diff mbox

[RFC,1/3] mmc: sdio: Don't use abort-able claim host method from SDIO IRQ thread

Message ID 1494506343-28572-2-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@linaro.org (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Ulf Hansson May 11, 2017, 12:39 p.m. UTC
In a step to simplify the use of the lock, mmc_claim|release_host(), let's
change the SDIO IRQ thread to move away from using the abort-able claim
host method.

In the SDIO IRQ thread case, we can instead check the numbers of SDIO IRQs
that are currently claimed via host->sdio_irqs, as this field is protected
from updates unless the host is claimed. When host->sdio_irqs has become
zero, it means the SDIO func driver(s) has released the SDIO IRQ, then we
can bail out and stop running the SDIO IRQ thread.

Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c | 10 ++++++----
 include/linux/mmc/host.h    |  1 -
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Comments

Adrian Hunter May 12, 2017, 7:42 a.m. UTC | #1
On 11/05/17 15:39, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> In a step to simplify the use of the lock, mmc_claim|release_host(), let's
> change the SDIO IRQ thread to move away from using the abort-able claim
> host method.
> 
> In the SDIO IRQ thread case, we can instead check the numbers of SDIO IRQs
> that are currently claimed via host->sdio_irqs, as this field is protected
> from updates unless the host is claimed. When host->sdio_irqs has become
> zero, it means the SDIO func driver(s) has released the SDIO IRQ, then we
> can bail out and stop running the SDIO IRQ thread.

Does that work?  It looks a like kthread_stop() will wait on the thread,
which is waiting to claim the host, which is claimed by the caller of
sdio_card_irq_put() which called kthread_stop() i.e. deadlock.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c | 10 ++++++----
>  include/linux/mmc/host.h    |  1 -
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
> index 6d4b720..95f7a09 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
> @@ -137,9 +137,13 @@ static int sdio_irq_thread(void *_host)
>  		 * holding of the host lock does not cover too much work
>  		 * that doesn't require that lock to be held.
>  		 */
> -		ret = __mmc_claim_host(host, &host->sdio_irq_thread_abort);
> -		if (ret)
> +		mmc_claim_host(host);
> +		if (!host->sdio_irqs) {
> +			ret = 1;
> +			mmc_release_host(host);
>  			break;
> +		}
> +
>  		ret = process_sdio_pending_irqs(host);
>  		host->sdio_irq_pending = false;
>  		mmc_release_host(host);
> @@ -195,7 +199,6 @@ static int sdio_card_irq_get(struct mmc_card *card)
>  
>  	if (!host->sdio_irqs++) {
>  		if (!(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD)) {
> -			atomic_set(&host->sdio_irq_thread_abort, 0);
>  			host->sdio_irq_thread =
>  				kthread_run(sdio_irq_thread, host,
>  					    "ksdioirqd/%s", mmc_hostname(host));
> @@ -223,7 +226,6 @@ static int sdio_card_irq_put(struct mmc_card *card)
>  
>  	if (!--host->sdio_irqs) {
>  		if (!(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD)) {
> -			atomic_set(&host->sdio_irq_thread_abort, 1);
>  			kthread_stop(host->sdio_irq_thread);
>  		} else if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ) {
>  			host->ops->enable_sdio_irq(host, 0);
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> index 21385ac..8a4131f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> @@ -359,7 +359,6 @@ struct mmc_host {
>  	unsigned int		sdio_irqs;
>  	struct task_struct	*sdio_irq_thread;
>  	bool			sdio_irq_pending;
> -	atomic_t		sdio_irq_thread_abort;
>  
>  	mmc_pm_flag_t		pm_flags;	/* requested pm features */
>  
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Ulf Hansson May 15, 2017, 12:51 p.m. UTC | #2
On 12 May 2017 at 09:42, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> wrote:
> On 11/05/17 15:39, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> In a step to simplify the use of the lock, mmc_claim|release_host(), let's
>> change the SDIO IRQ thread to move away from using the abort-able claim
>> host method.
>>
>> In the SDIO IRQ thread case, we can instead check the numbers of SDIO IRQs
>> that are currently claimed via host->sdio_irqs, as this field is protected
>> from updates unless the host is claimed. When host->sdio_irqs has become
>> zero, it means the SDIO func driver(s) has released the SDIO IRQ, then we
>> can bail out and stop running the SDIO IRQ thread.
>
> Does that work?  It looks a like kthread_stop() will wait on the thread,
> which is waiting to claim the host, which is claimed by the caller of
> sdio_card_irq_put() which called kthread_stop() i.e. deadlock.

Adrian, you are right and thanks for your analyze!

Maybe it's better that I first continue with my other series,
converting the kthread to a work/work-queue. As that makes it easier
to move away from using the abort-able claim host API.

Kind regards
Uffe

>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c | 10 ++++++----
>>  include/linux/mmc/host.h    |  1 -
>>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
>> index 6d4b720..95f7a09 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
>> @@ -137,9 +137,13 @@ static int sdio_irq_thread(void *_host)
>>                * holding of the host lock does not cover too much work
>>                * that doesn't require that lock to be held.
>>                */
>> -             ret = __mmc_claim_host(host, &host->sdio_irq_thread_abort);
>> -             if (ret)
>> +             mmc_claim_host(host);
>> +             if (!host->sdio_irqs) {
>> +                     ret = 1;
>> +                     mmc_release_host(host);
>>                       break;
>> +             }
>> +
>>               ret = process_sdio_pending_irqs(host);
>>               host->sdio_irq_pending = false;
>>               mmc_release_host(host);
>> @@ -195,7 +199,6 @@ static int sdio_card_irq_get(struct mmc_card *card)
>>
>>       if (!host->sdio_irqs++) {
>>               if (!(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD)) {
>> -                     atomic_set(&host->sdio_irq_thread_abort, 0);
>>                       host->sdio_irq_thread =
>>                               kthread_run(sdio_irq_thread, host,
>>                                           "ksdioirqd/%s", mmc_hostname(host));
>> @@ -223,7 +226,6 @@ static int sdio_card_irq_put(struct mmc_card *card)
>>
>>       if (!--host->sdio_irqs) {
>>               if (!(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD)) {
>> -                     atomic_set(&host->sdio_irq_thread_abort, 1);
>>                       kthread_stop(host->sdio_irq_thread);
>>               } else if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ) {
>>                       host->ops->enable_sdio_irq(host, 0);
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
>> index 21385ac..8a4131f 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
>> @@ -359,7 +359,6 @@ struct mmc_host {
>>       unsigned int            sdio_irqs;
>>       struct task_struct      *sdio_irq_thread;
>>       bool                    sdio_irq_pending;
>> -     atomic_t                sdio_irq_thread_abort;
>>
>>       mmc_pm_flag_t           pm_flags;       /* requested pm features */
>>
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
index 6d4b720..95f7a09 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
@@ -137,9 +137,13 @@  static int sdio_irq_thread(void *_host)
 		 * holding of the host lock does not cover too much work
 		 * that doesn't require that lock to be held.
 		 */
-		ret = __mmc_claim_host(host, &host->sdio_irq_thread_abort);
-		if (ret)
+		mmc_claim_host(host);
+		if (!host->sdio_irqs) {
+			ret = 1;
+			mmc_release_host(host);
 			break;
+		}
+
 		ret = process_sdio_pending_irqs(host);
 		host->sdio_irq_pending = false;
 		mmc_release_host(host);
@@ -195,7 +199,6 @@  static int sdio_card_irq_get(struct mmc_card *card)
 
 	if (!host->sdio_irqs++) {
 		if (!(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD)) {
-			atomic_set(&host->sdio_irq_thread_abort, 0);
 			host->sdio_irq_thread =
 				kthread_run(sdio_irq_thread, host,
 					    "ksdioirqd/%s", mmc_hostname(host));
@@ -223,7 +226,6 @@  static int sdio_card_irq_put(struct mmc_card *card)
 
 	if (!--host->sdio_irqs) {
 		if (!(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD)) {
-			atomic_set(&host->sdio_irq_thread_abort, 1);
 			kthread_stop(host->sdio_irq_thread);
 		} else if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ) {
 			host->ops->enable_sdio_irq(host, 0);
diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
index 21385ac..8a4131f 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
@@ -359,7 +359,6 @@  struct mmc_host {
 	unsigned int		sdio_irqs;
 	struct task_struct	*sdio_irq_thread;
 	bool			sdio_irq_pending;
-	atomic_t		sdio_irq_thread_abort;
 
 	mmc_pm_flag_t		pm_flags;	/* requested pm features */