mbox series

[-next,0/2] Fix unbalanced pm_runtime_enable in error handle

Message ID 20210618141104.105047-1-zhangqilong3@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series Fix unbalanced pm_runtime_enable in error handle | expand

Message

Zhang Qilong June 18, 2021, 2:11 p.m. UTC
This two patches fixed the unbalanced PM disable depth. It could
avoid pm_runtime implementation complains when removing and probing
again the driver.

Zhang Qilong (2):
  ASoC: mediatek: mt8192:Fix Unbalanced pm_runtime_enable in
    mt8192_afe_pcm_dev_probe
  ASoC: mediatek: mt8183: Fix Unbalanced pm_runtime_enable in
    mt8183_afe_pcm_dev_probe

 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8183/mt8183-afe-pcm.c | 43 ++++++++++++++--------
 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-afe-pcm.c | 27 +++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

Comments

Mark Brown July 12, 2021, 10:46 a.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 22:11:02 +0800, Zhang Qilong wrote:
> This two patches fixed the unbalanced PM disable depth. It could
> avoid pm_runtime implementation complains when removing and probing
> again the driver.
> 
> Zhang Qilong (2):
>   ASoC: mediatek: mt8192:Fix Unbalanced pm_runtime_enable in
>     mt8192_afe_pcm_dev_probe
>   ASoC: mediatek: mt8183: Fix Unbalanced pm_runtime_enable in
>     mt8183_afe_pcm_dev_probe
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/2] ASoC: mediatek: mt8192:Fix Unbalanced pm_runtime_enable in mt8192_afe_pcm_dev_probe
      commit: 2af2f861edd21c1456ef7dbec52122ce1b581568
[2/2] ASoC: mediatek: mt8183: Fix Unbalanced pm_runtime_enable in mt8183_afe_pcm_dev_probe
      commit: 19f479c37f76e926a6c0bec974a4d09826e32fc6

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark