| Message ID | 1e034d9f-0e21-637d-c0e6-09d1b7e95027@sandeen.net (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Headers | show |
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 11:39:19AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > add_remote_vals assumes that it can subtract blocksize > from each block that it processes, but with CRCs, there > is a header on each block, so the assumption that each > block consumes $BLOCKSIZE of the value length is incorrect. > > This causes us to stop adding remote blocks too soon, and > the missed blocks do not get obfuscated. > > Fix this by accounting for the header size as appropriate, > depending on whether or not we have a CRC filesystem. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> > --- > Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> > V2: Use helper macro, don't send mp as arg (it's a global (!)) > > diff --git a/db/metadump.c b/db/metadump.c > index 96641e0..f60bd32 100644 > --- a/db/metadump.c > +++ b/db/metadump.c > @@ -1609,7 +1609,7 @@ add_remote_vals( > attr_data.remote_vals[attr_data.remote_val_count] = blockidx; > attr_data.remote_val_count++; > blockidx++; > - length -= mp->m_sb.sb_blocksize; > + length -= XFS_ATTR3_RMT_BUF_SPACE(mp, mp->m_sb.sb_blocksize); > } > > if (attr_data.remote_val_count >= MAX_REMOTE_VALS) { > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/db/metadump.c b/db/metadump.c index 96641e0..f60bd32 100644 --- a/db/metadump.c +++ b/db/metadump.c @@ -1609,7 +1609,7 @@ add_remote_vals( attr_data.remote_vals[attr_data.remote_val_count] = blockidx; attr_data.remote_val_count++; blockidx++; - length -= mp->m_sb.sb_blocksize; + length -= XFS_ATTR3_RMT_BUF_SPACE(mp, mp->m_sb.sb_blocksize); } if (attr_data.remote_val_count >= MAX_REMOTE_VALS) {
add_remote_vals assumes that it can subtract blocksize from each block that it processes, but with CRCs, there is a header on each block, so the assumption that each block consumes $BLOCKSIZE of the value length is incorrect. This causes us to stop adding remote blocks too soon, and the missed blocks do not get obfuscated. Fix this by accounting for the header size as appropriate, depending on whether or not we have a CRC filesystem. Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> --- V2: Use helper macro, don't send mp as arg (it's a global (!)) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html