Message ID | 87wmf4269n.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | ASoC: remove disable_route_checks | expand |
On 1/9/2025 1:13 AM, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > > Hi Mark, Intel test team > > ASoC framwork has disable_route_checks flag. Intel is the last user of it, > but it seems it exists in dead code. So we can remove it. > > But I can't test it. This patch needs Intel team's Tested-by. > Not sure what's there to test, when it removes unused code ;). Still I did quick test, current solution (avs driver) works fine with regards to core/topology changes. Tested-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, 09 Jan 2025 00:13:56 +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > ASoC framwork has disable_route_checks flag. Intel is the last user of it, > but it seems it exists in dead code. So we can remove it. > > But I can't test it. This patch needs Intel team's Tested-by. > > Kuninori Morimoto (2): > ASoC: intel: remove disable_route_checks > ASoC: remove disable_route_checks > > [...] Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next Thanks! [1/2] ASoC: intel: remove disable_route_checks commit: 61aff2da3e63a43f22e60aa1bc57026ce07d189e [2/2] ASoC: remove disable_route_checks commit: 9c0e29b9957e407af6197ff1fb48f365a9b0c248 All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark