Message ID | 20220302030900.46341-1-jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2] ASoC: fsi: Add check for clk_enable | expand |
Hi Jiasheng Thank you for your patch > As the potential failure of the clk_enable(), > it should be better to check it and return error > if fails. > > Fixes: ab6f6d85210c ("ASoC: fsi: add master clock control functions") > Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn> (snip) > + if (ret) > + goto err; > + ret = clk_enable(clock->ick); > + if (ret) > + goto disable_xck; > + ret = clk_enable(clock->div); > + if (ret) > + goto disable_ick; > > clock->count++; > } > > return ret; > + > +disable_xck: > + clk_disable(clock->xck); > +disable_ick: > + clk_disable(clock->ick); > +err: > + return ret; > } I think disable_ick() / disable_xck() order are inverted ? Thank you for your help !! Best regards --- Kuninori Morimoto
diff --git a/sound/soc/sh/fsi.c b/sound/soc/sh/fsi.c index cdf3b7f69ba7..91050478844a 100644 --- a/sound/soc/sh/fsi.c +++ b/sound/soc/sh/fsi.c @@ -816,14 +816,27 @@ static int fsi_clk_enable(struct device *dev, return ret; } - clk_enable(clock->xck); - clk_enable(clock->ick); - clk_enable(clock->div); + ret = clk_enable(clock->xck); + if (ret) + goto err; + ret = clk_enable(clock->ick); + if (ret) + goto disable_xck; + ret = clk_enable(clock->div); + if (ret) + goto disable_ick; clock->count++; } return ret; + +disable_xck: + clk_disable(clock->xck); +disable_ick: + clk_disable(clock->ick); +err: + return ret; } static int fsi_clk_disable(struct device *dev,
As the potential failure of the clk_enable(), it should be better to check it and return error if fails. Fixes: ab6f6d85210c ("ASoC: fsi: add master clock control functions") Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn> --- Changelog: v1 -> v2 * Change 1. Seperate the error handler. --- sound/soc/sh/fsi.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)