| Message ID | cover.1585575111.git.michal.simek@xilinx.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | powerpc: Remove support for ppc405/440 Xilinx platforms | expand |
Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> writes: > Hi, > > recently we wanted to update xilinx intc driver and we found that function > which we wanted to remove is still wired by ancient Xilinx PowerPC > platforms. Here is the thread about it. > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/48d3232d-0f1d-42ea-3109-f44bbabfa2e8@xilinx.com/ > > I have been talking about it internally and there is no interest in these > platforms and it is also orphan for quite a long time. None is really > running/testing these platforms regularly that's why I think it makes sense > to remove them also with drivers which are specific to this platform. > > U-Boot support was removed in 2017 without anybody complain about it > https://github.com/Xilinx/u-boot-xlnx/commit/98f705c9cefdfdba62c069821bbba10273a0a8ed > > Based on current ppc/next. > > If anyone has any objection about it, please let me know. Thanks for taking the time to find all this code and remove it. I'm not going to take this series for v5.7, it was posted too close to the merge window, and doing so wouldn't give people much time to object, especially given people are distracted at the moment. I'm happy to take it for v5.8, assuming there's no major objections. cheers
On 01. 04. 20 4:07, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> writes: >> Hi, >> >> recently we wanted to update xilinx intc driver and we found that function >> which we wanted to remove is still wired by ancient Xilinx PowerPC >> platforms. Here is the thread about it. >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/48d3232d-0f1d-42ea-3109-f44bbabfa2e8@xilinx.com/ >> >> I have been talking about it internally and there is no interest in these >> platforms and it is also orphan for quite a long time. None is really >> running/testing these platforms regularly that's why I think it makes sense >> to remove them also with drivers which are specific to this platform. >> >> U-Boot support was removed in 2017 without anybody complain about it >> https://github.com/Xilinx/u-boot-xlnx/commit/98f705c9cefdfdba62c069821bbba10273a0a8ed >> >> Based on current ppc/next. >> >> If anyone has any objection about it, please let me know. > > Thanks for taking the time to find all this code and remove it. > > I'm not going to take this series for v5.7, it was posted too close to > the merge window, and doing so wouldn't give people much time to object, > especially given people are distracted at the moment. > > I'm happy to take it for v5.8, assuming there's no major objections. Sure. Just to let you know Christophe Leroy included this patch in his series about ppc405 removal. It should be the same. If you don't want to take that alsa patch I can send it separately and this patch can be taken from his series. I don't really mind but please let me know what way you prefer. Thanks, Michal
Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> writes: > On 01. 04. 20 4:07, Michael Ellerman wrote: >> Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> writes: >>> Hi, >>> >>> recently we wanted to update xilinx intc driver and we found that function >>> which we wanted to remove is still wired by ancient Xilinx PowerPC >>> platforms. Here is the thread about it. >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/48d3232d-0f1d-42ea-3109-f44bbabfa2e8@xilinx.com/ >>> >>> I have been talking about it internally and there is no interest in these >>> platforms and it is also orphan for quite a long time. None is really >>> running/testing these platforms regularly that's why I think it makes sense >>> to remove them also with drivers which are specific to this platform. >>> >>> U-Boot support was removed in 2017 without anybody complain about it >>> https://github.com/Xilinx/u-boot-xlnx/commit/98f705c9cefdfdba62c069821bbba10273a0a8ed >>> >>> Based on current ppc/next. >>> >>> If anyone has any objection about it, please let me know. >> >> Thanks for taking the time to find all this code and remove it. >> >> I'm not going to take this series for v5.7, it was posted too close to >> the merge window, and doing so wouldn't give people much time to object, >> especially given people are distracted at the moment. >> >> I'm happy to take it for v5.8, assuming there's no major objections. > > Sure. Just to let you know Christophe Leroy included this patch in his > series about ppc405 removal. It should be the same. > > If you don't want to take that alsa patch I can send it separately and > this patch can be taken from his series. I don't really mind but please > let me know what way you prefer. It's better to keep it all together, so I'm happy take the alsa patch as well, it's already been acked. cheers
On Wed, 01 Apr 2020 12:35:16 +0200, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> writes: > > On 01. 04. 20 4:07, Michael Ellerman wrote: > >> Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> writes: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> recently we wanted to update xilinx intc driver and we found that function > >>> which we wanted to remove is still wired by ancient Xilinx PowerPC > >>> platforms. Here is the thread about it. > >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/48d3232d-0f1d-42ea-3109-f44bbabfa2e8@xilinx.com/ > >>> > >>> I have been talking about it internally and there is no interest in these > >>> platforms and it is also orphan for quite a long time. None is really > >>> running/testing these platforms regularly that's why I think it makes sense > >>> to remove them also with drivers which are specific to this platform. > >>> > >>> U-Boot support was removed in 2017 without anybody complain about it > >>> https://github.com/Xilinx/u-boot-xlnx/commit/98f705c9cefdfdba62c069821bbba10273a0a8ed > >>> > >>> Based on current ppc/next. > >>> > >>> If anyone has any objection about it, please let me know. > >> > >> Thanks for taking the time to find all this code and remove it. > >> > >> I'm not going to take this series for v5.7, it was posted too close to > >> the merge window, and doing so wouldn't give people much time to object, > >> especially given people are distracted at the moment. > >> > >> I'm happy to take it for v5.8, assuming there's no major objections. > > > > Sure. Just to let you know Christophe Leroy included this patch in his > > series about ppc405 removal. It should be the same. > > > > If you don't want to take that alsa patch I can send it separately and > > this patch can be taken from his series. I don't really mind but please > > let me know what way you prefer. > > It's better to keep it all together, so I'm happy take the alsa patch as > well, it's already been acked. Sure, please go ahead. thanks, Takashi
On 01. 04. 20 12:38, Takashi Iwai wrote: > On Wed, 01 Apr 2020 12:35:16 +0200, > Michael Ellerman wrote: >> >> Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> writes: >>> On 01. 04. 20 4:07, Michael Ellerman wrote: >>>> Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> writes: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> recently we wanted to update xilinx intc driver and we found that function >>>>> which we wanted to remove is still wired by ancient Xilinx PowerPC >>>>> platforms. Here is the thread about it. >>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/48d3232d-0f1d-42ea-3109-f44bbabfa2e8@xilinx.com/ >>>>> >>>>> I have been talking about it internally and there is no interest in these >>>>> platforms and it is also orphan for quite a long time. None is really >>>>> running/testing these platforms regularly that's why I think it makes sense >>>>> to remove them also with drivers which are specific to this platform. >>>>> >>>>> U-Boot support was removed in 2017 without anybody complain about it >>>>> https://github.com/Xilinx/u-boot-xlnx/commit/98f705c9cefdfdba62c069821bbba10273a0a8ed >>>>> >>>>> Based on current ppc/next. >>>>> >>>>> If anyone has any objection about it, please let me know. >>>> >>>> Thanks for taking the time to find all this code and remove it. >>>> >>>> I'm not going to take this series for v5.7, it was posted too close to >>>> the merge window, and doing so wouldn't give people much time to object, >>>> especially given people are distracted at the moment. >>>> >>>> I'm happy to take it for v5.8, assuming there's no major objections. >>> >>> Sure. Just to let you know Christophe Leroy included this patch in his >>> series about ppc405 removal. It should be the same. >>> >>> If you don't want to take that alsa patch I can send it separately and >>> this patch can be taken from his series. I don't really mind but please >>> let me know what way you prefer. >> >> It's better to keep it all together, so I'm happy take the alsa patch as >> well, it's already been acked. > > Sure, please go ahead. g8. Thanks, Michal
Hi Michael, On 01. 04. 20 13:30, Michal Simek wrote: > On 01. 04. 20 12:38, Takashi Iwai wrote: >> On Wed, 01 Apr 2020 12:35:16 +0200, >> Michael Ellerman wrote: >>> >>> Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> writes: >>>> On 01. 04. 20 4:07, Michael Ellerman wrote: >>>>> Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> writes: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> recently we wanted to update xilinx intc driver and we found that function >>>>>> which we wanted to remove is still wired by ancient Xilinx PowerPC >>>>>> platforms. Here is the thread about it. >>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/48d3232d-0f1d-42ea-3109-f44bbabfa2e8@xilinx.com/ >>>>>> >>>>>> I have been talking about it internally and there is no interest in these >>>>>> platforms and it is also orphan for quite a long time. None is really >>>>>> running/testing these platforms regularly that's why I think it makes sense >>>>>> to remove them also with drivers which are specific to this platform. >>>>>> >>>>>> U-Boot support was removed in 2017 without anybody complain about it >>>>>> https://github.com/Xilinx/u-boot-xlnx/commit/98f705c9cefdfdba62c069821bbba10273a0a8ed >>>>>> >>>>>> Based on current ppc/next. >>>>>> >>>>>> If anyone has any objection about it, please let me know. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for taking the time to find all this code and remove it. >>>>> >>>>> I'm not going to take this series for v5.7, it was posted too close to >>>>> the merge window, and doing so wouldn't give people much time to object, >>>>> especially given people are distracted at the moment. >>>>> >>>>> I'm happy to take it for v5.8, assuming there's no major objections. >>>> >>>> Sure. Just to let you know Christophe Leroy included this patch in his >>>> series about ppc405 removal. It should be the same. >>>> >>>> If you don't want to take that alsa patch I can send it separately and >>>> this patch can be taken from his series. I don't really mind but please >>>> let me know what way you prefer. >>> >>> It's better to keep it all together, so I'm happy take the alsa patch as >>> well, it's already been acked. >> >> Sure, please go ahead. > > > g8. Can you please take this series? I know that there is v5 from Christophe which has this 1/2 as 1/13. But I need this alsa patch too and I would like to close this because it is around for almost 2 months and none raised a concern about removing just these Xilinx platforms. Thanks, Michal
Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> writes: > Hi Michael, > > On 01. 04. 20 13:30, Michal Simek wrote: >> On 01. 04. 20 12:38, Takashi Iwai wrote: >>> On Wed, 01 Apr 2020 12:35:16 +0200, >>> Michael Ellerman wrote: >>>> >>>> Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> writes: >>>>> On 01. 04. 20 4:07, Michael Ellerman wrote: >>>>>> Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> writes: >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> recently we wanted to update xilinx intc driver and we found that function >>>>>>> which we wanted to remove is still wired by ancient Xilinx PowerPC >>>>>>> platforms. Here is the thread about it. >>>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/48d3232d-0f1d-42ea-3109-f44bbabfa2e8@xilinx.com/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have been talking about it internally and there is no interest in these >>>>>>> platforms and it is also orphan for quite a long time. None is really >>>>>>> running/testing these platforms regularly that's why I think it makes sense >>>>>>> to remove them also with drivers which are specific to this platform. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> U-Boot support was removed in 2017 without anybody complain about it >>>>>>> https://github.com/Xilinx/u-boot-xlnx/commit/98f705c9cefdfdba62c069821bbba10273a0a8ed >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Based on current ppc/next. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If anyone has any objection about it, please let me know. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for taking the time to find all this code and remove it. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm not going to take this series for v5.7, it was posted too close to >>>>>> the merge window, and doing so wouldn't give people much time to object, >>>>>> especially given people are distracted at the moment. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm happy to take it for v5.8, assuming there's no major objections. >>>>> >>>>> Sure. Just to let you know Christophe Leroy included this patch in his >>>>> series about ppc405 removal. It should be the same. >>>>> >>>>> If you don't want to take that alsa patch I can send it separately and >>>>> this patch can be taken from his series. I don't really mind but please >>>>> let me know what way you prefer. >>>> >>>> It's better to keep it all together, so I'm happy take the alsa patch as >>>> well, it's already been acked. > > Can you please take this series? I know that there is v5 from Christophe > which has this 1/2 as 1/13. But I need this alsa patch too and I would > like to close this because it is around for almost 2 months and none > raised a concern about removing just these Xilinx platforms. Sorry I meant to reply to your last mail. I have Christophe's series in my testing branch, planning for it to be in v5.8. Even if the rest of his series doesn't make it for some reason, as you say the Xilinx removal is uncontroversial so I'll keep that in. I forgot about the sound patch, I'll pick that up as well. cheers
Hi Michael, On 26. 05. 20 15:44, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> writes: >> Hi Michael, >> >> On 01. 04. 20 13:30, Michal Simek wrote: >>> On 01. 04. 20 12:38, Takashi Iwai wrote: >>>> On Wed, 01 Apr 2020 12:35:16 +0200, >>>> Michael Ellerman wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> writes: >>>>>> On 01. 04. 20 4:07, Michael Ellerman wrote: >>>>>>> Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> writes: >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> recently we wanted to update xilinx intc driver and we found that function >>>>>>>> which we wanted to remove is still wired by ancient Xilinx PowerPC >>>>>>>> platforms. Here is the thread about it. >>>>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/48d3232d-0f1d-42ea-3109-f44bbabfa2e8@xilinx.com/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have been talking about it internally and there is no interest in these >>>>>>>> platforms and it is also orphan for quite a long time. None is really >>>>>>>> running/testing these platforms regularly that's why I think it makes sense >>>>>>>> to remove them also with drivers which are specific to this platform. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> U-Boot support was removed in 2017 without anybody complain about it >>>>>>>> https://github.com/Xilinx/u-boot-xlnx/commit/98f705c9cefdfdba62c069821bbba10273a0a8ed >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Based on current ppc/next. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If anyone has any objection about it, please let me know. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for taking the time to find all this code and remove it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm not going to take this series for v5.7, it was posted too close to >>>>>>> the merge window, and doing so wouldn't give people much time to object, >>>>>>> especially given people are distracted at the moment. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm happy to take it for v5.8, assuming there's no major objections. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sure. Just to let you know Christophe Leroy included this patch in his >>>>>> series about ppc405 removal. It should be the same. >>>>>> >>>>>> If you don't want to take that alsa patch I can send it separately and >>>>>> this patch can be taken from his series. I don't really mind but please >>>>>> let me know what way you prefer. >>>>> >>>>> It's better to keep it all together, so I'm happy take the alsa patch as >>>>> well, it's already been acked. >> >> Can you please take this series? I know that there is v5 from Christophe >> which has this 1/2 as 1/13. But I need this alsa patch too and I would >> like to close this because it is around for almost 2 months and none >> raised a concern about removing just these Xilinx platforms. > > Sorry I meant to reply to your last mail. > > I have Christophe's series in my testing branch, planning for it to be > in v5.8. > > Even if the rest of his series doesn't make it for some reason, as you > say the Xilinx removal is uncontroversial so I'll keep that in. > > I forgot about the sound patch, I'll pick that up as well. I took a look at your https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git repo and I can't see any branch with my patches. Also was checking linux-next and my patches are also not there. That's why I am curious if this will be go v5.8 in MW. Thanks, Michal
Hi, Le 03/06/2020 à 10:10, Michal Simek a écrit : > Hi Michael, > > On 26. 05. 20 15:44, Michael Ellerman wrote: >> Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> writes: >>> Hi Michael, >>> >>> On 01. 04. 20 13:30, Michal Simek wrote: >>>> On 01. 04. 20 12:38, Takashi Iwai wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 01 Apr 2020 12:35:16 +0200, >>>>> Michael Ellerman wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> writes: >>>>>>> On 01. 04. 20 4:07, Michael Ellerman wrote: >>>>>>>> Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> writes: >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> recently we wanted to update xilinx intc driver and we found that function >>>>>>>>> which we wanted to remove is still wired by ancient Xilinx PowerPC >>>>>>>>> platforms. Here is the thread about it. >>>>>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/48d3232d-0f1d-42ea-3109-f44bbabfa2e8@xilinx.com/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I have been talking about it internally and there is no interest in these >>>>>>>>> platforms and it is also orphan for quite a long time. None is really >>>>>>>>> running/testing these platforms regularly that's why I think it makes sense >>>>>>>>> to remove them also with drivers which are specific to this platform. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> U-Boot support was removed in 2017 without anybody complain about it >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/Xilinx/u-boot-xlnx/commit/98f705c9cefdfdba62c069821bbba10273a0a8ed >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Based on current ppc/next. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If anyone has any objection about it, please let me know. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks for taking the time to find all this code and remove it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm not going to take this series for v5.7, it was posted too close to >>>>>>>> the merge window, and doing so wouldn't give people much time to object, >>>>>>>> especially given people are distracted at the moment. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm happy to take it for v5.8, assuming there's no major objections. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sure. Just to let you know Christophe Leroy included this patch in his >>>>>>> series about ppc405 removal. It should be the same. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you don't want to take that alsa patch I can send it separately and >>>>>>> this patch can be taken from his series. I don't really mind but please >>>>>>> let me know what way you prefer. >>>>>> >>>>>> It's better to keep it all together, so I'm happy take the alsa patch as >>>>>> well, it's already been acked. >>> >>> Can you please take this series? I know that there is v5 from Christophe >>> which has this 1/2 as 1/13. But I need this alsa patch too and I would >>> like to close this because it is around for almost 2 months and none >>> raised a concern about removing just these Xilinx platforms. >> >> Sorry I meant to reply to your last mail. >> >> I have Christophe's series in my testing branch, planning for it to be >> in v5.8. >> >> Even if the rest of his series doesn't make it for some reason, as you >> say the Xilinx removal is uncontroversial so I'll keep that in. >> >> I forgot about the sound patch, I'll pick that up as well. > > I took a look at your > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git repo > and I can't see any branch with my patches. > Also was checking linux-next and my patches are also not there. > That's why I am curious if this will be go v5.8 in MW. I see them in https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git in next-test branch. Christophe
On 03. 06. 20 10:13, Christophe Leroy wrote: > Hi, > > Le 03/06/2020 à 10:10, Michal Simek a écrit : >> Hi Michael, >> >> On 26. 05. 20 15:44, Michael Ellerman wrote: >>> Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> writes: >>>> Hi Michael, >>>> >>>> On 01. 04. 20 13:30, Michal Simek wrote: >>>>> On 01. 04. 20 12:38, Takashi Iwai wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 01 Apr 2020 12:35:16 +0200, >>>>>> Michael Ellerman wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> writes: >>>>>>>> On 01. 04. 20 4:07, Michael Ellerman wrote: >>>>>>>>> Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> writes: >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> recently we wanted to update xilinx intc driver and we found >>>>>>>>>> that function >>>>>>>>>> which we wanted to remove is still wired by ancient Xilinx >>>>>>>>>> PowerPC >>>>>>>>>> platforms. Here is the thread about it. >>>>>>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/48d3232d-0f1d-42ea-3109-f44bbabfa2e8@xilinx.com/ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I have been talking about it internally and there is no >>>>>>>>>> interest in these >>>>>>>>>> platforms and it is also orphan for quite a long time. None is >>>>>>>>>> really >>>>>>>>>> running/testing these platforms regularly that's why I think >>>>>>>>>> it makes sense >>>>>>>>>> to remove them also with drivers which are specific to this >>>>>>>>>> platform. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> U-Boot support was removed in 2017 without anybody complain >>>>>>>>>> about it >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/Xilinx/u-boot-xlnx/commit/98f705c9cefdfdba62c069821bbba10273a0a8ed >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Based on current ppc/next. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If anyone has any objection about it, please let me know. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks for taking the time to find all this code and remove it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm not going to take this series for v5.7, it was posted too >>>>>>>>> close to >>>>>>>>> the merge window, and doing so wouldn't give people much time >>>>>>>>> to object, >>>>>>>>> especially given people are distracted at the moment. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm happy to take it for v5.8, assuming there's no major >>>>>>>>> objections. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sure. Just to let you know Christophe Leroy included this patch >>>>>>>> in his >>>>>>>> series about ppc405 removal. It should be the same. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you don't want to take that alsa patch I can send it >>>>>>>> separately and >>>>>>>> this patch can be taken from his series. I don't really mind but >>>>>>>> please >>>>>>>> let me know what way you prefer. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's better to keep it all together, so I'm happy take the alsa >>>>>>> patch as >>>>>>> well, it's already been acked. >>>> >>>> Can you please take this series? I know that there is v5 from >>>> Christophe >>>> which has this 1/2 as 1/13. But I need this alsa patch too and I would >>>> like to close this because it is around for almost 2 months and none >>>> raised a concern about removing just these Xilinx platforms. >>> >>> Sorry I meant to reply to your last mail. >>> >>> I have Christophe's series in my testing branch, planning for it to be >>> in v5.8. >>> >>> Even if the rest of his series doesn't make it for some reason, as you >>> say the Xilinx removal is uncontroversial so I'll keep that in. >>> >>> I forgot about the sound patch, I'll pick that up as well. >> >> I took a look at your >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git repo >> and I can't see any branch with my patches. >> Also was checking linux-next and my patches are also not there. >> That's why I am curious if this will be go v5.8 in MW. > > I see them in > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git in > next-test branch. ah. My bad. Thanks, Michal
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> writes: > Hi, > > Le 03/06/2020 à 10:10, Michal Simek a écrit : >> Hi Michael, >> >> On 26. 05. 20 15:44, Michael Ellerman wrote: >>> Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> writes: >>>> Hi Michael, >>>> >>>> On 01. 04. 20 13:30, Michal Simek wrote: >>>>> On 01. 04. 20 12:38, Takashi Iwai wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 01 Apr 2020 12:35:16 +0200, >>>>>> Michael Ellerman wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> writes: >>>>>>>> On 01. 04. 20 4:07, Michael Ellerman wrote: >>>>>>>>> Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> writes: >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> recently we wanted to update xilinx intc driver and we found that function >>>>>>>>>> which we wanted to remove is still wired by ancient Xilinx PowerPC >>>>>>>>>> platforms. Here is the thread about it. >>>>>>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/48d3232d-0f1d-42ea-3109-f44bbabfa2e8@xilinx.com/ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I have been talking about it internally and there is no interest in these >>>>>>>>>> platforms and it is also orphan for quite a long time. None is really >>>>>>>>>> running/testing these platforms regularly that's why I think it makes sense >>>>>>>>>> to remove them also with drivers which are specific to this platform. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> U-Boot support was removed in 2017 without anybody complain about it >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/Xilinx/u-boot-xlnx/commit/98f705c9cefdfdba62c069821bbba10273a0a8ed >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Based on current ppc/next. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If anyone has any objection about it, please let me know. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks for taking the time to find all this code and remove it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm not going to take this series for v5.7, it was posted too close to >>>>>>>>> the merge window, and doing so wouldn't give people much time to object, >>>>>>>>> especially given people are distracted at the moment. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm happy to take it for v5.8, assuming there's no major objections. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sure. Just to let you know Christophe Leroy included this patch in his >>>>>>>> series about ppc405 removal. It should be the same. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you don't want to take that alsa patch I can send it separately and >>>>>>>> this patch can be taken from his series. I don't really mind but please >>>>>>>> let me know what way you prefer. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's better to keep it all together, so I'm happy take the alsa patch as >>>>>>> well, it's already been acked. >>>> >>>> Can you please take this series? I know that there is v5 from Christophe >>>> which has this 1/2 as 1/13. But I need this alsa patch too and I would >>>> like to close this because it is around for almost 2 months and none >>>> raised a concern about removing just these Xilinx platforms. >>> >>> Sorry I meant to reply to your last mail. >>> >>> I have Christophe's series in my testing branch, planning for it to be >>> in v5.8. >>> >>> Even if the rest of his series doesn't make it for some reason, as you >>> say the Xilinx removal is uncontroversial so I'll keep that in. >>> >>> I forgot about the sound patch, I'll pick that up as well. >> >> I took a look at your >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git repo >> and I can't see any branch with my patches. >> Also was checking linux-next and my patches are also not there. >> That's why I am curious if this will be go v5.8 in MW. > > I see them in > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git in > next-test branch. Which == the next branch, which is what will go into v5.8, all going well. cheers