| Message ID | 20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v3-7-9a1358472d52@cerno.tech (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | clk: Make determine_rate mandatory for muxes | expand |
On 04.04.2023 13:10, Maxime Ripard wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe > > The SAM9x5 slow clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but > doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. > > This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, > change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to > trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with > determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a > given rate. > > The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less > used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. > > So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an > oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the > original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to > clk_set_parent(). > > The latter case would be equivalent to setting the flag > CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT, together with setting our determine_rate hook > to __clk_mux_determine_rate(). Indeed, if no determine_rate > implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through > clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if > CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate > otherwise. __clk_mux_determine_rate() has the exact same behavior when > CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT is set. > > And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our > behavior now and it can be further refined down the line. > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> Tested-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> > --- > drivers/clk/at91/sckc.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/sckc.c b/drivers/clk/at91/sckc.c > index fdc9b669f8a7..9c42961a8a2f 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/at91/sckc.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/sckc.c > @@ -310,6 +310,7 @@ static u8 clk_sam9x5_slow_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw) > } > > static const struct clk_ops sam9x5_slow_ops = { > + .determine_rate = __clk_mux_determine_rate, > .set_parent = clk_sam9x5_slow_set_parent, > .get_parent = clk_sam9x5_slow_get_parent, > }; > @@ -337,7 +338,7 @@ at91_clk_register_sam9x5_slow(void __iomem *sckcr, > init.ops = &sam9x5_slow_ops; > init.parent_names = parent_names; > init.num_parents = num_parents; > - init.flags = 0; > + init.flags = CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT; > > slowck->hw.init = &init; > slowck->sckcr = sckcr; > > -- > 2.39.2 >
diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/sckc.c b/drivers/clk/at91/sckc.c index fdc9b669f8a7..9c42961a8a2f 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/at91/sckc.c +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/sckc.c @@ -310,6 +310,7 @@ static u8 clk_sam9x5_slow_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw) } static const struct clk_ops sam9x5_slow_ops = { + .determine_rate = __clk_mux_determine_rate, .set_parent = clk_sam9x5_slow_set_parent, .get_parent = clk_sam9x5_slow_get_parent, }; @@ -337,7 +338,7 @@ at91_clk_register_sam9x5_slow(void __iomem *sckcr, init.ops = &sam9x5_slow_ops; init.parent_names = parent_names; init.num_parents = num_parents; - init.flags = 0; + init.flags = CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT; slowck->hw.init = &init; slowck->sckcr = sckcr;
The SAM9x5 slow clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation. This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies, change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate. The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock. So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to clk_set_parent(). The latter case would be equivalent to setting the flag CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT, together with setting our determine_rate hook to __clk_mux_determine_rate(). Indeed, if no determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate otherwise. __clk_mux_determine_rate() has the exact same behavior when CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT is set. And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our behavior now and it can be further refined down the line. Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> --- drivers/clk/at91/sckc.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)