[0/3] ASoC: SOF: debug: cleanups

Message

Pierre-Louis Bossart March 15, 2021, 4:39 p.m. UTC

cleanups of allocation and error handling

Guennadi Liakhovetski (3):
  ASoC: SOF: fix debugfs initialisation error handling
  ASoC: SOF: only allocate debugfs cache buffers for IPC flood entries
  ASoC: SOF: remove superfluous NULL check in debugfs read

 sound/soc/sof/core.c  |  5 +++--
 sound/soc/sof/debug.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Comments

Mark Brown March 16, 2021, 5:59 p.m. UTC | #1

On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 11:39:29 -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> cleanups of allocation and error handling
> 
> Guennadi Liakhovetski (3):
>   ASoC: SOF: fix debugfs initialisation error handling
>   ASoC: SOF: only allocate debugfs cache buffers for IPC flood entries
>   ASoC: SOF: remove superfluous NULL check in debugfs read
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/3] ASoC: SOF: fix debugfs initialisation error handling
      commit: 11fd6d8e097b5b179ea445e0206aaefc47e62845
[2/3] ASoC: SOF: only allocate debugfs cache buffers for IPC flood entries
      commit: 72c35856b5edc3f734be5699e9f6737190a1d897
[3/3] ASoC: SOF: remove superfluous NULL check in debugfs read
      commit: 97f53046d746bef513d5fbaac53eedb011968407

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark