diff mbox

[1/5] drm/i915/perf: fix gen7_append_oa_reports comment

Message ID 20170124012548.12603-2-robert@sixbynine.org (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Robert Bragg Jan. 24, 2017, 1:25 a.m. UTC
If I'm going to complain about a back-to-front convention then the least
I can do is not muddle the comment up too.

Signed-off-by: Robert Bragg <robert@sixbynine.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Matthew Auld Jan. 25, 2017, 3:46 p.m. UTC | #1
On 24 January 2017 at 01:25, Robert Bragg <robert@sixbynine.org> wrote:
> If I'm going to complain about a back-to-front convention then the least
> I can do is not muddle the comment up too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Bragg <robert@sixbynine.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
index a1b7eec58be2..b0eec762b9b4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
@@ -431,7 +431,7 @@  static int append_oa_sample(struct i915_perf_stream *stream,
  * userspace.
  *
  * Note: reports are consumed from the head, and appended to the
- * tail, so the head chases the tail?... If you think that's mad
+ * tail, so the tail chases the head?... If you think that's mad
  * and back-to-front you're not alone, but this follows the
  * Gen PRM naming convention.
  *