| Message ID | 1507009987-8746-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h index 339e73742e73..13dab191a23e 100644 --- a/include/linux/fs.h +++ b/include/linux/fs.h @@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ struct address_space { unsigned long flags; /* error bits */ spinlock_t private_lock; /* for use by the address_space */ gfp_t gfp_mask; /* implicit gfp mask for allocations */ - struct list_head private_list; /* ditto */ + struct list_head private_list; /* for use by the address_space */ void *private_data; /* ditto */ errseq_t wb_err; } __attribute__((aligned(sizeof(long)))) __randomize_layout;
Before commit 9c5d760b8d22 ("mm: split gfp_mask and mapping flags into separate fields") the private_* fields of struct adrress_space were grouped together and using "ditto" in comments describing the last fields was correct. With introduction of gpf_mask between private_lock and private_list "ditto" references the wrong description. Fix it by using the elaborate description. Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- include/linux/fs.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)