diff mbox

[V5,1/7] blk-mq: issue rq directly in blk_mq_request_bypass_insert()

Message ID 20170930102720.30219-2-ming.lei@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Delegated to: Mike Snitzer
Headers show

Commit Message

Ming Lei Sept. 30, 2017, 10:27 a.m. UTC 
With issuing rq directly in blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(),
we can:

1) avoid to acquire hctx->lock.

2) the dispatch result can be returned to dm-rq, so that dm-rq
can use this information for improving I/O performance, and
part2 of this patchset will do that.

3) Also the following patch for improving sequential I/O performance
uses hctx->dispatch to decide if hctx is busy, so we need to avoid
to add rq into hctx->dispatch direclty.

There will be another patch in which we move blk_mq_request_direct_insert()
out since it is better for dm-rq to deal with this situation, and
the IO scheduler is actually in dm-rq side.

Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
 block/blk-core.c   |  3 +--
 block/blk-mq.c     | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 block/blk-mq.h     |  2 +-
 drivers/md/dm-rq.c |  2 +-
 4 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

Comments

Christoph Hellwig Oct. 3, 2017, 8:58 a.m. UTC | #1 
This patch does two many things at once and needs a split. I also
don't really understand why it's in this series and not your dm-mpath
performance one.

> +static void blk_mq_request_direct_insert(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> +					 struct request *rq)
> +{
> +	spin_lock(&hctx->lock);
> +	list_add_tail(&rq->queuelist, &hctx->dispatch);
> +	spin_unlock(&hctx->lock);
> +
> +	blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx, false);
> +}

Why doesn't this share code with blk_mq_sched_bypass_insert?

>  /*
>   * Should only be used carefully, when the caller knows we want to
>   * bypass a potential IO scheduler on the target device.
>   */
> -void blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(struct request *rq)
> +blk_status_t blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(struct request *rq)
>  {
>  	struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx = rq->mq_ctx;
>  	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = blk_mq_map_queue(rq->q, ctx->cpu);
> +	blk_qc_t cookie;
> +	blk_status_t ret;
>  
> -	spin_lock(&hctx->lock);
> -	list_add_tail(&rq->queuelist, &hctx->dispatch);
> -	spin_unlock(&hctx->lock);
> -
> -	blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx, false);
> +	ret = blk_mq_try_issue_directly(hctx, rq, &cookie, true);
> +	if (ret == BLK_STS_RESOURCE)
> +		blk_mq_request_direct_insert(hctx, rq);
> +	return ret;

If you actually insert the request on BLK_STS_RESOURCE why do you
pass the error on?  In general BLK_STS_RESOURCE indicates a failure
to issue.

> +/*
> + * 'dispatch_only' means we only try to dispatch it out, and
> + * don't deal with dispatch failure if BLK_STS_RESOURCE or
> + * BLK_STS_IOERR happens.
> + */
> +static blk_status_t __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> +		struct request *rq, blk_qc_t *cookie, bool may_sleep,
> +		bool dispatch_only)

This dispatch_only argument that completely changes behavior is a
nightmare.  Try to find a way to have a low-level helper that
always behaves as if dispatch_only is set, and then build another
helper that actually issues/completes around it.

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
Ming Lei Oct. 3, 2017, 1:39 p.m. UTC | #2 
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 01:58:50AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> This patch does two many things at once and needs a split. I also
> don't really understand why it's in this series and not your dm-mpath
> performance one.

Because the following patches only set hctx as busy after
BLK_STS_RESOURCE is returned from .queue_rq(), then add the
rq into hctx->dispatch.

But commit 157f377beb71(block: directly insert blk-mq request from
blk_insert_cloned_request()) just inserts rq into hctx->dispatch
directly, then we can't think hctx as busy any more if there are
requests in hctx->dispatch. That said the commit(157f377beb71)
makes the busy detection approach not working any more.

>
> > +static void blk_mq_request_direct_insert(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> > +					 struct request *rq)
> > +{
> > +	spin_lock(&hctx->lock);
> > +	list_add_tail(&rq->queuelist, &hctx->dispatch);
> > +	spin_unlock(&hctx->lock);
> > +
> > +	blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx, false);
> > +}
> 
> Why doesn't this share code with blk_mq_sched_bypass_insert?

It actually shares the code as this function is called
by blk_mq_request_bypass_insert().

> 
> >  /*
> >   * Should only be used carefully, when the caller knows we want to
> >   * bypass a potential IO scheduler on the target device.
> >   */
> > -void blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(struct request *rq)
> > +blk_status_t blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(struct request *rq)
> >  {
> >  	struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx = rq->mq_ctx;
> >  	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = blk_mq_map_queue(rq->q, ctx->cpu);
> > +	blk_qc_t cookie;
> > +	blk_status_t ret;
> >  
> > -	spin_lock(&hctx->lock);
> > -	list_add_tail(&rq->queuelist, &hctx->dispatch);
> > -	spin_unlock(&hctx->lock);
> > -
> > -	blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx, false);
> > +	ret = blk_mq_try_issue_directly(hctx, rq, &cookie, true);
> > +	if (ret == BLK_STS_RESOURCE)
> > +		blk_mq_request_direct_insert(hctx, rq);
> > +	return ret;
> 
> If you actually insert the request on BLK_STS_RESOURCE why do you
> pass the error on?  In general BLK_STS_RESOURCE indicates a failure
> to issue.

OK, I will change it into BLK_STS_OK and switch it back in
the dm-rq patches.

> 
> > +/*
> > + * 'dispatch_only' means we only try to dispatch it out, and
> > + * don't deal with dispatch failure if BLK_STS_RESOURCE or
> > + * BLK_STS_IOERR happens.
> > + */
> > +static blk_status_t __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> > +		struct request *rq, blk_qc_t *cookie, bool may_sleep,
> > +		bool dispatch_only)
> 
> This dispatch_only argument that completely changes behavior is a
> nightmare.  Try to find a way to have a low-level helper that
> always behaves as if dispatch_only is set, and then build another
> helper that actually issues/completes around it.

OK, I will try to work towards that way.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 048be4aa6024..4c7fd2231145 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -2350,8 +2350,7 @@  blk_status_t blk_insert_cloned_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *
 		 * bypass a potential scheduler on the bottom device for
 		 * insert.
 		 */
-		blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq);
-		return BLK_STS_OK;
+		return blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq);
 	}
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(q->queue_lock, flags);
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 98a18609755e..d1b9fb539eba 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ 
 
 static void blk_mq_poll_stats_start(struct request_queue *q);
 static void blk_mq_poll_stats_fn(struct blk_stat_callback *cb);
+static blk_status_t blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
+		struct request *rq, blk_qc_t *cookie, bool dispatch_only);
 
 static int blk_mq_poll_stats_bkt(const struct request *rq)
 {
@@ -1401,20 +1403,31 @@  void __blk_mq_insert_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *rq,
 	blk_mq_hctx_mark_pending(hctx, ctx);
 }
 
+static void blk_mq_request_direct_insert(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
+					 struct request *rq)
+{
+	spin_lock(&hctx->lock);
+	list_add_tail(&rq->queuelist, &hctx->dispatch);
+	spin_unlock(&hctx->lock);
+
+	blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx, false);
+}
+
 /*
  * Should only be used carefully, when the caller knows we want to
  * bypass a potential IO scheduler on the target device.
  */
-void blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(struct request *rq)
+blk_status_t blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(struct request *rq)
 {
 	struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx = rq->mq_ctx;
 	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = blk_mq_map_queue(rq->q, ctx->cpu);
+	blk_qc_t cookie;
+	blk_status_t ret;
 
-	spin_lock(&hctx->lock);
-	list_add_tail(&rq->queuelist, &hctx->dispatch);
-	spin_unlock(&hctx->lock);
-
-	blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx, false);
+	ret = blk_mq_try_issue_directly(hctx, rq, &cookie, true);
+	if (ret == BLK_STS_RESOURCE)
+		blk_mq_request_direct_insert(hctx, rq);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 void blk_mq_insert_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx,
@@ -1527,9 +1540,14 @@  static blk_qc_t request_to_qc_t(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *rq)
 	return blk_tag_to_qc_t(rq->internal_tag, hctx->queue_num, true);
 }
 
-static void __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
-					struct request *rq,
-					blk_qc_t *cookie, bool may_sleep)
+/*
+ * 'dispatch_only' means we only try to dispatch it out, and
+ * don't deal with dispatch failure if BLK_STS_RESOURCE or
+ * BLK_STS_IOERR happens.
+ */
+static blk_status_t __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
+		struct request *rq, blk_qc_t *cookie, bool may_sleep,
+		bool dispatch_only)
 {
 	struct request_queue *q = rq->q;
 	struct blk_mq_queue_data bd = {
@@ -1537,7 +1555,7 @@  static void __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
 		.last = true,
 	};
 	blk_qc_t new_cookie;
-	blk_status_t ret;
+	blk_status_t ret = BLK_STS_OK;
 	bool run_queue = true;
 
 	/* RCU or SRCU read lock is needed before checking quiesced flag */
@@ -1546,9 +1564,10 @@  static void __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
 		goto insert;
 	}
 
-	if (q->elevator)
+	if (q->elevator && !dispatch_only)
 		goto insert;
 
+	ret = BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
 	if (!blk_mq_get_driver_tag(rq, NULL, false))
 		goto insert;
 
@@ -1563,26 +1582,32 @@  static void __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
 	switch (ret) {
 	case BLK_STS_OK:
 		*cookie = new_cookie;
-		return;
+		return ret;
 	case BLK_STS_RESOURCE:
 		__blk_mq_requeue_request(rq);
 		goto insert;
 	default:
 		*cookie = BLK_QC_T_NONE;
-		blk_mq_end_request(rq, ret);
-		return;
+		if (!dispatch_only)
+			blk_mq_end_request(rq, ret);
+		return ret;
 	}
 
 insert:
-	blk_mq_sched_insert_request(rq, false, run_queue, false, may_sleep);
+	if (!dispatch_only)
+		blk_mq_sched_insert_request(rq, false, run_queue, false, may_sleep);
+	return ret;
 }
 
-static void blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
-		struct request *rq, blk_qc_t *cookie)
+static blk_status_t blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
+		struct request *rq, blk_qc_t *cookie, bool dispatch_only)
 {
+	blk_status_t ret;
+
 	if (!(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING)) {
 		rcu_read_lock();
-		__blk_mq_try_issue_directly(hctx, rq, cookie, false);
+		ret = __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(hctx, rq, cookie, false,
+				dispatch_only);
 		rcu_read_unlock();
 	} else {
 		unsigned int srcu_idx;
@@ -1590,9 +1615,12 @@  static void blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
 		might_sleep();
 
 		srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(hctx->queue_rq_srcu);
-		__blk_mq_try_issue_directly(hctx, rq, cookie, true);
+		ret = __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(hctx, rq, cookie, true,
+				dispatch_only);
 		srcu_read_unlock(hctx->queue_rq_srcu, srcu_idx);
 	}
+
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static blk_qc_t blk_mq_make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
@@ -1697,12 +1725,12 @@  static blk_qc_t blk_mq_make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
 			data.hctx = blk_mq_map_queue(q,
 					same_queue_rq->mq_ctx->cpu);
 			blk_mq_try_issue_directly(data.hctx, same_queue_rq,
-					&cookie);
+					&cookie, false);
 		}
 	} else if (q->nr_hw_queues > 1 && is_sync) {
 		blk_mq_put_ctx(data.ctx);
 		blk_mq_bio_to_request(rq, bio);
-		blk_mq_try_issue_directly(data.hctx, rq, &cookie);
+		blk_mq_try_issue_directly(data.hctx, rq, &cookie, false);
 	} else if (q->elevator) {
 		blk_mq_put_ctx(data.ctx);
 		blk_mq_bio_to_request(rq, bio);
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.h b/block/blk-mq.h
index ef15b3414da5..61aecf398a4b 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.h
+++ b/block/blk-mq.h
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@  int blk_mq_alloc_rqs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
  */
 void __blk_mq_insert_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *rq,
 				bool at_head);
-void blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(struct request *rq);
+blk_status_t blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(struct request *rq);
 void blk_mq_insert_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx,
 				struct list_head *list);
 
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-rq.c b/drivers/md/dm-rq.c
index 29b237dcc39d..f5e2b6967357 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-rq.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-rq.c
@@ -404,7 +404,7 @@  static void dm_dispatch_clone_request(struct request *clone, struct request *rq)
 
 	clone->start_time = jiffies;
 	r = blk_insert_cloned_request(clone->q, clone);
-	if (r)
+	if (r != BLK_STS_OK && r != BLK_STS_RESOURCE)
 		/* must complete clone in terms of original request */
 		dm_complete_request(rq, r);
 }