mbox series

[v3,0/2] Add period size constraint for Atom Chromebook

Message ID 1596198365-10105-1-git-send-email-brent.lu@intel.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series Add period size constraint for Atom Chromebook | expand

Message

Brent Lu July 31, 2020, 12:26 p.m. UTC
Two different constraints are implemented: one is in platform's CPU
DAI to enforce the period to be multiple of 1ms to align with firmware
design. The other is in Atom Chromebook's machine driver to use 240 as
period size which is selected by google.


Changes since v1:
-Add comma at the end of media_period_size array declaration.

Changes since v2:
-Use snd_pcm_hw_constraint_step to enforce the 1ms period.


Brent Lu (1):
  ASoC: intel: atom: Add period size constraint

Yu-Hsuan Hsu (1):
  ASoC: Intel: Add period size constraint on strago board

 sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-mfld-platform-pcm.c | 11 +++++++++++
 sound/soc/intel/boards/cht_bsw_max98090_ti.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
 sound/soc/intel/boards/cht_bsw_rt5645.c      | 14 +++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Mark Brown Aug. 21, 2020, 4:40 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 20:26:03 +0800, Brent Lu wrote:
> Two different constraints are implemented: one is in platform's CPU
> DAI to enforce the period to be multiple of 1ms to align with firmware
> design. The other is in Atom Chromebook's machine driver to use 240 as
> period size which is selected by google.
> 
> 
> Changes since v1:
> -Add comma at the end of media_period_size array declaration.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: intel: atom: Add period size constraint
      commit: 5e7820e369248f880767c4c4079b414529bc2125

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark