diff mbox

KVM: mark memory slots as rcu protected

Message ID 1499352359-5401-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Christian Borntraeger July 6, 2017, 2:45 p.m. UTC
we access the memslots array via srcu. Mark it as such and
use the right access functions also for the freeing of
memory slots.

Found by sparse:
./include/linux/kvm_host.h:565:16: error: incompatible types in
comparison expression (different address spaces)

Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/kvm_host.h | 2 +-
 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c      | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Christian Borntraeger July 6, 2017, 2:55 p.m. UTC | #1
On 07/06/2017 04:45 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> we access the memslots array via srcu. Mark it as such and
> use the right access functions also for the freeing of
> memory slots.
> 
> Found by sparse:
> ./include/linux/kvm_host.h:565:16: error: incompatible types in
> comparison expression (different address spaces)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/kvm_host.h | 2 +-
>  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c      | 4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> index bcd37b8..7c32905 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> @@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ struct kvm {
>  	spinlock_t mmu_lock;
>  	struct mutex slots_lock;
>  	struct mm_struct *mm; /* userspace tied to this vm */
> -	struct kvm_memslots *memslots[KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM];
> +	struct kvm_memslots __rcu *memslots[KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM];
>  	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpus[KVM_MAX_VCPUS];
> 
>  	/*
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index fc2d583..d4418fa 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -707,7 +707,7 @@ static struct kvm *kvm_create_vm(unsigned long type)
>  	for (i = 0; i < KVM_NR_BUSES; i++)
>  		kfree(kvm->buses[i]);
>  	for (i = 0; i < KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM; i++)
> -		kvm_free_memslots(kvm, kvm->memslots[i]);
> +		kvm_free_memslots(kvm, rcu_access_pointer(kvm->memslots[i]));

should these rather be rcu_dereference_protected ?


>  	kvm_arch_free_vm(kvm);
>  	mmdrop(current->mm);
>  	return ERR_PTR(r);
> @@ -753,7 +753,7 @@ static void kvm_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
>  	kvm_arch_destroy_vm(kvm);
>  	kvm_destroy_devices(kvm);
>  	for (i = 0; i < KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM; i++)
> -		kvm_free_memslots(kvm, kvm->memslots[i]);
> +		kvm_free_memslots(kvm, rcu_access_pointer(kvm->memslots[i]));
>  	cleanup_srcu_struct(&kvm->irq_srcu);
>  	cleanup_srcu_struct(&kvm->srcu);
>  	kvm_arch_free_vm(kvm);
>
Paolo Bonzini July 6, 2017, 2:57 p.m. UTC | #2
On 06/07/2017 16:55, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 07/06/2017 04:45 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> we access the memslots array via srcu. Mark it as such and
>> use the right access functions also for the freeing of
>> memory slots.
>>
>> Found by sparse:
>> ./include/linux/kvm_host.h:565:16: error: incompatible types in
>> comparison expression (different address spaces)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  include/linux/kvm_host.h | 2 +-
>>  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c      | 4 ++--
>>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
>> index bcd37b8..7c32905 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ struct kvm {
>>  	spinlock_t mmu_lock;
>>  	struct mutex slots_lock;
>>  	struct mm_struct *mm; /* userspace tied to this vm */
>> -	struct kvm_memslots *memslots[KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM];
>> +	struct kvm_memslots __rcu *memslots[KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM];
>>  	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpus[KVM_MAX_VCPUS];
>>
>>  	/*
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
>> index fc2d583..d4418fa 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
>> @@ -707,7 +707,7 @@ static struct kvm *kvm_create_vm(unsigned long type)
>>  	for (i = 0; i < KVM_NR_BUSES; i++)
>>  		kfree(kvm->buses[i]);
>>  	for (i = 0; i < KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM; i++)
>> -		kvm_free_memslots(kvm, kvm->memslots[i]);
>> +		kvm_free_memslots(kvm, rcu_access_pointer(kvm->memslots[i]));
> 
> should these rather be rcu_dereference_protected ?

Yes, I think so.

Paolo

>>  	kvm_arch_free_vm(kvm);
>>  	mmdrop(current->mm);
>>  	return ERR_PTR(r);
>> @@ -753,7 +753,7 @@ static void kvm_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
>>  	kvm_arch_destroy_vm(kvm);
>>  	kvm_destroy_devices(kvm);
>>  	for (i = 0; i < KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM; i++)
>> -		kvm_free_memslots(kvm, kvm->memslots[i]);
>> +		kvm_free_memslots(kvm, rcu_access_pointer(kvm->memslots[i]));
>>  	cleanup_srcu_struct(&kvm->irq_srcu);
>>  	cleanup_srcu_struct(&kvm->srcu);
>>  	kvm_arch_free_vm(kvm);
>>
>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index bcd37b8..7c32905 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -390,7 +390,7 @@  struct kvm {
 	spinlock_t mmu_lock;
 	struct mutex slots_lock;
 	struct mm_struct *mm; /* userspace tied to this vm */
-	struct kvm_memslots *memslots[KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM];
+	struct kvm_memslots __rcu *memslots[KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM];
 	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpus[KVM_MAX_VCPUS];
 
 	/*
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index fc2d583..d4418fa 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -707,7 +707,7 @@  static struct kvm *kvm_create_vm(unsigned long type)
 	for (i = 0; i < KVM_NR_BUSES; i++)
 		kfree(kvm->buses[i]);
 	for (i = 0; i < KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM; i++)
-		kvm_free_memslots(kvm, kvm->memslots[i]);
+		kvm_free_memslots(kvm, rcu_access_pointer(kvm->memslots[i]));
 	kvm_arch_free_vm(kvm);
 	mmdrop(current->mm);
 	return ERR_PTR(r);
@@ -753,7 +753,7 @@  static void kvm_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
 	kvm_arch_destroy_vm(kvm);
 	kvm_destroy_devices(kvm);
 	for (i = 0; i < KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM; i++)
-		kvm_free_memslots(kvm, kvm->memslots[i]);
+		kvm_free_memslots(kvm, rcu_access_pointer(kvm->memslots[i]));
 	cleanup_srcu_struct(&kvm->irq_srcu);
 	cleanup_srcu_struct(&kvm->srcu);
 	kvm_arch_free_vm(kvm);