ASoC: DAPM: Fix missing kctl change notifications

Commit Message

Takashi Iwai Oct. 6, 2021, 2:17 p.m. UTC

The put callback of a kcontrol is supposed to return 1 when the value
is changed, and this will be notified to user-space.  However, some
DAPM kcontrols always return 0 (except for errors), hence the
user-space misses the update of a control value.

This patch corrects the behavior by properly returning 1 when the
value gets updated.

Reported-and-tested-by: Hans de Goede <[e-mail]>
Cc: <[e-mail]>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <[e-mail]>
---
 sound/soc/soc-dapm.c | 13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Comments

Mark Brown Oct. 7, 2021, 9:37 p.m. UTC | #1

On Wed, 6 Oct 2021 16:17:12 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> The put callback of a kcontrol is supposed to return 1 when the value
> is changed, and this will be notified to user-space.  However, some
> DAPM kcontrols always return 0 (except for errors), hence the
> user-space misses the update of a control value.
> 
> This patch corrects the behavior by properly returning 1 when the
> value gets updated.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: DAPM: Fix missing kctl change notifications
      commit: 5af82c81b2c49cfb1cad84d9eb6eab0e3d1c4842

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Patch

diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
index 7b67f1e19ae9..59d07648a7e7 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
@@ -2561,6 +2561,7 @@  static int snd_soc_dapm_set_pin(struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm,
 				const char *pin, int status)
 {
 	struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w = dapm_find_widget(dapm, pin, true);
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	dapm_assert_locked(dapm);
 
@@ -2573,13 +2574,14 @@  static int snd_soc_dapm_set_pin(struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm,
 		dapm_mark_dirty(w, "pin configuration");
 		dapm_widget_invalidate_input_paths(w);
 		dapm_widget_invalidate_output_paths(w);
+		ret = 1;
 	}
 
 	w->connected = status;
 	if (status == 0)
 		w->force = 0;
 
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -3583,14 +3585,15 @@  int snd_soc_dapm_put_pin_switch(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
 {
 	struct snd_soc_card *card = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
 	const char *pin = (const char *)kcontrol->private_value;
+	int ret;
 
 	if (ucontrol->value.integer.value[0])
-		snd_soc_dapm_enable_pin(&card->dapm, pin);
+		ret = snd_soc_dapm_enable_pin(&card->dapm, pin);
 	else
-		snd_soc_dapm_disable_pin(&card->dapm, pin);
+		ret = snd_soc_dapm_disable_pin(&card->dapm, pin);
 
 	snd_soc_dapm_sync(&card->dapm);
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dapm_put_pin_switch);
 
@@ -4023,7 +4026,7 @@  static int snd_soc_dapm_dai_link_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
 
 	rtd->params_select = ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0];
 
-	return 0;
+	return 1;
 }
 
 static void