acpi_table_upgrade(void) { } static inline int parse_spcr(bool earlycon) { return 0; } #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_GSI +int acpi_irq_get(acpi_handle handle, unsigned int index, struct resource *res); +#else +static inline int acpi_irq_get(acpi_handle handle, unsigned int index, + struct resource *res) +{ + return -EINVAL; +} +#endif + #endif /*_LINUX_ACPI_H*/
ACPI extended IRQ resources may contain a ResourceSource to specify an alternate interrupt controller. Introduce acpi_irq_get and use it to implement ResourceSource/IRQ domain mapping. The new API is similar to of_irq_get and allows re-initialization of a platform resource from the ACPI extended IRQ resource, and provides proper behavior for probe deferral when the domain is not yet present when called. Signed-off-by: Agustin Vega-Frias <agustinv@codeaurora.org> --- drivers/acpi/Makefile | 2 +- drivers/acpi/{gsi.c => irq.c} | 221 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/base/platform.c | 8 ++ include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h | 1 + include/linux/acpi.h | 15 +++ 5 files changed, 246 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) rename drivers/acpi/{gsi.c => irq.c} (28%)