diff mbox

[v2] KVM: x86: don't hold kvm->lock in KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING

Message ID 20170428150620.9584-1-david@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

David Hildenbrand April 28, 2017, 3:06 p.m. UTC 
We needed the lock to avoid racing with creation of the irqchip on x86. As
kvm_set_irq_routing() calls srcu_synchronize_expedited(), this lock
might be held for a longer time.

Let's introduce an arch specific callback to check if we can actually
add irq routes. For x86, all we have to do is check if we have an
irqchip in the kernel. We don't need kvm->lock at that point as the
irqchip is marked as inititalized only when actually fully created.

Reported-by: Steve Rutherford <srutherford@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Fixes: 1df6ddede10a ("KVM: x86: race between KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING and KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP")
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  1 -
 arch/x86/kvm/irq.h              |  2 +-
 arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c         | 15 +++++++++------
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              | 11 +----------
 include/linux/kvm_host.h        |  1 +
 virt/kvm/irqchip.c              |  5 +++++
 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c             |  5 ++---
 7 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 2cc5ec7..d962fa9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -726,7 +726,6 @@  struct kvm_hv {
 
 enum kvm_irqchip_mode {
 	KVM_IRQCHIP_NONE,
-	KVM_IRQCHIP_INIT_IN_PROGRESS, /* temporarily set during creation */
 	KVM_IRQCHIP_KERNEL,       /* created with KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP */
 	KVM_IRQCHIP_SPLIT,        /* created with KVM_CAP_SPLIT_IRQCHIP */
 };
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/irq.h b/arch/x86/kvm/irq.h
index 0edd22c..d5005cc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/irq.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/irq.h
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@  static inline int irqchip_in_kernel(struct kvm *kvm)
 
 	/* Matches smp_wmb() when setting irqchip_mode */
 	smp_rmb();
-	return mode > KVM_IRQCHIP_INIT_IN_PROGRESS;
+	return mode != KVM_IRQCHIP_NONE;
 }
 
 void kvm_inject_pending_timer_irqs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c
index 4517a4c..3cc3b2d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c
@@ -274,16 +274,19 @@  void kvm_fire_mask_notifiers(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned irqchip, unsigned pin,
 	srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->irq_srcu, idx);
 }
 
+bool kvm_arch_can_set_irq_routing(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+	return irqchip_in_kernel(kvm);
+}
+
 int kvm_set_routing_entry(struct kvm *kvm,
 			  struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e,
 			  const struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *ue)
 {
-	/* also allow creation of routes during KVM_IRQCHIP_INIT_IN_PROGRESS */
-	if (kvm->arch.irqchip_mode == KVM_IRQCHIP_NONE)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	/* Matches smp_wmb() when setting irqchip_mode */
-	smp_rmb();
+	/* We can't check irqchip_in_kernel() here as some callers are
+	 * currently inititalizing the irqchip. Other callers should therefore
+	 * check kvm_arch_can_set_irq_routing() before calling this function.
+	 */
 	switch (ue->type) {
 	case KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_IRQCHIP:
 		if (irqchip_split(kvm))
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 34bf64f..eae0e9c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -3911,14 +3911,9 @@  static int kvm_vm_ioctl_enable_cap(struct kvm *kvm,
 			goto split_irqchip_unlock;
 		if (kvm->created_vcpus)
 			goto split_irqchip_unlock;
-		kvm->arch.irqchip_mode = KVM_IRQCHIP_INIT_IN_PROGRESS;
 		r = kvm_setup_empty_irq_routing(kvm);
-		if (r) {
-			kvm->arch.irqchip_mode = KVM_IRQCHIP_NONE;
-			/* Pairs with smp_rmb() when reading irqchip_mode */
-			smp_wmb();
+		if (r)
 			goto split_irqchip_unlock;
-		}
 		/* Pairs with irqchip_in_kernel. */
 		smp_wmb();
 		kvm->arch.irqchip_mode = KVM_IRQCHIP_SPLIT;
@@ -4004,12 +3999,8 @@  long kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp,
 			goto create_irqchip_unlock;
 		}
 
-		kvm->arch.irqchip_mode = KVM_IRQCHIP_INIT_IN_PROGRESS;
 		r = kvm_setup_default_irq_routing(kvm);
 		if (r) {
-			kvm->arch.irqchip_mode = KVM_IRQCHIP_NONE;
-			/* Pairs with smp_rmb() when reading irqchip_mode */
-			smp_wmb();
 			kvm_ioapic_destroy(kvm);
 			kvm_pic_destroy(kvm);
 			goto create_irqchip_unlock;
diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index 397b7b5..b725d4e 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -1009,6 +1009,7 @@  static inline int mmu_notifier_retry(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long mmu_seq)
 #define KVM_MAX_IRQ_ROUTES 1024
 #endif
 
+bool kvm_arch_can_set_irq_routing(struct kvm *kvm);
 int kvm_set_irq_routing(struct kvm *kvm,
 			const struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *entries,
 			unsigned nr,
diff --git a/virt/kvm/irqchip.c b/virt/kvm/irqchip.c
index cc30d01..31e40c9 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/irqchip.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/irqchip.c
@@ -172,6 +172,11 @@  void __attribute__((weak)) kvm_arch_irq_routing_update(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
 }
 
+bool __weak kvm_arch_can_set_irq_routing(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+	return true;
+}
+
 int kvm_set_irq_routing(struct kvm *kvm,
 			const struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *ue,
 			unsigned nr,
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 357e67c..0a37ba4 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -3054,6 +3054,8 @@  static long kvm_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp,
 		if (copy_from_user(&routing, argp, sizeof(routing)))
 			goto out;
 		r = -EINVAL;
+		if (!kvm_arch_can_set_irq_routing(kvm))
+			goto out;
 		if (routing.nr > KVM_MAX_IRQ_ROUTES)
 			goto out;
 		if (routing.flags)
@@ -3069,11 +3071,8 @@  static long kvm_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp,
 					   routing.nr * sizeof(*entries)))
 				goto out_free_irq_routing;
 		}
-		/* avoid races with KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP on x86 */
-		mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
 		r = kvm_set_irq_routing(kvm, entries, routing.nr,
 					routing.flags);
-		mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
 out_free_irq_routing:
 		vfree(entries);
 		break;