[0/8] soundwire: remove platform devices, add SOF interfaces

Message

Pierre-Louis Bossart Feb. 27, 2020, 10:31 p.m. UTC

The first two patches were already reviewed by Greg KH in an earlier
RFC. Since I only cleaned-up the error handling flow and removed an
unnecessary wrapper, I took the liberty of adding Greg's Reviewed-by
tag for these two patches.

The rest of the patches implement the interfaces required for the SOF
driver (interrupts handled with a single handler, PCI wakes and
sharing of _ADR information to select a machine driver).

When this patchset is merged, a tag will need to be shared with Mark
Brown so that we can provide the SOF patches to the ASoC tree and
enable SoundWire in builds for Intel platforms.

Bard Liao (2):
  soundwire: intel/cadence: merge Soundwire interrupt handlers/threads
  soundwire: intel_init: save Slave(s) _ADR info in sdw_intel_ctx

Pierre-Louis Bossart (5):
  soundwire: bus_type: add master_device/driver support
  soundwire: intel: transition to sdw_master_device/driver support
  soundwire: intel_init: add implementation of sdw_intel_enable_irq()
  soundwire: intel_init: use EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS
  soundwire: intel: add helpers for link power down and shim wake

Rander Wang (1):
  soundwire: intel: add wake interrupt support

 drivers/soundwire/Makefile         |   2 +-
 drivers/soundwire/bus_type.c       | 141 ++++++++++-
 drivers/soundwire/cadence_master.c |  18 +-
 drivers/soundwire/cadence_master.h |   4 +
 drivers/soundwire/intel.c          | 182 +++++++++++---
 drivers/soundwire/intel.h          |  12 +-
 drivers/soundwire/intel_init.c     | 365 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
 drivers/soundwire/master.c         | 100 ++++++++
 drivers/soundwire/slave.c          |   7 +-
 include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h      |  76 ++++++
 include/linux/soundwire/sdw_type.h |  36 ++-
 11 files changed, 819 insertions(+), 124 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/soundwire/master.c

Comments

Greg Kroah-Hartman Feb. 28, 2020, 7:32 a.m. UTC | #1

On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 04:31:58PM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> The first two patches were already reviewed by Greg KH in an earlier
> RFC. Since I only cleaned-up the error handling flow and removed an
> unnecessary wrapper, I took the liberty of adding Greg's Reviewed-by
> tag for these two patches.

That is fine, they still look sane to me :)